From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Gou Hao <gouhao@uniontech.com>
Cc: cem@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
gouhaojake@163.com, guanwentao@uniontech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs-doc: Fix typo error
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 08:56:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251104165605.GI196370@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251104093406.9135-1-gouhao@uniontech.com>
On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 05:34:06PM +0800, Gou Hao wrote:
> online fsck may take longer than offline fsck...
>
> Signed-off-by: Gou Hao <gouhao@uniontech.com>
With hch's comments about the commit message addressed,
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
> index 8cbcd3c26434..55e727b5f12e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
> @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ sharing and lock acquisition rules as the regular filesystem.
> This means that scrub cannot take *any* shortcuts to save time, because doing
> so could lead to concurrency problems.
> In other words, online fsck is not a complete replacement for offline fsck, and
> -a complete run of online fsck may take longer than online fsck.
> +a complete run of online fsck may take longer than offline fsck.
> However, both of these limitations are acceptable tradeoffs to satisfy the
> different motivations of online fsck, which are to **minimize system downtime**
> and to **increase predictability of operation**.
> --
> 2.20.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-04 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-04 9:34 [PATCH] xfs-doc: Fix typo error Gou Hao
2025-11-04 10:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-04 16:56 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-11-05 1:35 ` [PATCH V2] " Gou Hao
2025-11-10 19:50 ` Jonathan Corbet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251104165605.GI196370@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gouhao@uniontech.com \
--cc=gouhaojake@163.com \
--cc=guanwentao@uniontech.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox