From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
To: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] mm/shmem_luo: Allow retrieving tmpfs files with O_RDONLY
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2026 15:11:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2vxzse1ehwxa.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <auuzKNZsPD10XM4q@google.com> (David Matlack's message of "Wed, 4 Nov 2026 22:35:20 +0000")
On Wed, Nov 04 2026, David Matlack wrote:
> On 2026-11-04 02:45 PM, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
>> On 11-04 17:52, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 03 2026, David Matlack wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >
>> > Can't you put all your binaries in a separate session, retrieve it as
>> > the very first thing, and then finish the session? Then you can execute
>> > those and retrieve all the other sessions.
>>
>> This is a good workaround. I am not opposed to this patch for
>> completeness of functionality, but if we decide to keep it, perhaps it
>> should simply be squashed into an earlier patch. The current diffstat
>> looks bad, as it mostly deletes code that was introduced earlier in this
>> series.
>>
>> In any case, given Pratyush's suggestion, we could also drop it.
>>
>> >
>> > Why do we need to support this in the kernel?
>
> That would work for binaries, and I agree that use case alone doesn't
> justify this. But I see O_RDONLY as part of the retrieve interface, not
> a feature for one use case. The retrieve argument is modeled on
> openat(), and openat() lets you open an existing file read-only.
>
> open(O_TMPFILE) only requires write access because it creates an empty
> file, and an empty read-only file is useless. A retrieved file isn't
> empty, it has the preserved contents, so O_RDONLY makes as much sense as
> it does for any other existing file. Without it, every retrieved file is
> writable, even when userspace only needs to read it.
>
> Preserve already works the same way: a file can be preserved through a
> read-only fd, as long as the caller has permission to write to it.
>
> If we keep it, I'll squash it into patch 7 in v4, so retrieve supports
> O_RDONLY from the start. The commit message will lead with the openat()
> reasoning and keep binaries as just an example.
I'm guessing this all goes away after you do Christian's suggestion? I
don't think we should be retrieving anything into a file that userspace
has opened O_RDONLY. Retrieval is in effect a write operation. So
userspace _has_ to retrieve a file and reopen it O_RDONLY after
finishing the session.
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-03 1:02 [PATCH v3 00/10] liveupdate: Preserve tmpfs files across Live Update David Matlack
2026-11-03 1:02 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] liveupdate: Pass user argument to file preserve and retrieve David Matlack
2026-11-04 13:17 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-11-03 1:02 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] selftests: liveupdate: Add tests for preserve and retrieve user argument David Matlack
2026-11-04 13:26 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-11-03 1:02 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] liveupdate: Allow file handlers to mark retrieve failures as retryable David Matlack
2026-11-04 14:12 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-11-04 16:15 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-03 1:02 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] mm: Rename memfd_luo to shmem_luo David Matlack
2026-11-04 14:25 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-11-03 1:02 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] liveupdate: Don't WARN if tracking a retrieved file fails David Matlack
2026-11-04 14:32 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-11-03 1:02 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] mm/shmem_luo: Don't make early retrieve failures permanent David Matlack
2026-11-04 15:01 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-11-04 22:28 ` David Matlack
2026-11-06 14:14 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-11-03 1:02 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] mm/shmem_luo: Retrieve tmpfs files onto a tmpfs mount chosen by userspace David Matlack
2026-11-04 0:43 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-04 16:27 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-11-04 22:30 ` David Matlack
2026-11-06 14:20 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-11-03 1:02 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] mm/shmem_luo: Allow preserving tmpfs files that are still linked David Matlack
2026-11-04 0:43 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-04 16:45 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-11-04 22:32 ` David Matlack
2026-11-04 23:38 ` David Matlack
2026-11-03 1:02 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] mm/shmem_luo: Allow retrieving tmpfs files with O_RDONLY David Matlack
2026-11-04 0:43 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-04 16:52 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-11-04 19:45 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-04 22:35 ` David Matlack
2026-11-06 14:11 ` Pratyush Yadav [this message]
2026-11-03 1:02 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] selftests/liveupdate: Add a test for preserving tmpfs files David Matlack
2026-11-04 0:43 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-04 16:59 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-11-04 19:37 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-04 22:42 ` David Matlack
2026-11-06 14:19 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-11-05 15:42 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] liveupdate: Preserve tmpfs files across Live Update Christian Brauner
2026-11-05 16:52 ` David Matlack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2vxzse1ehwxa.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox