From: <Marius.Cristea@microchip.com>
To: <conor@kernel.org>, <janani.sunil@analog.com>
Cc: <corbet@lwn.net>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <robh@kernel.org>,
<andy@kernel.org>, <nedo80@gmail.com>, <kent@minoris.se>,
<Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>, <jan.sun97@gmail.com>,
<lars@metafoo.de>, <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
<linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
<dlechner@baylibre.com>, <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
<p.zabel@pengutronix.de>, <jic23@kernel.org>,
<marcus.folkesson@gmail.com>, <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
<linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>, <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/7] iio: adc: mcp3564: Add support for spi-device-addr
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 17:02:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b5253f88b8363727dedee9481212e5be222bc9f.camel@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260722-violet-dayroom-f1ec88771772@spud>
On Wed, 2026-07-22 at 17:45 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 09:54:15AM +0200, Janani Sunil wrote:
> > Read the generic spi-device-addr property when determining the
> > hardware
> > device address. Fall back to the deprecated microchip,hw-device-
> > address
> > property to preserve compatibility with existing device trees.
> >
> > The device address remains 1 when neither property is present.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Janani Sunil <janani.sunil@analog.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/adc/mcp3564.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/mcp3564.c b/drivers/iio/adc/mcp3564.c
> > index 36675563829e..71deb05e878e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/mcp3564.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/mcp3564.c
> > @@ -1122,7 +1122,9 @@ static int mcp3564_config(struct iio_dev
> > *indio_dev, bool *use_internal_vref_att
> > * addresses are available when multiple devices are
> > present on the same
> > * SPI bus with only one Chip Select line for all devices.
> > */
> > - device_property_read_u32(dev, "microchip,hw-device-
> > address", &tmp);
> > + ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "spi-device-addr",
> > &tmp);
> > + if (ret)
> > + device_property_read_u32(dev, "microchip,hw-
> > device-address", &tmp);
>
> Same on this one, shouldn't it check the return value so that the
> below
> check of temp > 3 doesn't just pass with the default value of tmp?
>
Default hardware address is 0x01, unless a special order with custom
hardware address is made. I think is safe to try to communicate with
the default HW address.
> >
> > if (tmp > 3) {
> > dev_err_probe(dev, tmp,
> >
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-22 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-22 7:54 [PATCH v7 0/7] iio: dac: Add support for AD5529R DAC Janani Sunil
2026-07-22 7:54 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] spi: dt-bindings: Add spi-device-addr peripheral property Janani Sunil
2026-07-22 16:39 ` Conor Dooley
2026-07-22 7:54 ` [PATCH v7 2/7] dt-bindings: iio: adc: microchip,mcp3564: Add spi-device-addr Janani Sunil
2026-07-22 16:40 ` Conor Dooley
2026-07-22 7:54 ` [PATCH v7 3/7] iio: adc: mcp3564: Add support for spi-device-addr Janani Sunil
2026-07-22 16:45 ` Conor Dooley
2026-07-22 17:02 ` Marius.Cristea [this message]
2026-07-22 17:12 ` Conor Dooley
2026-07-22 17:06 ` Marius.Cristea
2026-07-22 7:54 ` [PATCH v7 4/7] dt-bindings: iio: adc: microchip,mcp3911: Add spi-device-addr Janani Sunil
2026-07-22 16:41 ` Conor Dooley
2026-07-22 7:54 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] iio: adc: mcp3911: Add support for spi-device-addr Janani Sunil
2026-07-22 16:41 ` Conor Dooley
2026-07-22 16:43 ` Conor Dooley
2026-07-22 17:18 ` Marius.Cristea
2026-07-22 17:19 ` Marius.Cristea
2026-07-22 7:54 ` [PATCH v7 6/7] dt-bindings: iio: dac: Add AD5529R Janani Sunil
2026-07-22 16:39 ` Conor Dooley
2026-07-22 7:54 ` [PATCH v7 7/7] iio: dac: Add AD5529R DAC driver support Janani Sunil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3b5253f88b8363727dedee9481212e5be222bc9f.camel@microchip.com \
--to=marius.cristea@microchip.com \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jan.sun97@gmail.com \
--cc=janani.sunil@analog.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kent@minoris.se \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcus.folkesson@gmail.com \
--cc=nedo80@gmail.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox