* [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: Fix the struct bpf_cpumask name in kfuncs.rst
@ 2026-09-05 9:55 Karl Mehltretter
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Karl Mehltretter @ 2026-09-05 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: Karl Mehltretter, Eduard Zingerman, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi,
Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, Jiri Olsa, bpf,
Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc, Shuah Khan, Randy Dunlap,
David Vernet
struct bpf_cpmuask does not exist; the name is struct bpf_cpumask.
Use it.
Fixes: 027bdec89364 ("bpf/docs: Document the nocast aliasing behavior of ___init")
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst b/Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst
index 85f73e0bbd0f..57831eda0a33 100644
--- a/Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst
+++ b/Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst
@@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ For example, for the following type definition:
The verifier would allow a ``struct bpf_cpumask *`` to be passed to a kfunc
taking a ``cpumask_t *`` (which is a typedef of ``struct cpumask *``). For
-instance, both ``struct cpumask *`` and ``struct bpf_cpmuask *`` can be passed
+instance, both ``struct cpumask *`` and ``struct bpf_cpumask *`` can be passed
to bpf_cpumask_test_cpu().
In some cases, this type-aliasing behavior is not desired. ``struct
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2026-09-05 9:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-05 9:55 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: Fix the struct bpf_cpumask name in kfuncs.rst Karl Mehltretter
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox