* [PATCH v8 00/11] sched, steal_governor: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask and steal-driven vCPU backoff
@ 2026-07-20 17:22 Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 01/11] sched/docs: Document cpu_preferred_mask and Preferred CPU concept Shrikanth Hegde
` (10 more replies)
0 siblings, 11 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Shrikanth Hegde @ 2026-07-20 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, mingo, peterz, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot,
yury.norov, kprateek.nayak, iii, corbet
Cc: sshegde, tglx, gregkh, pbonzini, seanjc, vschneid, huschle,
rostedt, dietmar.eggemann, maddy, srikar, hdanton, chleroy,
vineeth, frederic, arighi, pauld, christian.loehle, tj,
tommaso.cucinotta, maz, rafael, rdunlap, kernellwp, linux-doc,
jgross, virtualization
This patch series represents the result of multiple iterations,
redesigns and community feedback. What started as an arch-specific RFC
has evolved into a scheduler mechanism paired with a virtualization
driver.
Special thanks to Yury Norov for the rigorous reviews that greatly
improved the series and to everyone who have provided their review
comments so far. Really appreciated! _/\_
I have put a detailed context around problem statement, design, best
practises and performance numbers below. This cover-letter is a good
starting point for anyone looking into this solution without the pain of
browsing through all the previous patches/videos.
Apologies in advance if any review comments are missed or any
missing implementation for the new driver. If so would be purely
accidental, not in any way intentional.
Background and Problem Statement
================================
As hardware scales, the density of physical CPUs (pCPUs) per server is
increasing across many architectures. On these massive systems, deploying
a single bare-metal OS for general workloads becomes increasingly difficult
to manage if not impossible. The natural shift is to deploy
Virtual Machines(VMs). For example, on IBM PowerPC architecture customers
frequently deploy Shared Processor LPARs (SPLPARs) to maximize hardware ROI.
Typical enterprise workloads are combination of bursty and long running;
their average CPU utilization is low, but they require high core counts
during peak transactions. To accommodate this, customers often
use CPU overcommit strategies i.e. configuring VMs with a large number
of virtual CPUs (vCPUs) while backing them with a smaller, shared pool
of physical CPUs (pCPUs). This achieves a high server consolidation
and excellent cost efficiency.
However, when multiple such VMs have high utilization simultaneously,
the shared pCPU pool becomes contended. The hypervisor is forced to preempt
one vCPU to run another to maintain fairness. It maybe schedule vCPU of same
VM or different VM. If a vCPU is preempted while holding a lock or
irq disabled section, overall forward progress collapses. There are some
mitigation strategies such as yielding the vCPU to lock-holder, but they
don't cover all the cases. In addition there are hidden costs such as cache,
tlb misses, cost of vCPU preemption, host scheduling overheads etc.
Under heavy contention, the most effective mitigation strategy is for
the guests/VMs to voluntarily fold its workload onto a smaller subset
of its vCPUs. By demanding fewer pCPUs, the VMs reduces overall host
contention, which decreases vCPU preemption and improves total throughput
for the system.
Limitations of Existing Approaches
==================================
CPU Hotplug, Isolated cpusets, cpuset:
- This is a heavy and administrative operation that requires topology rebuild.
Crucially, it breaks userspace CPU affinities.
Explicit task affinity:
- Very difficult to manage for the users, if not impossible.
We need a fast, co-operative backoff mechanism inside the kernel that can
dynamically react to contention without violating user/task affinity
contracts. Since reacting to the contention is agnostic to the user
it cannot violate user affinity contracts.
When there is high contention, fold the workload and use limited vCPUs
and when there is no contention, use all the vCPUs again. This natural
expansion/contraction gives the best possible performance to the users
based on the underlying contention.
Proposed Architecture
=====================
Current design is built on basis that contention is effectively
quantified by steal time as seen in guest kernel.
Steal time is already a well established construct today in
para-virtualization world. All major archs support this feature.
It is indication of the contention of physical CPU. It scales according
to the amount of contention. Today it is used by administrative users
for changing the VM configurations. During high contention the steal
time shows up in each guest based on its configuration. The proposed
solution works well when all VMs honor the hint and work in co-operative
manner. Note there is still no inter-guest communication to achieve this
co-operation. Read the section on best practises on how to get the
best out of this solution.
This series introduces a dynamic vCPU backoff mechanism.
It is separated into a core scheduler mechanism and a loadable
virtualization policy module.
Layer A: The Scheduler Mechanism (preferred CPUs)
=================================================
Series introduces a new CPU state called preferred. It indicates that
vCPU can be safely used and using that vCPU won't increase contention
for underlying physical CPUs. This state info is made available via
cpu_preferred_mask, which is strictly maintained as a subset of
cpu_active_mask.
The scheduler uses this mask as a hint to fold workloads onto preferred
CPUs using a few mechanisms.
1, Wakeup: is_cpu_allowed() checks if CPU is preferred. If not calls
select_fallback_rq, which selects a preferred CPU if tasks's affinity
permits.
2. The Tick (Push): During sched_tick(), if the current CPU is non-preferred,
the scheduler actively pushes the running task onto a preferred CPU
using a stopper thread.
3. Load Balance: sched_balance_rq restricts its domain span to
cpu_preferred_mask, preventing tasks from being pulled toward
non-preferred CPUs.
Design Constraint: The scheduler strictly respects user affinities.
If a task is pinned exclusively to non-preferred CPUs, it will remain there.
The kernel will not break user/task affinity contracts.
Layer B: The Policy Engine (virt/steal_governor)
================================================
The core scheduler should not dictate virtualization policy.
Therefore, the policy is isolated into a new driver: steal_governor.
(Can be selected by CONFIG_STEAL_GOVERNOR)
This module latches onto that concept that contention is quantified by
steal time. It periodically samples the steal time values across the
system and depending on high/low steal values, takes appropriate action.
When it sees high steal times, i.e. steal time exceeds high_threshold
(default 5%), driver reduces the preferred CPUs by 1 core.
When it sees Low Steal Times, i.e. steal time drops below low_threshold
(default 2%), driver increases the preferred CPUs by 1 core.
This creates a dynamic, self-maintained stepwise loop. The guest automatically
shrinks its pCPU footprint when the host is saturated, and expands it when
the noise clears while requiring zero cross-VM communication.
Policy Design Constraints:
- Ensure at least one core is kept as preferred.
- Ensure preferred is always subset of active.
Best Practises
==============
1. Ensure all the VM run kernel which has the patches.
2. Keep CONFIG_STEAL_GOVERNOR=m. Build it as module, but don't load it by
default. When the administrative user enables it in one VM, he/she
will likely enable it in all VMs. Also module parameters can
only be changed at module load. Having it as module also allows one
to disable it to remove additional overhead it brings.
3. Keep the interval_ms=500 to 5000. I.e. between 500ms to 5second.
Though parameters allows slightly higher range.
4. Fine tune low and high threshold depending on your platform for best
results. Even where is no contention, very small steal values
might show up. So it might be better to keep low threshold higher
than 0.
Baseline and Revision History
==============================
tip/sched/core at
commit: '04998aa54848 ("sched/eevdf: Delayed dequeue task can't preempt")'
For a detailed talk on the problem and discussion on this issue, one can also
refer to the OSPM26 talk[1].
[1]: https://youtu.be/adxUKFPlOp0
[2]: https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/ibm-power-virtualization-best-practices-guide
[3]: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/linux-on-systems?topic=bad-daytrader
v7->v8:
- Rename to STEAL_GOVERNOR from STEAL_MONITOR.
- Remove additional defaults.c and move it to core.c (Yury Norov)
- Remove SM_DIR gating for direction control. (Yury Norov)
- Enforce design constraint and restore the state if not met (Yury
Norov)
- Drop nohz_full tick enable patch.
- Move Kconfig patch as the last patch for enablement. (Yury Norov)
- Use disable_delayed_work_sync to avoid race condition during
module unload. (Yury Norov)
- Add same kconfig dependency and fail to compile the driver (Yury Norov)
- Make low < high comparison during module init instead as they
are dependent parameters (Sashiko)
- Update sysfs file helper section (Yury Norov)
- Make preferred sysfs file available only with CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU=y
(Yury Norov)
- A few documentation and comments fixes. (Randy Dunlap)
- Fix possible race in sched_push_current_non_preferred_cpu (Yury Norov)
- Move is_migration_disabled check just before actual migration.
- Make 100ms as minimal interval_ms from 10ms.
- Make helper functions static and remove from header file as there
are no other callers.
- Collapse helper functions and periodic work into one patch.
Short summary on previous versions:
v6->v7:
- Consolidate new driver code to 4-5 patches.
- deffer the arch specific interface.
- Use possible CPUs instead of active for steal value calculations.
- Simplify is_cpu_allowed.
- Make module parameters fixed at module load
- Define CONFIG_STEAL_MONITOR and Make it select CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU
v5->v6:
- Drop the optimization of caching the preferred state
in select_fallback_rq
- Drop wakeup patch
v4->v5:
- Move the computation of steal time and decide on preferred CPU state
to a driver. i.e new driver called STEAL_MONITOR
v3->v4:
- Make preferred subset of active instead of online.
- Dropped RT patch and Defer sched_ext. Support only FAIR class.
v2->v3:
- Introduce a new config CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU
v1->v2:
- A new name - Preferred CPUs and cpu_preferred_mask
- Arch independent code. Everything happens in scheduler.
- Steal time computation is gated with sched feature STEAL_MONITOR
RFC v3-> RFC v4:
- Introduced computation of steal time in arch/powerpc.
RFC PATCH v1:
- push task mechanism.
- No steal time computation. Manual sysfs hint for preferred CPUs
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/236f4925-dd3c-41ef-be04-47708c9ce129@linux.ibm.com/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260407191950.643549-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com/#t
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260514152204.481115-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com/#r
v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260617174139.155540-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com/#t
v5: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260625124648.802832-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com/
v6: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260701141654.500125-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com/#t
v7: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260709215648.1246821-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com/
Even earlier version:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/236f4925-dd3c-41ef-be04-47708c9ce129@linux.ibm.com/
========================================
Performance Numbers (powerpc, x86, s390)
========================================
PowerPC:
===================
VM1: 60VP/30EC and VM2: 30VP/20EC
Shared physical CPU pool size: 50 Cores. Each core is SMT8.
(VP - Virtual Core, EC - Entitles Core) - PowerVM terminologies of SPLPAR[2]
Default parameter values: 1000ms, 200 low threshold, 500 high threshold
Both the VMs are running the same workload. Total throughput/time of VM1+VM2
is being mentioned in all cases.
Hackbench
baseline steal_governor steal_governor
disabled enabled
======================================================================
10 groups 5.20 | 5.40 (-3.85%) | 4.65 (+10.58%)
20 groups 11.39 | 12.01 (-5.44%) | 7.09 (+37.75%)
40 groups 20.32 | 19.80 (+2.56%) | 11.31 (+44.34%)
10 groups(-p) 2.37 | 2.26 (+4.64%) | 2.06 (+13.08%)
20 groups(-p) 3.34 | 3.28 (+1.80%) | 3.20 (+4.19%)
40 groups(-p) 4.46 | 4.83 (-8.30%) | 4.26 (+4.48%)
Remarks: Net improvement with steal_governor specially high load points.
schbench ( -L -n 0 -r 30 -s 0)
baseline steal_governor steal_governor
disabled enabled
======================================================================
-m 1 -t 128 2475162 | 2621246 (+5.90%) | 2527299 (+2.11%)
-m 1 -t 256 1467350 | 1470032 (+0.18%) | 1492372 (+1.71%)
-m 1 -t 512 1408813 | 1454687 (+3.26%) | 1437605 (+2.04%)
Remarks: Effectively means no-improvements or regressions
kernbench baseline steal_governor steal_governor
(elapsed time) disabled enabled
======================================================================
-j nr_cpus 231 | 235 (-1.7%) | 199 (+14%)
Remarks: Net improvement in elapsed time.
Daytrader - A real life work which is a proxy for trading based
on db2[3]
baseline steal_governor steal_governor
disabled enabled
======================================================================
Load@30% 1x | 0.96x | 1.53x
Load@60% 1x | 0.94x | 1.41x
Remarks: Good improvement seen at different load points.
When there is no steal time (such as dedicated LPAR, or only VM2
is running) throughput was same with steal_governor enabled/disabled
which indicates minimal overhead of steal_governor.
Data from x86,s390 KVM which Ilya Leoshkevich carried out during OSPM26
time. *This was based on v2*. Idea is still the name, numbers are
expected to be better in v8 as some of the overhead has been removed.
Note: Other variations of the benchmark shows no observable
difference.
x86:
====
cascade-lake: 32 threads = 16 cores
Benchmark #VMs #CPUs/VM ΔRPS (%std)
===============================================
hackbench 8 16 90.73% ± 9.97%
hackbench 4 24 52.67% ± 7.43%
hackbench 4 16 37.96% ± 11.19%
hackbench 4 32 37.82% ± 4.38%
hackbench 12 8 36.90% ± 4.74%
hackbench 8 8 35.30% ± 3.61%
pgbench 16 4 31.77% ± 2.44%
hackbench 2 24 25.85% ± 8.63%
hackbench 16 8 24.87% ± 3.46%
pgbench 16 8 21.83% ± 2.20%
pgbench 12 8 21.35% ± 2.15%
pgbench 8 8 18.46% ± 1.01%
hackbench 2 32 15.56% ± 4.53%
pgbench 12 4 14.28% ± 2.04%
hackbench 16 4 14.07% ± 2.90%
hackbench 12 4 9.60% ± 3.49%
[...]
pgbench 4 8 -1.16% ± 3.60%
hackbench 4 4 -1.80% ± 9.55%
sysbench 12 4 -2.19% ± 0.78%
pgbench 4 24 -2.43% ± 4.38%
pgbench 4 32 -3.21% ± 0.79%
sysbench 16 4 -3.22% ± 1.09%
S390:
=====
z16: 16 threads = 8 cores (SMT-2)
Benchmark #VMs #CPUs/VM ΔRPS (std%)
===============================================
pgbench 2 8 73.50% ± 35.91%
pgbench 16 4 61.30% ± 4.09%
hackbench 16 4 54.11% ± 4.38%
hackbench 12 4 36.34% ± 4.63%
pgbench 12 4 34.83% ± 2.57%
hackbench 8 4 29.75% ± 5.86%
hackbench 8 8 25.98% ± 5.09%
pgbench 2 4 23.31% ± 33.44%
pgbench 2 16 19.95% ± 17.12%
hackbench 4 8 19.43% ± 9.33%
pgbench 8 4 19.32% ± 4.50%
[...]
schbench 8 8 -0.79% ± 0.33%
sysbench 8 8 -0.81% ± 0.39%
hackbench 4 16 -1.11% ± 5.82%
sysbench 8 4 -1.62% ± 0.49%
sysbench 16 4 -2.70% ± 0.58%
schbench 16 4 -2.73% ± 0.91%
sysbench 12 4 -2.91% ± 0.61%
hackbench 2 24 -4.99% ± 3.31%
Summary:
- Many improvement across archs specially with real life workloads.
- No major regressions observed.
- Overhead of steal_governor looks minimal when there is no steal time.
- Overhead when STEAL_GOVERNOR=n is negligible.
Testing and Validation
======================
Apart from performance, To ensure the robustness of the preferred
CPU masking and push mechanisms, the following scenarios were tested:
- CPU Hotplug: bringing CPUs up/down change the preferred mask
accordingly under no-contention and contention.
- Housekeeping cores: Verified with different combinations of
nohz_full=<beginning, middle, end set of CPUs> to ensure that
policy engine restricts to first housekeeping core in extreme cases.
- User Affinity: Confirmed that tasks explicitly pinned to non-preferred
CPUs via taskset remain on their assigned CPUs.
- Affine Move: Confirmed the affinity move using "taskset -cp" happens
on all combinations of non-preferred, non-preferred under contention.
- Affinity and hotplug: It works as expected. I.e affinity gets
reset if all the CPUs of p->cpus_ptr go offline even if they are
non-preferred CPUs.
- Extreme load and running threads: for example 4800 stress-ng threads
on 480 CPU system and it still packs to preferred CPUs.
Known Limitations & Future Work
===============================
To keep this initial implementation clean and minimal, a few optimizations
have been deferred:
- Push all tasks on rq: Currently, the stopper thread only pushes the current
running task off a non-preferred CPU. Future optimizations may look into
migrating all queued tasks on that runqueue.
- Sched Classes: This feature currently only works for the FAIR
class. Real-time (RT) and sched_ext classes are deferred for now,
as there is no need for it.
- Arch specific hints from HW and framework for it as been deferred to
the future.
- NUMA Splicing: The steal_governor currently removes last active core
based on CPU number. It does not yet do complex NUMA-aware splicing,
expecting that CPUs are spread out uniformly across nodes in
most cases.
Shrikanth Hegde (11):
sched/docs: Document cpu_preferred_mask and Preferred CPU concept
cpumask: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask
sysfs: Add preferred CPU file
sched/core: Try to use a preferred CPU in is_cpu_allowed
sched/fair: Load balance only among preferred CPUs
sched/core: Push current task from non preferred CPU
sched/debug: Add migration stats due to non preferred CPUs
virt: Introduce steal governor driver
virt/steal_governor: Add control knobs for handling steal values
virt/steal_governor: Implement steal_governor policy loop
virt/steal_governor: Enable the driver
.../ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 14 +
Documentation/driver-api/index.rst | 1 +
Documentation/driver-api/steal-governor.rst | 117 ++++++++
Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst | 58 ++++
MAINTAINERS | 9 +
drivers/base/cpu.c | 12 +
drivers/virt/Kconfig | 2 +
drivers/virt/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/virt/steal_governor/Kconfig | 18 ++
drivers/virt/steal_governor/Makefile | 6 +
drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.c | 277 ++++++++++++++++++
drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.h | 30 ++
include/linux/cpumask.h | 24 ++
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
kernel/Kconfig.preempt | 4 +
kernel/cpu.c | 6 +
kernel/sched/core.c | 100 ++++++-
kernel/sched/debug.c | 1 +
kernel/sched/fair.c | 11 +-
kernel/sched/sched.h | 20 ++
20 files changed, 704 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/steal-governor.rst
create mode 100644 drivers/virt/steal_governor/Kconfig
create mode 100644 drivers/virt/steal_governor/Makefile
create mode 100644 drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.c
create mode 100644 drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.h
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v8 01/11] sched/docs: Document cpu_preferred_mask and Preferred CPU concept
2026-07-20 17:22 [PATCH v8 00/11] sched, steal_governor: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask and steal-driven vCPU backoff Shrikanth Hegde
@ 2026-07-20 17:22 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 02/11] cpumask: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask Shrikanth Hegde
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Shrikanth Hegde @ 2026-07-20 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, mingo, peterz, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot,
yury.norov, kprateek.nayak, iii, corbet
Cc: sshegde, tglx, gregkh, pbonzini, seanjc, vschneid, huschle,
rostedt, dietmar.eggemann, maddy, srikar, hdanton, chleroy,
vineeth, frederic, arighi, pauld, christian.loehle, tj,
tommaso.cucinotta, maz, rafael, rdunlap, kernellwp, linux-doc,
jgross, virtualization, kernel test robot
Add documentation for new cpumask called cpu_preferred_mask. This could
help users in understanding what this mask is and the concept behind it.
Document how to enable it and implementation aspects of it.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606180717.yNM0yb41-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst
index ed07efea7d02..1ce0f92bc3f2 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst
@@ -62,6 +62,64 @@ Your cpu_idle routines need to obey the following rules:
arch/x86/kernel/process.c has examples of both polling and
sleeping idle functions.
+Preferred CPUs
+==============
+
+In virtualised environments it is possible to overcommit CPU resources. i.e.
+the sum of virtual CPUs (vCPUs) of all VMs is greater than number of physical
+CPUs (pCPUs). Under such conditions when all or many VMs have high utilization,
+hypervisor won't be able to satisfy the CPU requirement and has to context
+switch within or across VMs. The hypervisor needs to preempt one vCPU to run
+another. This is called vCPU preemption. This is more expensive compared to
+task context switch within a vCPU.
+
+In such cases it is better that combined vCPU ask from all VMs is reduced
+by not using some of the vCPUs in each VM. vCPUs where workload can be safely
+scheduled which won't increase any contention for pCPU are called as
+"Preferred CPUs".
+
+Main design construct is preferred CPUs are always a subset of active CPUs.
+In most cases preferred CPUs will be same as active CPUs, when there is pCPU
+contention, Preferred CPUs will reduce based on the amount of steal time.
+When the pCPU contention goes away as indicated by steal time, Preferred CPUs
+will become same as active CPUs again. This is done by loading the
+steal_governor driver available at drivers/virt/steal_governor.
+
+For scheduling decisions such as wakeup, pushing the task etc, needs this
+CPU state info. This is maintained in cpu_preferred_mask.
+vCPUs which are not in cpu_preferred_mask should be treated as vCPUs which
+should not be used at this moment provided it doesn't break user affinity.
+
+This is achieved by:
+
+1. Selecting a preferred CPU at wakeup using fallback mechanism.
+2. Push the task away from non-preferred CPU at tick.
+3. Only select preferred CPUs for load balance.
+
+/sys/devices/system/cpu/preferred prints the current cpu_preferred_mask in
+cpulist format.
+
+Notes:
+
+1. This feature is available under CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU. It is selected
+ by steal_governor driver (CONFIG_STEAL_GOVERNOR). On enabling the
+ driver, CPU preferred state can change based on steal time. Without that
+ driver, preferred CPUs is same as active CPUs.
+
+2. This feature works for FAIR class only.
+
+3. A task pinned, which can't be moved to preferred CPUs will continue
+ to run based on its affinity. But no load balancing happens.
+
+4. Decision to use/not use is driven by kernel. Hence it shouldn't
+ break user affinities. One of the main reasons why CPU hotplug
+ or Isolated cpuset partitions was not a solution.
+
+5. This feature works best only when all the VMs enable the feature as
+ it is a co-operative scheme. If a specific VM doesn't enable this feature
+ it may end up with more CPUs than others, still should lead to better
+ performance when seen from system view.
+ Users who enable this driver must ensure it is enabled in all VMs.
Possible arch/ problems
=======================
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v8 02/11] cpumask: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask
2026-07-20 17:22 [PATCH v8 00/11] sched, steal_governor: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask and steal-driven vCPU backoff Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 01/11] sched/docs: Document cpu_preferred_mask and Preferred CPU concept Shrikanth Hegde
@ 2026-07-20 17:22 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 03/11] sysfs: Add preferred CPU file Shrikanth Hegde
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Shrikanth Hegde @ 2026-07-20 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, mingo, peterz, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot,
yury.norov, kprateek.nayak, iii, corbet
Cc: sshegde, tglx, gregkh, pbonzini, seanjc, vschneid, huschle,
rostedt, dietmar.eggemann, maddy, srikar, hdanton, chleroy,
vineeth, frederic, arighi, pauld, christian.loehle, tj,
tommaso.cucinotta, maz, rafael, rdunlap, kernellwp, linux-doc,
jgross, virtualization
Provide cpu_preferred_mask infrastructure. Define get/set macros
which could be used to get/set CPU state as preferred.
PREFERRED_CPU config will be selected by the driver which handles
steal time values. It is going to set/clear preferred CPU state.
This driver will be called steal_governor and it is introduced in
subsequent patches. It periodically samples the steal time and
decides on preferred CPU state.
A CPU is set to preferred when it becomes active. Later it may be
marked as non-preferred depending on steal time values with
steal_governor being enabled.
Always maintain design construct of preferred is subset of active.
i.e. preferred ⊆ active ⊆ online ⊆ present ⊆ possible
With PREFERRED_CPU=n, ensure set_cpu_preferred is a nop and get
method returns the active state in that case.
Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/cpumask.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/Kconfig.preempt | 4 ++++
kernel/cpu.c | 6 ++++++
kernel/sched/core.c | 5 +++++
4 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
index d3cda0544954..34d08a3d80e1 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@ -122,12 +122,20 @@ extern struct cpumask __cpu_enabled_mask;
extern struct cpumask __cpu_present_mask;
extern struct cpumask __cpu_active_mask;
extern struct cpumask __cpu_dying_mask;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU
+extern struct cpumask __cpu_preferred_mask;
+#else
+#define __cpu_preferred_mask __cpu_active_mask
+#endif
+
#define cpu_possible_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_possible_mask)
#define cpu_online_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_online_mask)
#define cpu_enabled_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_enabled_mask)
#define cpu_present_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_present_mask)
#define cpu_active_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_active_mask)
#define cpu_dying_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_dying_mask)
+#define cpu_preferred_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_preferred_mask)
extern atomic_t __num_online_cpus;
extern unsigned int __num_possible_cpus;
@@ -1164,6 +1172,12 @@ void init_cpu_possible(const struct cpumask *src);
#define set_cpu_active(cpu, active) assign_cpu((cpu), &__cpu_active_mask, (active))
#define set_cpu_dying(cpu, dying) assign_cpu((cpu), &__cpu_dying_mask, (dying))
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU
+#define set_cpu_preferred(cpu, preferred) assign_cpu((cpu), &__cpu_preferred_mask, (preferred))
+#else
+#define set_cpu_preferred(cpu, preferred) do { } while (0)
+#endif
+
void set_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu, bool online);
void set_cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu, bool possible);
@@ -1258,6 +1272,11 @@ static __always_inline bool cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu)
return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_dying_mask);
}
+static __always_inline bool cpu_preferred(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_preferred_mask);
+}
+
#else
#define num_online_cpus() 1U
@@ -1296,6 +1315,11 @@ static __always_inline bool cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu)
return false;
}
+static __always_inline bool cpu_preferred(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ return cpu == 0;
+}
+
#endif /* NR_CPUS > 1 */
#define cpu_is_offline(cpu) unlikely(!cpu_online(cpu))
diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
index 88c594c6d7fc..de789b274ba3 100644
--- a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
+++ b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
@@ -192,3 +192,7 @@ config SCHED_CLASS_EXT
For more information:
Documentation/scheduler/sched-ext.rst
https://github.com/sched-ext/scx
+
+config PREFERRED_CPU
+ bool
+ depends on SMP && PARAVIRT
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index b3c8553d7bd6..376d297a6292 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -3103,6 +3103,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_dying_mask);
atomic_t __num_online_cpus __read_mostly;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__num_online_cpus);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU
+struct cpumask __cpu_preferred_mask __read_mostly;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__cpu_preferred_mask);
+#endif
+
void init_cpu_present(const struct cpumask *src)
{
cpumask_copy(&__cpu_present_mask, src);
@@ -3160,6 +3165,7 @@ void __init boot_cpu_init(void)
/* Mark the boot cpu "present", "online" etc for SMP and UP case */
set_cpu_online(cpu, true);
set_cpu_active(cpu, true);
+ set_cpu_preferred(cpu, true);
set_cpu_present(cpu, true);
set_cpu_possible(cpu, true);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 2e7cde033a31..a45f7c308329 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -8690,6 +8690,9 @@ int sched_cpu_activate(unsigned int cpu)
*/
sched_set_rq_online(rq, cpu);
+ /* preferred is subset of active and follows its state */
+ set_cpu_preferred(cpu, true);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -8703,6 +8706,8 @@ int sched_cpu_deactivate(unsigned int cpu)
if (ret)
return ret;
+ set_cpu_preferred(cpu, false);
+
/*
* Remove CPU from nohz.idle_cpus_mask to prevent participating in
* load balancing when not active
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v8 03/11] sysfs: Add preferred CPU file
2026-07-20 17:22 [PATCH v8 00/11] sched, steal_governor: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask and steal-driven vCPU backoff Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 01/11] sched/docs: Document cpu_preferred_mask and Preferred CPU concept Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 02/11] cpumask: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask Shrikanth Hegde
@ 2026-07-20 17:22 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 04/11] sched/core: Try to use a preferred CPU in is_cpu_allowed Shrikanth Hegde
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Shrikanth Hegde @ 2026-07-20 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, mingo, peterz, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot,
yury.norov, kprateek.nayak, iii, corbet
Cc: sshegde, tglx, gregkh, pbonzini, seanjc, vschneid, huschle,
rostedt, dietmar.eggemann, maddy, srikar, hdanton, chleroy,
vineeth, frederic, arighi, pauld, christian.loehle, tj,
tommaso.cucinotta, maz, rafael, rdunlap, kernellwp, linux-doc,
jgross, virtualization
Add "preferred" file in /sys/devices/system/cpu
This would help
- Users to quickly check which CPUs are marked as preferred.
- Userspace daemons such as irqbalance to use this mask to
send irq into preferred CPUs.
For example:
cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/online
0-719
cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/preferred
0-599 <<< Implies 0-599 are preferred for workloads and 600-719
should be avoided at this moment.
cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/preferred
0-719 <<< All CPUs are usable. There is no preference.
Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 14 ++++++++++++++
drivers/base/cpu.c | 12 ++++++++++++
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
index 82d10d556cc8..676412c46b2a 100644
--- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
+++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
@@ -806,3 +806,17 @@ Date: Nov 2022
Contact: Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Description:
(RO) the list of CPUs that can be brought online.
+
+What: /sys/devices/system/cpu/preferred
+Date: July 2026
+Contact: Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
+Description:
+ (RO) the list of preferred CPUs applicable in
+ paravirtualized environments.
+
+ The steal governor driver dynamically adjusts this mask
+ based on observed steal time. Scheduling tasks on
+ CPUs outside of this list may lead to performance
+ degradations due to underlying physical CPU contention.
+
+ See Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst for more details.
diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c
index 19d288a3c80c..5da2a96fb37e 100644
--- a/drivers/base/cpu.c
+++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c
@@ -391,6 +391,15 @@ static int cpu_uevent(const struct device *dev, struct kobj_uevent_env *env)
}
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU
+static ssize_t preferred_show(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+ return sysfs_emit(buf, "%*pbl\n", cpumask_pr_args(cpu_preferred_mask));
+}
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(preferred);
+#endif
+
const struct bus_type cpu_subsys = {
.name = "cpu",
.dev_name = "cpu",
@@ -531,6 +540,9 @@ static struct attribute *cpu_root_attrs[] = {
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU_AUTOPROBE
&dev_attr_modalias.attr,
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU
+ &dev_attr_preferred.attr,
#endif
NULL
};
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v8 04/11] sched/core: Try to use a preferred CPU in is_cpu_allowed
2026-07-20 17:22 [PATCH v8 00/11] sched, steal_governor: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask and steal-driven vCPU backoff Shrikanth Hegde
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 03/11] sysfs: Add preferred CPU file Shrikanth Hegde
@ 2026-07-20 17:22 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 05/11] sched/fair: Load balance only among preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Shrikanth Hegde @ 2026-07-20 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, mingo, peterz, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot,
yury.norov, kprateek.nayak, iii, corbet
Cc: sshegde, tglx, gregkh, pbonzini, seanjc, vschneid, huschle,
rostedt, dietmar.eggemann, maddy, srikar, hdanton, chleroy,
vineeth, frederic, arighi, pauld, christian.loehle, tj,
tommaso.cucinotta, maz, rafael, rdunlap, kernellwp, linux-doc,
jgross, virtualization
When possible, choose a preferred CPUs to pick.
This is essential to maintain user affinities when preferred
CPUs change. A task pinned on non-preferred CPU should continue
to run there, since this is non-user triggered.
If CPU is non-preferred and task can run on other CPUs which are
currently preferred, then choose those other CPUs instead.
This is decided by checking cpus_ptr and cpu_preferred_mask
intersect or not. If yes, task has other preferred CPUs, it can
run there instead.
Overhead is minimal when CPU is preferred.
Push task mechanism uses stopper thread which going to call
select_fallback_rq and use this mechanism to pick only a preferred CPU.
This takes care of wakeup path for FAIR tasks too.
is_cpu_allowed is called to ensure wakeup happens on preferred CPUs.
With that, additional checks in available_idle_cpu is not necessary.
For majority of the cases this would still keep select_fallback_rq
as O(N). task_has_preferred_cpus which is O(N) is called only if
!cpu_preferred. Then task running there is expected to move out.
So subsequent it should run on preferred CPU. This becomes O(N**2)
only for tasks pinned only non preferred CPUs. That is rare case.
Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 12 ++++++++++--
kernel/sched/sched.h | 12 ++++++++++++
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index a45f7c308329..9e8eec4451b6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2509,8 +2509,12 @@ static inline bool is_cpu_allowed(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
return cpu_online(cpu);
/* Non kernel threads are not allowed during either online or offline. */
- if (!(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
+ if (!(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) {
+ /* Try to use preferred CPU if task's affinity allows */
+ if (task_can_sched_on_preferred(cpu, p))
+ return false;
return cpu_active(cpu);
+ }
/* KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU is always allowed. */
if (kthread_is_per_cpu(p))
@@ -2520,7 +2524,11 @@ static inline bool is_cpu_allowed(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
if (cpu_dying(cpu))
return false;
- /* But are allowed during online. */
+ /* Try to keep unbound kthreads on a preferred CPU if possible. */
+ if (task_can_sched_on_preferred(cpu, p))
+ return false;
+
+ /* Otherwise, they are allowed to run on online CPU. */
return cpu_online(cpu);
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 26ae13c86b69..6de6366f2faa 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -4230,4 +4230,16 @@ DEFINE_CLASS_IS_UNCONDITIONAL(sched_change)
#include "ext/ext.h"
+static inline bool task_can_sched_on_preferred(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ if (cpu_preferred(cpu))
+ return false;
+
+ /* Only FAIR tasks honor preferred CPU state */
+ if (unlikely(p->sched_class != &fair_sched_class))
+ return false;
+
+ return cpumask_intersects(p->cpus_ptr, cpu_preferred_mask);
+}
+
#endif /* _KERNEL_SCHED_SCHED_H */
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v8 05/11] sched/fair: Load balance only among preferred CPUs
2026-07-20 17:22 [PATCH v8 00/11] sched, steal_governor: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask and steal-driven vCPU backoff Shrikanth Hegde
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 04/11] sched/core: Try to use a preferred CPU in is_cpu_allowed Shrikanth Hegde
@ 2026-07-20 17:22 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 06/11] sched/core: Push current task from non preferred CPU Shrikanth Hegde
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Shrikanth Hegde @ 2026-07-20 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, mingo, peterz, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot,
yury.norov, kprateek.nayak, iii, corbet
Cc: sshegde, tglx, gregkh, pbonzini, seanjc, vschneid, huschle,
rostedt, dietmar.eggemann, maddy, srikar, hdanton, chleroy,
vineeth, frederic, arighi, pauld, christian.loehle, tj,
tommaso.cucinotta, maz, rafael, rdunlap, kernellwp, linux-doc,
jgross, virtualization
When cpu is marked as non preferred, any load pulled towards it is
pointless since in the next tick task will be pushed out again.
So, Consider only preferred CPUs for load balance.
This makes it not fight against the push task mechanism which happens
at tick. Also, this stops active balance to happen on non-preferred CPU
pulling the load.
This means there is no load balancing if the task is pinned only to
non-preferred CPUs. They will continue to run where they were previously
running before the CPUs was marked as non-preferred.
Bailout early for NEWIDLE and IDLE balance as load balancing is done
only on preferred CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index df8c9c2c7918..12f5b7de28d2 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -13399,7 +13399,7 @@ static int sched_balance_rq(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
};
bool need_unlock = false;
- cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), cpu_active_mask);
+ cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), cpu_preferred_mask);
schedstat_inc(sd->lb_count[idle]);
@@ -14337,7 +14337,8 @@ static void _nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned int flags)
update_rq_clock(rq);
rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, &rf);
- if (flags & NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK)
+ if (flags & NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK &&
+ cpu_preferred(balance_cpu))
sched_balance_domains(rq, CPU_IDLE);
}
@@ -14481,10 +14482,8 @@ static int sched_balance_newidle(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
*/
this_rq->idle_stamp = rq_clock(this_rq);
- /*
- * Do not pull tasks towards !active CPUs...
- */
- if (!cpu_active(this_cpu))
+ /* Do not pull tasks towards !preferred CPUs */
+ if (!cpu_preferred(this_cpu))
return 0;
/*
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v8 06/11] sched/core: Push current task from non preferred CPU
2026-07-20 17:22 [PATCH v8 00/11] sched, steal_governor: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask and steal-driven vCPU backoff Shrikanth Hegde
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 05/11] sched/fair: Load balance only among preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
@ 2026-07-20 17:22 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 07/11] sched/debug: Add migration stats due to non preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Shrikanth Hegde @ 2026-07-20 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, mingo, peterz, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot,
yury.norov, kprateek.nayak, iii, corbet
Cc: sshegde, tglx, gregkh, pbonzini, seanjc, vschneid, huschle,
rostedt, dietmar.eggemann, maddy, srikar, hdanton, chleroy,
vineeth, frederic, arighi, pauld, christian.loehle, tj,
tommaso.cucinotta, maz, rafael, rdunlap, kernellwp, linux-doc,
jgross, virtualization
Actively push out task running on a non-preferred CPU. Since the task is
running on the CPU, need to stop the cpu and push the task out.
However, if the task is pinned only to non-preferred CPUs, it will continue
running there. This will help in maintaining the userspace affinities
unlike CPU hotplug or isolated cpusets.
Though code is similar to __balance_push_cpu_stop and quite close to
push_cpu_stop, it is being kept separate as it provides a cleaner
implementation with CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU.
Add push_task_work_done flag to protect work buffer.
Works only with FAIR class.
For now, only current running task is pushed out. This keeps the code
simpler. In future optimization maybe done to move all the queued
task on the rq.
Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/sched/sched.h | 8 +++++
2 files changed, 86 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 9e8eec4451b6..704043531b24 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -5774,6 +5774,9 @@ void sched_tick(void)
unsigned long hw_pressure;
u64 resched_latency;
+ if (!cpu_preferred(cpu))
+ sched_push_current_non_preferred_cpu(rq);
+
if (housekeeping_cpu(cpu, HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE))
arch_scale_freq_tick();
@@ -11292,3 +11295,78 @@ void sched_change_end(struct sched_change_ctx *ctx)
p->sched_class->prio_changed(rq, p, ctx->prio);
}
}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_stop_work, npc_push_task_work);
+
+static int sched_non_preferred_cpu_push_stop(void *arg)
+{
+ struct task_struct *p = arg;
+ struct rq *rq = this_rq();
+ struct rq_flags rf;
+ int cpu;
+
+ if (cpu_preferred(rq->cpu)) {
+ scoped_guard(rq_lock, rq)
+ rq->push_task_work_done = false;
+ put_task_struct(p);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&p->pi_lock);
+
+ /* This could take rq lock. So call it before rq lock is taken */
+ cpu = select_fallback_rq(rq->cpu, p);
+ rq_lock(rq, &rf);
+ rq->push_task_work_done = false;
+ update_rq_clock(rq);
+
+ context_unsafe_alias(rq);
+
+ if (task_rq(p) == rq && task_on_rq_queued(p) &&
+ !is_migration_disabled(p))
+ rq = __migrate_task(rq, &rf, p, cpu);
+
+ rq_unlock(rq, &rf);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&p->pi_lock);
+ put_task_struct(p);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Push the current task running on non-preferred CPU(npc).
+ * Using this non preferred CPU will lead to more contention
+ * in the host. So it is better not to use this CPU.
+ *
+ * Since task is running, call a stopper to push the task out. This is
+ * similar to how task moves during hotplug. In select_fallback_rq a
+ * preferred CPU will be chosen and henceforth task shouldn't come back to
+ * this CPU again.
+ *
+ * Works for FAIR class only.
+ *
+ * If task is affined only non-preferred CPUs, no point in moving it out.
+ */
+void sched_push_current_non_preferred_cpu(struct rq *rq)
+{
+ struct task_struct *push_task = rq->curr;
+
+ scoped_guard(rq_lock, rq) {
+ /* Push the task if its explicit affinity allows */
+ if (!task_can_sched_on_preferred(rq->cpu, push_task))
+ return;
+
+ /* There is already a stopper thread. Don't race with it. */
+ if (rq->push_task_work_done)
+ return;
+
+ rq->push_task_work_done = true;
+ }
+
+ /* sched_tick runs with interrupts disabled. */
+ get_task_struct(push_task);
+ stop_one_cpu_nowait(rq->cpu, sched_non_preferred_cpu_push_stop,
+ push_task, this_cpu_ptr(&npc_push_task_work));
+}
+#endif
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 6de6366f2faa..80c02e2c09eb 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1277,6 +1277,8 @@ struct rq {
struct list_head cfs_tasks;
+ bool push_task_work_done;
+
struct sched_avg avg_rt;
struct sched_avg avg_dl;
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SCHED_AVG_IRQ
@@ -4242,4 +4244,10 @@ static inline bool task_can_sched_on_preferred(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
return cpumask_intersects(p->cpus_ptr, cpu_preferred_mask);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU
+void sched_push_current_non_preferred_cpu(struct rq *rq);
+#else /* !CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU */
+static inline void sched_push_current_non_preferred_cpu(struct rq *rq) { }
+#endif
+
#endif /* _KERNEL_SCHED_SCHED_H */
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v8 07/11] sched/debug: Add migration stats due to non preferred CPUs
2026-07-20 17:22 [PATCH v8 00/11] sched, steal_governor: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask and steal-driven vCPU backoff Shrikanth Hegde
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 06/11] sched/core: Push current task from non preferred CPU Shrikanth Hegde
@ 2026-07-20 17:22 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 08/11] virt: Introduce steal governor driver Shrikanth Hegde
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Shrikanth Hegde @ 2026-07-20 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, mingo, peterz, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot,
yury.norov, kprateek.nayak, iii, corbet
Cc: sshegde, tglx, gregkh, pbonzini, seanjc, vschneid, huschle,
rostedt, dietmar.eggemann, maddy, srikar, hdanton, chleroy,
vineeth, frederic, arighi, pauld, christian.loehle, tj,
tommaso.cucinotta, maz, rafael, rdunlap, kernellwp, linux-doc,
jgross, virtualization
Add a new stat,
- nr_migrations_cpu_non_preferred: number of migrations happened since
a CPU was marked as non preferred due to high steal time.
Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
kernel/sched/core.c | 9 +++++++--
kernel/sched/debug.c | 1 +
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 968b18a7f470..37849d2f1dbd 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -554,6 +554,7 @@ struct sched_statistics {
u64 nr_failed_migrations_running;
u64 nr_failed_migrations_hot;
u64 nr_forced_migrations;
+ u64 nr_migrations_cpu_non_preferred;
u64 nr_wakeups;
u64 nr_wakeups_sync;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 704043531b24..f0d9bcfd35e3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -11324,8 +11324,13 @@ static int sched_non_preferred_cpu_push_stop(void *arg)
context_unsafe_alias(rq);
if (task_rq(p) == rq && task_on_rq_queued(p) &&
- !is_migration_disabled(p))
- rq = __migrate_task(rq, &rf, p, cpu);
+ !is_migration_disabled(p)) {
+ struct rq *dest_rq = __migrate_task(rq, &rf, p, cpu);
+
+ if (rq != dest_rq)
+ schedstat_inc(p->stats.nr_migrations_cpu_non_preferred);
+ rq = dest_rq;
+ }
rq_unlock(rq, &rf);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&p->pi_lock);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
index 72236db67983..5ebb2055e6d5 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
@@ -1446,6 +1446,7 @@ void proc_sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p, struct pid_namespace *ns,
P_SCHEDSTAT(nr_failed_migrations_running);
P_SCHEDSTAT(nr_failed_migrations_hot);
P_SCHEDSTAT(nr_forced_migrations);
+ P_SCHEDSTAT(nr_migrations_cpu_non_preferred);
P_SCHEDSTAT(nr_wakeups);
P_SCHEDSTAT(nr_wakeups_sync);
P_SCHEDSTAT(nr_wakeups_migrate);
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v8 08/11] virt: Introduce steal governor driver
2026-07-20 17:22 [PATCH v8 00/11] sched, steal_governor: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask and steal-driven vCPU backoff Shrikanth Hegde
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 07/11] sched/debug: Add migration stats due to non preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
@ 2026-07-20 17:22 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 09/11] virt/steal_governor: Add control knobs for handling steal values Shrikanth Hegde
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Shrikanth Hegde @ 2026-07-20 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, mingo, peterz, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot,
yury.norov, kprateek.nayak, iii, corbet
Cc: sshegde, tglx, gregkh, pbonzini, seanjc, vschneid, huschle,
rostedt, dietmar.eggemann, maddy, srikar, hdanton, chleroy,
vineeth, frederic, arighi, pauld, christian.loehle, tj,
tommaso.cucinotta, maz, rafael, rdunlap, kernellwp, linux-doc,
jgross, virtualization
Introduce a new driver in virt named steal_governor. This driver
will compute the steal time and drive the policy decisions of preferred
CPU state.
More on it can be found in the Documentation/driver-api/steal-governor.rst
There is a new kconfig called STEAL_GOVERNOR which is introduced in
subsequent patches. That driver is going to select PREFERRED_CPU.
This makes configs driven by user preference.
When the driver is disabled, preferred CPUs is same as active CPUs.
File layout of the driver is being kept simple.
- core.c - contains main driver code. This includes the periodic
work function and take action on steal time which is introduced
in subsequent patches.
- core.h - header file which includes data structure.
Main structure of steal governor has,
- work: deferred periodic work function
- steal, time: To calculate the delta in periodic work.
- interval_ms, high_threshold, low_threshold: debug knobs of
steal_governor.
While there, Add MAINTAINERS entry for this new driver.
Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/driver-api/index.rst | 1 +
Documentation/driver-api/steal-governor.rst | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++
MAINTAINERS | 9 ++
drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.c | 48 ++++++++
drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.h | 25 +++++
5 files changed, 200 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/steal-governor.rst
create mode 100644 drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.c
create mode 100644 drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.h
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/index.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/index.rst
index eaf7161ff957..0a973b59cba3 100644
--- a/Documentation/driver-api/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/index.rst
@@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ Subsystem-specific APIs
sm501
soundwire/index
spi
+ steal-governor
surface_aggregator/index
switchtec
sync_file
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/steal-governor.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/steal-governor.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1039d598fc2c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/steal-governor.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+==============
+Steal Governor
+==============
+
+:Author: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
+
+Introduction
+============
+
+Steal governor is a driver aimed at solving the Noisy Neighbour problem
+in paravirtualized environments. The performance of workload
+running in one VM gets affected significantly due to other VMs and
+combined they make slower forward progress.
+
+When there is overcommit of CPU resources, i.e. sum of virtual CPUs (vCPUs)
+of all VMs is greater than number of physical CPUs (pCPUs) and
+when all or many VMs have high utilization, hypervisor won't be able
+to satisfy the CPU requirement and has to context switch within or
+across VMs. I.e. the hypervisor needs to preempt one vCPU to run
+another. This is called vCPU preemption.
+This is more expensive compared to task context switch within a vCPU.
+
+In such cases it is better that combined vCPU ask from all VMs is reduced
+by not using some of the vCPUs. vCPUs where workload can be safely
+scheduled which won't increase any contention for pCPU are called as
+"Preferred CPUs".
+
+See more on "Preferred CPUs" in Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst.
+
+This driver makes CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU=y which enables the scheduler core
+infrastructure to move tasks to Preferred CPUs where possible.
+
+Core idea
+=========
+
+steal time is an indication available today in Guest which shows contention
+for underlying physical CPU. Use it as a hint in the guest to fold the
+workload to a reduced set of vCPUs. When there is contention, steal time
+will show up in all the guests. When each guest honors the hint and folds
+the workload to a smaller set of vCPUs (Preferred CPUs), it reduces the
+contention and thereby reduces vCPU preemption.
+This is achieved without any cross-guest communication.
+
+Steal governor driver effectively does:
+
+1. Periodically computes steal time across the system.
+
+2. If steal time is greater than high threshold, reduce the number of
+ preferred CPUs by 1 core. Ensure at least one core is left always.
+
+3. If steal time is lower or equal to low threshold, increase the
+ number of preferred CPUs by 1 core. If preferred is same as active,
+ nothing to be done.
+
+4. Ensure preferred CPUs is always subset of active CPUs.
+ On feature disable it is same as active CPUs.
+
+This feature works best only when all the VMs enable the feature as
+it is a co-operative scheme. If a specific VM doesn't enable this feature
+it may end up with more CPUs than others, still should lead to better
+performance when seen from system view.
+Those who enable this driver must ensure it is enabled in all VMs.
+
+Module Parameters
+=================
+
+interval_ms
+-----------
+
+How often steal governor checks for steal time.
+Default: 1000 i.e 1 second. Value should be in between 100ms to 100sec.
+
+This controls how fast steal governor driver reacts to changes to
+the contention of physical CPUs. Since it does a fair amount of
+work, setting too low may have overhead. Setting it too
+high might render it ineffective.
+
+low_threshold
+-------------
+
+lower threshold value in percentage * 100.
+Default: 200, i.e 2% steal is considered as low threshold.
+Can't be higher than high_threshold.
+
+This determines what values should be considered as nil/no steal values.
+When steal governor see steal time is below or equal to this value, it
+will increase the preferred CPUs by 1 core. Having value as zero
+might cause oscillations.
+
+high_threshold
+--------------
+
+higher threshold value in percentage * 100
+Default: 500, i.e 5% steal is considered as high threshold.
+Can't be lower than low_threshold. Must be less than 10000.
+
+This determines what values should be considered as high steal values.
+When steal governor sees steal time is higher than this value, it will
+reduce the preferred CPUs by 1 core.
+
+Notes
+=====
+
+Selecting this driver makes CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU=y. That makes configs
+driven by user preference.
+
+It is recommended to build CONFIG_STEAL_GOVERNOR=m due to below reasons:
+
+1. Doing periodic work has additional overheads. Enabling this driver
+ in systems where steal time cannot happen is of no use. There is no
+ benefit with additional overheads in such systems.
+
+2. This works well when all VMs work in co-operative manner. When an
+ administrative user enables it in one VM, he/she will likely enable
+ it all VMs.
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 15011f5752a9..0906684b2243 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -25914,6 +25914,15 @@ F: rust/helpers/jump_label.c
F: rust/kernel/generated_arch_static_branch_asm.rs.S
F: rust/kernel/jump_label.rs
+STEAL GOVERNOR DRIVER
+M: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
+R: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
+L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+S: Maintained
+T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git sched/core
+F: Documentation/driver-api/steal-governor.rst
+F: drivers/virt/steal_governor/
+
STI AUDIO (ASoC) DRIVERS
M: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
L: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org
diff --git a/drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.c b/drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..055f155d2045
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.c
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Steal time governor driver periodically computes steal time.
+ * Based on the thresholds it either reduce/increase the preferred
+ * CPUs which can be used by the workload to avoid vCPU preemption
+ * to an extent possible in paravirtualized environment.
+ *
+ * Available as module with CONFIG_STEAL_GOVERNOR
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2026 IBM
+ * Author: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
+ */
+
+#include "core.h"
+
+#if !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU)
+#error "Steal Governor requires CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU"
+#endif
+
+static struct steal_governor sg_core_ctx;
+
+static void restore_preferred_to_active(void)
+{
+ int cpu;
+
+ guard(cpus_read_lock)();
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_active_mask)
+ set_cpu_preferred(cpu, true);
+}
+
+static int __init steal_governor_init(void)
+{
+ pr_info("steal_governor is enabled\n");
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void __exit steal_governor_exit(void)
+{
+ restore_preferred_to_active();
+ pr_info("steal_governor is disabled\n");
+}
+
+module_init(steal_governor_init);
+module_exit(steal_governor_exit);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("IBM Corporation");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Virtualization Steal Time Governor");
diff --git a/drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.h b/drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e27305284ac0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.h
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+#ifndef __VIRT_STEAL_CORE_H
+#define __VIRT_STEAL_CORE_H
+
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/cpuhplock.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
+#include <linux/ktime.h>
+#include <linux/kconfig.h>
+
+struct steal_governor {
+ struct delayed_work work;
+ ktime_t time;
+ u64 steal;
+ unsigned int interval_ms;
+ unsigned int high_threshold;
+ unsigned int low_threshold;
+};
+
+#endif /* __VIRT_STEAL_CORE_H */
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v8 09/11] virt/steal_governor: Add control knobs for handling steal values
2026-07-20 17:22 [PATCH v8 00/11] sched, steal_governor: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask and steal-driven vCPU backoff Shrikanth Hegde
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 08/11] virt: Introduce steal governor driver Shrikanth Hegde
@ 2026-07-20 17:22 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 10/11] virt/steal_governor: Implement steal_governor policy loop Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 11/11] virt/steal_governor: Enable the driver Shrikanth Hegde
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Shrikanth Hegde @ 2026-07-20 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, mingo, peterz, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot,
yury.norov, kprateek.nayak, iii, corbet
Cc: sshegde, tglx, gregkh, pbonzini, seanjc, vschneid, huschle,
rostedt, dietmar.eggemann, maddy, srikar, hdanton, chleroy,
vineeth, frederic, arighi, pauld, christian.loehle, tj,
tommaso.cucinotta, maz, rafael, rdunlap, kernellwp, linux-doc,
jgross, virtualization
These are the knobs to control the steal_governor.
interval_ms:
How often steal governor checks for steal time.
(Default: 1000 i.e 1 second)
This controls how fast steal governor driver reacts to changes to
the contention of physical CPUs.
Can be set between 100 to 100000. i.e. 100ms to 100seconds.
100ms is kept as minimum to ensure few meaningful steal values
accumulate even with HZ=100.
low_threshold:
lower threshold value in percentage * 100.
(Default: 200, i.e 2% steal is considered as low threshold)
This determines what values should be considered as nil/no steal values.
When steal governor see steal time is below or equal to this value, it
will increase the preferred CPUs by 1 core. Having value as zero
might cause oscillations
high_threshold:
higher threshold value in percentage * 100
(Default: 500, i.e 5% steal is considered as high threshold)
This determines what values should be considered as high steal values.
When steal governor sees steal time is higher than this value, it will
reduce the preferred CPUs by 1 core.
module_param_cb methods are used to do the validation checks.
This helps to ensure one configures sane values.
Since low and high are dependent, that check is done at module init.
Parameters values can't be changed at runtime. One has to unload
the module and change it. Hence recommended to build it as module.
Also available at: Documentation/driver-api/steal-governor.rst
Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.c b/drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.c
index 055f155d2045..1cb766a8ce28 100644
--- a/drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.c
+++ b/drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.c
@@ -17,7 +17,11 @@
#error "Steal Governor requires CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU"
#endif
-static struct steal_governor sg_core_ctx;
+static struct steal_governor sg_core_ctx = {
+ .interval_ms = 1000, /* 1 second */
+ .high_threshold = 500, /* 5% */
+ .low_threshold = 200, /* 2% */
+};
static void restore_preferred_to_active(void)
{
@@ -28,9 +32,74 @@ static void restore_preferred_to_active(void)
set_cpu_preferred(cpu, true);
}
+static int param_set_interval_ms(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
+{
+ unsigned int interval;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = kstrtouint(val, 0, &interval);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (interval < 100 || interval > 100000) {
+ pr_err("steal_governor: interval_ms must be between 100 and 100000\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return param_set_uint(val, kp);
+}
+
+static const struct kernel_param_ops interval_ms_ops = {
+ .set = param_set_interval_ms,
+ .get = param_get_uint,
+};
+
+module_param_cb(interval_ms, &interval_ms_ops, &sg_core_ctx.interval_ms, 0444);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(interval_ms,
+ "Sampling frequency in milliseconds. default: 1000");
+
+static int param_set_high_threshold(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
+{
+ unsigned int threshold;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = kstrtouint(val, 0, &threshold);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (threshold >= 100 * 100) {
+ pr_err("steal_governor: high_threshold (%u) can't be more than 99.99%%\n",
+ threshold);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return param_set_uint(val, kp);
+}
+
+static const struct kernel_param_ops high_threshold_ops = {
+ .set = param_set_high_threshold,
+ .get = param_get_uint,
+};
+
+module_param_cb(high_threshold, &high_threshold_ops, &sg_core_ctx.high_threshold, 0444);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(high_threshold,
+ "High steal threshold. default: 500 i.e 5%. Must be > low_threshold");
+
+module_param_named(low_threshold, sg_core_ctx.low_threshold, uint, 0444);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(low_threshold,
+ "Low steal threshold. default: 200 i.e 2%. Must be < high_threshold");
+
static int __init steal_governor_init(void)
{
- pr_info("steal_governor is enabled\n");
+ if (sg_core_ctx.low_threshold >= sg_core_ctx.high_threshold) {
+ pr_err("steal_governor: low_threshold (%u) must be less than high_threshold (%u)\n",
+ sg_core_ctx.low_threshold, sg_core_ctx.high_threshold);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ pr_info("steal_governor is enabled. interval: %ums, high_threshold: %u, low_threshold: %u\n",
+ sg_core_ctx.interval_ms, sg_core_ctx.high_threshold, sg_core_ctx.low_threshold);
+
return 0;
}
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v8 10/11] virt/steal_governor: Implement steal_governor policy loop
2026-07-20 17:22 [PATCH v8 00/11] sched, steal_governor: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask and steal-driven vCPU backoff Shrikanth Hegde
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 09/11] virt/steal_governor: Add control knobs for handling steal values Shrikanth Hegde
@ 2026-07-20 17:22 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 11/11] virt/steal_governor: Enable the driver Shrikanth Hegde
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Shrikanth Hegde @ 2026-07-20 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, mingo, peterz, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot,
yury.norov, kprateek.nayak, iii, corbet
Cc: sshegde, tglx, gregkh, pbonzini, seanjc, vschneid, huschle,
rostedt, dietmar.eggemann, maddy, srikar, hdanton, chleroy,
vineeth, frederic, arighi, pauld, christian.loehle, tj,
tommaso.cucinotta, maz, rafael, rdunlap, kernellwp, linux-doc,
jgross, virtualization
schedule work at regular intervals to implement the steal_governor
policy of monitoring the steal time and take action on the state of
preferred CPUs. The interval is determined by interval_ms parameter.
schedule_delayed_work is used since interval_ms
is in the order of milliseconds. Work need not happen instantly.
Periodic policy loop essentially does:
- Gets the total/delta steal values and cpus to use steal_ratio.
(get_system_steal_time, get_num_cpus_steal_ratio)
- Calculate the steal_ratio as below.
steal_ratio = (delta_steal * 100*100)/(delta_ns * num_cpus())
It is calculated to consider the fractional values of steal time.
I.e 10 means 0.1% steal time. A few tricks such as divide by 10,000
are used to avoid possible overflow.
- If steal value is higher than high threshold, call the method to reduce
the preferred CPUs. (decrease_preferred_cpus)
- If steal value is lower or equal to low threshold, call the method to
increase the preferred CPUs. (increase_preferred_cpus)
- If the steal value is in between, no action is taken.
- Save the values for next delta calculations.
- Ensure design checks are met.
1. At least one core/CPU must be there in preferred mask.
2. preferred CPUs is subset of active CPUs.
If not met, then restore preferred CPUs to active and stop
requeue of the work. Driver is effectively non-functional after that.
In Order to help the above loop, a few helper functions have been added.
1. get_system_steal_time()
- steal governor takes global view of steal time instead of individual
vCPU. Collect the steal values across the vCPUs of interest.
- Sum up steal time values across possible CPUs. This helps to keep it
a monotonically increasing number and avoids spikes due to CPU
hotplug.
2. decrease_preferred_cpus()
- Called when there is high steal time. It needs to decide which CPUs to
mark as non-preferred and set that state.
- Get first housekeeping CPU and its core mask. Mark it as
protected core. This helps to keep at least one core as preferred.
kernel ensures at least one housekeeping CPU stays active.
- Find the last CPU outside of this protected core mask. (target CPU)
- Based on that target CPU, get its sibling and mark them as
non-preferred.
3. increase_preferred_cpus()
- Called when there is low steal time. It needs to decide which CPUs to
mark as preferred and set that state.
- Get the first active non-preferred CPUs. This likely is the last
set of CPUs being marked as non-preferred.
- get the siblings of that CPU and mark them as preferred.
4. get_num_cpus_steal_ratio()
- informs how many CPUs needs to be considered for steal_ratio
calculations.
- Return number of possible CPUs as get_system_steal_time computes
steal values across possible CPUs.
Notes:
1. Using core instead of individual CPUs performs better as SMT is
quite common and some hypervisor such as powerVM does core scheduling.
2. This doesn't do any NUMA splicing to keep the code simpler and
minimal overhead. Current code expects CPUs spread uniformly
across NUMA nodes.
Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.c | 160 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.h | 5 +
2 files changed, 165 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.c b/drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.c
index 1cb766a8ce28..97f82d6df60f 100644
--- a/drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.c
+++ b/drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.c
@@ -89,6 +89,158 @@ module_param_named(low_threshold, sg_core_ctx.low_threshold, uint, 0444);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(low_threshold,
"Low steal threshold. default: 200 i.e 2%. Must be < high_threshold");
+/*
+ * Returns steal time of the full system.
+ * Compute collective steal time across all possible CPUs.
+ */
+static u64 get_system_steal_time(void)
+{
+ int cpu;
+ u64 total_steal = 0;
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+ total_steal += kcpustat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[CPUTIME_STEAL];
+
+ return total_steal;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Returns number of CPUs to consider for steal ratio.
+ * Return possible CPUs.
+ */
+static unsigned int get_num_cpus_steal_ratio(void)
+{
+ return num_possible_cpus();
+}
+
+/*
+ * Take action to decrease preferred CPUs.
+ *
+ * Decrease the preferred CPUs by 1 core.
+ * Take out the last core in the active & preferred.
+ *
+ * Must ensure
+ * - least one housekeeping core is always kept as preferred
+ * - preferred is always subset of active.
+ */
+static void decrease_preferred_cpus(void)
+{
+ int tmp_cpu, first_hk_cpu, last_cpu;
+ const struct cpumask *first_hk_core;
+ int target_cpu = nr_cpu_ids;
+
+ guard(cpus_read_lock)();
+ first_hk_cpu = cpumask_first_and(housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE),
+ cpu_preferred_mask);
+ if (first_hk_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
+ return;
+
+ last_cpu = cpumask_last(cpu_preferred_mask);
+
+ if (last_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
+ return;
+
+ /* Always leave first housekeeping core as preferred. */
+ first_hk_core = topology_sibling_cpumask(first_hk_cpu);
+
+ /* Find the last CPU which doesn't belong to that first hk_core. */
+ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(last_cpu, first_hk_core)) {
+ target_cpu = last_cpu;
+ } else {
+ for_each_cpu_andnot(tmp_cpu, cpu_preferred_mask, first_hk_core)
+ target_cpu = tmp_cpu;
+ }
+
+ /* Only the first housekeeping core remains */
+ if (target_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
+ return;
+
+ for_each_cpu_and(tmp_cpu, topology_sibling_cpumask(target_cpu),
+ cpu_preferred_mask)
+ set_cpu_preferred(tmp_cpu, false);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Take action to increase preferred CPUs.
+ *
+ * Increase the preferred CPUs by 1 core.
+ * Add the first core in active & !preferred
+ *
+ * Must ensure preferred is subset of active.
+ */
+static void increase_preferred_cpus(void)
+{
+ int first_cpu, tmp_cpu;
+
+ guard(cpus_read_lock)();
+ first_cpu = cpumask_first_andnot(cpu_active_mask, cpu_preferred_mask);
+
+ /* All CPUs are preferred. Nothing to increase further */
+ if (first_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
+ return;
+
+ for_each_cpu_and(tmp_cpu, topology_sibling_cpumask(first_cpu),
+ cpu_active_mask)
+ set_cpu_preferred(tmp_cpu, true);
+}
+
+static void compute_preferred_cpus_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ u64 curr_steal, delta_steal, delta_ns, steal_ratio;
+ ktime_t now;
+
+ now = ktime_get();
+ delta_ns = ktime_to_ns(ktime_sub(now, sg_core_ctx.time));
+
+ if (unlikely(delta_ns < NSEC_PER_MSEC)) {
+ pr_err_ratelimited("steal_governor: work scheduled too soon delta_ns: %llu\n",
+ delta_ns);
+ goto requeue_work;
+ }
+
+ curr_steal = get_system_steal_time();
+ delta_steal = curr_steal > sg_core_ctx.steal ?
+ curr_steal - sg_core_ctx.steal : 0;
+
+ /* Update for next calculation */
+ sg_core_ctx.steal = curr_steal;
+ sg_core_ctx.time = now;
+
+ /*
+ * steal_ratio = (delta_steal * 100*100)/(delta_ns * num_cpus())
+ * To avoid possible overflow, divide the denominator early.
+ * Note minimum interval is 100ms.
+ */
+ delta_ns = max_t(u64, div_u64(delta_ns * get_num_cpus_steal_ratio(),
+ 100 * 100), 1);
+ steal_ratio = div64_u64(delta_steal, delta_ns);
+
+ if (steal_ratio > sg_core_ctx.high_threshold)
+ decrease_preferred_cpus();
+ if (steal_ratio <= sg_core_ctx.low_threshold)
+ increase_preferred_cpus();
+
+ /* maintain design constructs always */
+ if (cpumask_empty(cpu_preferred_mask)) {
+ pr_err("empty preferred mask. stop steal governor\n");
+ restore_preferred_to_active();
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (!cpumask_subset(cpu_preferred_mask, cpu_active_mask)) {
+ pr_err("preferred: %*pbl is not subset of active: %*pbl, stop steal governor\n",
+ cpumask_pr_args(cpu_preferred_mask),
+ cpumask_pr_args(cpu_active_mask));
+ restore_preferred_to_active();
+ return;
+ }
+
+requeue_work:
+ /* Trigger for next sampling */
+ schedule_delayed_work(&sg_core_ctx.work,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(sg_core_ctx.interval_ms));
+}
+
static int __init steal_governor_init(void)
{
if (sg_core_ctx.low_threshold >= sg_core_ctx.high_threshold) {
@@ -100,11 +252,19 @@ static int __init steal_governor_init(void)
pr_info("steal_governor is enabled. interval: %ums, high_threshold: %u, low_threshold: %u\n",
sg_core_ctx.interval_ms, sg_core_ctx.high_threshold, sg_core_ctx.low_threshold);
+ INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&sg_core_ctx.work, compute_preferred_cpus_work);
+ sg_core_ctx.steal = get_system_steal_time();
+ sg_core_ctx.time = ktime_get();
+
+ schedule_delayed_work(&sg_core_ctx.work,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(sg_core_ctx.interval_ms));
+
return 0;
}
static void __exit steal_governor_exit(void)
{
+ disable_delayed_work_sync(&sg_core_ctx.work);
restore_preferred_to_active();
pr_info("steal_governor is disabled\n");
}
diff --git a/drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.h b/drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.h
index e27305284ac0..59329c1d7109 100644
--- a/drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.h
+++ b/drivers/virt/steal_governor/core.h
@@ -12,6 +12,11 @@
#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#include <linux/ktime.h>
#include <linux/kconfig.h>
+#include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
+#include <linux/topology.h>
+#include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
+#include <linux/cleanup.h>
+#include <linux/math64.h>
struct steal_governor {
struct delayed_work work;
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v8 11/11] virt/steal_governor: Enable the driver
2026-07-20 17:22 [PATCH v8 00/11] sched, steal_governor: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask and steal-driven vCPU backoff Shrikanth Hegde
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 10/11] virt/steal_governor: Implement steal_governor policy loop Shrikanth Hegde
@ 2026-07-20 17:22 ` Shrikanth Hegde
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Shrikanth Hegde @ 2026-07-20 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, mingo, peterz, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot,
yury.norov, kprateek.nayak, iii, corbet
Cc: sshegde, tglx, gregkh, pbonzini, seanjc, vschneid, huschle,
rostedt, dietmar.eggemann, maddy, srikar, hdanton, chleroy,
vineeth, frederic, arighi, pauld, christian.loehle, tj,
tommaso.cucinotta, maz, rafael, rdunlap, kernellwp, linux-doc,
jgross, virtualization
Provide a config option for users to enable the driver.
Since the feature works for paravirtualized case and make sense only
with SMP, enforce those dependencies. Driver is going to select
CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU=y for scheduler mechanisms to work.
It is recommended to build the driver as module instead of yes
due to below reasons.
- Module parameters are read only after init. If one wants to change
them having as module allows that.
- Driver can be disabled if it is built as module.
- If it is module, admin user has to enable it. Since this feature works
best when all VMs work in co-operative manner, admin will likely
enable it in all VMs.
Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/virt/Kconfig | 2 ++
drivers/virt/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/virt/steal_governor/Kconfig | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
drivers/virt/steal_governor/Makefile | 6 ++++++
4 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/virt/steal_governor/Kconfig
create mode 100644 drivers/virt/steal_governor/Makefile
diff --git a/drivers/virt/Kconfig b/drivers/virt/Kconfig
index 52eb7e4ba71f..4fbc928022a4 100644
--- a/drivers/virt/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/virt/Kconfig
@@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ source "drivers/virt/nitro_enclaves/Kconfig"
source "drivers/virt/acrn/Kconfig"
+source "drivers/virt/steal_governor/Kconfig"
+
endif
source "drivers/virt/coco/Kconfig"
diff --git a/drivers/virt/Makefile b/drivers/virt/Makefile
index f29901bd7820..512dcfd6c73e 100644
--- a/drivers/virt/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/virt/Makefile
@@ -10,3 +10,4 @@ obj-y += vboxguest/
obj-$(CONFIG_NITRO_ENCLAVES) += nitro_enclaves/
obj-$(CONFIG_ACRN_HSM) += acrn/
obj-y += coco/
+obj-$(CONFIG_STEAL_GOVERNOR) += steal_governor/
diff --git a/drivers/virt/steal_governor/Kconfig b/drivers/virt/steal_governor/Kconfig
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..926bb351db4f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/virt/steal_governor/Kconfig
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+config STEAL_GOVERNOR
+ tristate "Dynamic vCPU management based on steal time"
+ depends on PARAVIRT && SMP
+ select PREFERRED_CPU
+ default m
+ help
+ This driver helps to reduce the steal time in paravirtualised
+ environment, thereby reducing vCPU preemption. Reducing vCPU
+ preemption provides improved lock holder preemption and reduces
+ cost of vCPU preemption in the host.
+
+ By default preferred CPUs will be same as active CPUs. Depending
+ on the steal time when steal_governor driver is enabled,
+ preferred CPUs could become subset of active CPUs.
+
+ It is recommended to build it as module and load the module
+ to enable it.
diff --git a/drivers/virt/steal_governor/Makefile b/drivers/virt/steal_governor/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..eb90ed6b94d7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/virt/steal_governor/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+#
+# Steal time governor to alter preferred CPU state.
+obj-$(CONFIG_STEAL_GOVERNOR) += steal_governor.o
+
+steal_governor-y := core.o
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-20 17:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-20 17:22 [PATCH v8 00/11] sched, steal_governor: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask and steal-driven vCPU backoff Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 01/11] sched/docs: Document cpu_preferred_mask and Preferred CPU concept Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 02/11] cpumask: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 03/11] sysfs: Add preferred CPU file Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 04/11] sched/core: Try to use a preferred CPU in is_cpu_allowed Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 05/11] sched/fair: Load balance only among preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 06/11] sched/core: Push current task from non preferred CPU Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 07/11] sched/debug: Add migration stats due to non preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 08/11] virt: Introduce steal governor driver Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 09/11] virt/steal_governor: Add control knobs for handling steal values Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 10/11] virt/steal_governor: Implement steal_governor policy loop Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-20 17:22 ` [PATCH v8 11/11] virt/steal_governor: Enable the driver Shrikanth Hegde
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox