[RFC PATCH 00/10] mm/damon: cleanup code, add test cases, and update guidances in docs

[RFC PATCH 00/10] mm/damon: cleanup code, add test cases, and update guidances in docs

[SJ Park]

Misc cleanup, improvements and updates of code, test, and documents.

Patches 1-3 cleanup DAMON code.  Patches 4-8 adds kunit and selftest
test cases for recently fixed bugs and a new feature.  Patches 9 and 10
update guidelines for AI review and what document to read, on DAMON
documents.

SJ Park (10):
  mm/damon/core: use damon_nr_samples_per_aggr() for max merge threshold
  mm/damon/core: remove debug messages
  mm/damon/vaddr: remove a debug message
  mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: extend set_regions() test for error case
  mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: test <=0 size damon_set_regions() inputs
  mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: test overlapping ranges for set_regions()
  mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: test damon_nr_samples_per_aggr()
  selftests/damon/sysfs.sh: test hugepage_mem_bp quota goal
  Docs/mm/damon/maintainer-profile: update AI review for Sashiko replies
  Docs/ABI/damon: recommend subsystem doc instead of admin-guide

 .../ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-mm-damon         |  2 +-
 Documentation/mm/damon/maintainer-profile.rst | 19 ++----
 mm/damon/core.c                               | 12 +---
 mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h                   | 60 ++++++++++++++++---
 mm/damon/vaddr.c                              | 11 +---
 tools/testing/selftests/damon/sysfs.sh        |  1 +
 6 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)


base-commit: f5d0a1c210a9bec33ee6cc888f4cc6dd1f56eda7
-- 
2.47.3

[RFC PATCH 09/10] Docs/mm/damon/maintainer-profile: update AI review for Sashiko replies

[SJ Park]

In the past, sharing Sashiko review results was tedious.  Also it was
suggested to minimize the recipients on the sharing mails.  Hence the AI
review section of DAMON maintainer profile document was updated to give
guidance about available tools for making the sharing easier, and how
the recipients list should be managed.

Now DAMON is onboarded [1] to Sashiko's automatic review replies
feature.  Sashiko directly sends its reviews as replies to the patch
mail thread. It also reduces the recipients list to deliver the
reporting to only the author and the mailing list.

Remove the old guidance that is no more necessary but only confusing.

[1] https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko/commit/b554c7b6e733

Signed-off-by: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
---
 Documentation/mm/damon/maintainer-profile.rst | 19 +++++--------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/mm/damon/maintainer-profile.rst b/Documentation/mm/damon/maintainer-profile.rst
index fb2fa00cc9aa1..a7c1352339378 100644
--- a/Documentation/mm/damon/maintainer-profile.rst
+++ b/Documentation/mm/damon/maintainer-profile.rst
@@ -106,18 +106,9 @@ AI Review
 
 For patches that are publicly posted to DAMON mailing list
 (damon@lists.linux.dev), AI reviews of the patches will be available at
-sashiko.dev.  The reviews could also be sent as mails to the author of the
-patch.
-
-Patch authors are encouraged to check the AI reviews and share their opinions.
-The sharing could be done as a reply to the mail thread.  Consider reducing the
-recipients list for such sharing, since some people are not really interested
-in AI reviews.  As a rule of thumb, drop stable@vger.kernel.org and individuals
-except DAMON maintainer.
-
-`hkml` also provides a `feature
-<https://github.com/sjp38/hackermail/blob/master/USAGE.md#forwarding-sashikodev-statuscomments-to-mailing-list>`_
-for such sharing.  Please feel free to use the feature.
+sashiko.dev.  The reviews will also be sent as replies to the author of the
+patch and the mailing list.
 
-It is only an optional recommendation.  DAMON maintainer could also ask any
-question about the AI reviews, though.
+Patch authors are encouraged to check the AI reviews and share their opinions
+by replying on the mail thread.  It is only an optional recommendation.  DAMON
+maintainer could also ask any question about the AI reviews, though.
-- 
2.47.3