From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, kprateek.nayak@amd.com,
iii@linux.ibm.com, corbet@lwn.net, tglx@kernel.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
seanjc@google.com, vschneid@redhat.com, huschle@linux.ibm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
maddy@linux.ibm.com, srikar@linux.ibm.com, hdanton@sina.com,
chleroy@kernel.org, vineeth@bitbyteword.org, frederic@kernel.org,
arighi@nvidia.com, pauld@redhat.com, christian.loehle@arm.com,
tj@kernel.org, tommaso.cucinotta@gmail.com, maz@kernel.org,
rafael@kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, kernellwp@gmail.com,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/23] cpumask: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2026 22:10:18 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6106cdbd-914d-4a12-b62e-4155aba16496@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <akUz3GlKrWQTZIWK@yury>
Hi Yury, Thanks for taking a look at the patches.
On 7/1/26 9:05 PM, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 07:46:34PM +0530, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
>> Provide cpu_preferred_mask infrastructure. Define get/set macros
>> which could be used to get/set CPU state as preferred.
>>
>> Values are set/clear by the new driver called steal_monitor.
>> It periodically samples the steal time and decides preferred CPU state.
>>
>> A CPU is set to preferred when it becomes active. Later it may be
>> marked as non-preferred depending on steal time values with
>> steal_monitor being enabled.
>>
>> Always maintain design construct of preferred is subset of active.
>> i.e. preferred ⊆ active ⊆ online ⊆ present ⊆ possible
>>
>> With PREFERRED_CPU=n, set is nop and get returns active state.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> v5->v6:
>> - Make it nop for PREFERRED_CPU=n
>> - Make it EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
>>
>> include/linux/cpumask.h | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> kernel/cpu.c | 6 ++++++
>> kernel/sched/core.c | 5 +++++
>> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
>> index d3cda0544954..c97271c063ce 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
>> @@ -122,12 +122,20 @@ extern struct cpumask __cpu_enabled_mask;
>> extern struct cpumask __cpu_present_mask;
>> extern struct cpumask __cpu_active_mask;
>> extern struct cpumask __cpu_dying_mask;
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU
>> +extern struct cpumask __cpu_preferred_mask;
>> +#else
>> +#define __cpu_preferred_mask __cpu_active_mask
>> +#endif
>> +
>> #define cpu_possible_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_possible_mask)
>> #define cpu_online_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_online_mask)
>> #define cpu_enabled_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_enabled_mask)
>> #define cpu_present_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_present_mask)
>> #define cpu_active_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_active_mask)
>> #define cpu_dying_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_dying_mask)
>> +#define cpu_preferred_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_preferred_mask)
>>
>> extern atomic_t __num_online_cpus;
>> extern unsigned int __num_possible_cpus;
>> @@ -1164,6 +1172,13 @@ void init_cpu_possible(const struct cpumask *src);
>> #define set_cpu_active(cpu, active) assign_cpu((cpu), &__cpu_active_mask, (active))
>> #define set_cpu_dying(cpu, dying) assign_cpu((cpu), &__cpu_dying_mask, (dying))
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU
>> +#define set_cpu_preferred(cpu, preferred) assign_cpu((cpu), &__cpu_preferred_mask, (preferred))
>> +#else
>> +/* Don't edit active state when the feature is off */
>
> And that makes a random reader thinking like why in the world he mentions
> active state here?
>
> Can you move this in commit message, or drop entirely?
Ok. I will drop it.
>
>> +#define set_cpu_preferred(cpu, preferred) {}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> void set_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu, bool online);
>> void set_cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu, bool possible);
>>
>> @@ -1258,7 +1273,12 @@ static __always_inline bool cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu)
>> return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_dying_mask);
>> }
>>
>> -#else
>> +static __always_inline bool cpu_preferred(unsigned int cpu)
>> +{
>> + return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_preferred_mask);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#else /* NR_CPUS <= 1 */
>
> NR_CPUS can't be less than 1, I guess.
Ah yes. It can't be 0 :-)
this can only be /* NR_CPUS == 1 */.
Since that is self explanatory, I guess it is good to drop that
comment addition. I think i did it to abide by that #else comment style
which i saw elsewhere.
>
>>
>> #define num_online_cpus() 1U
>> #define num_possible_cpus() 1U
>> @@ -1296,6 +1316,11 @@ static __always_inline bool cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu)
>> return false;
>> }
>>
>> +static __always_inline bool cpu_preferred(unsigned int cpu)
>> +{
>> + return cpu == 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> #endif /* NR_CPUS > 1 */
>>
>> #define cpu_is_offline(cpu) unlikely(!cpu_online(cpu))
>> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
>> index b3c8553d7bd6..376d297a6292 100644
>> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
>> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
>> @@ -3103,6 +3103,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_dying_mask);
>> atomic_t __num_online_cpus __read_mostly;
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__num_online_cpus);
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU
>> +struct cpumask __cpu_preferred_mask __read_mostly;
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__cpu_preferred_mask);
>> +#endif
>> +
>> void init_cpu_present(const struct cpumask *src)
>> {
>> cpumask_copy(&__cpu_present_mask, src);
>> @@ -3160,6 +3165,7 @@ void __init boot_cpu_init(void)
>> /* Mark the boot cpu "present", "online" etc for SMP and UP case */
>> set_cpu_online(cpu, true);
>> set_cpu_active(cpu, true);
>> + set_cpu_preferred(cpu, true);
>> set_cpu_present(cpu, true);
>> set_cpu_possible(cpu, true);
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> index 2e7cde033a31..a45f7c308329 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> @@ -8690,6 +8690,9 @@ int sched_cpu_activate(unsigned int cpu)
>> */
>> sched_set_rq_online(rq, cpu);
>>
>> + /* preferred is subset of active and follows its state */
>> + set_cpu_preferred(cpu, true);
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -8703,6 +8706,8 @@ int sched_cpu_deactivate(unsigned int cpu)
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> + set_cpu_preferred(cpu, false);
>> +
>> /*
>> * Remove CPU from nohz.idle_cpus_mask to prevent participating in
>> * load balancing when not active
>> --
>> 2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-01 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 14:16 [PATCH v6 00/23] sched: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask and steal-driven vCPU backoff Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 01/23] sched/docs: Document cpu_preferred_mask and Preferred CPU concept Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 02/23] kconfig: Provide PREFERRED_CPU option Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 03/23] cpumask: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 15:35 ` Yury Norov
2026-07-01 16:40 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 04/23] sysfs: Add preferred CPU file Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 05/23] sched/core: Try to use a preferred CPU in is_cpu_allowed Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 16:09 ` Yury Norov
2026-07-01 16:49 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 06/23] sched/fair: Load balance only among preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 16:19 ` Yury Norov
2026-07-01 16:41 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 07/23] sched/fair: Pull the load on preferred CPU Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 08/23] sched/core: Keep tick on non-preferred CPUs until tasks are out Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 09/23] sched/core: Push current task from non preferred CPU Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 16:50 ` Yury Norov
2026-07-01 17:03 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 10/23] sched/debug: Add migration stats due to non preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 11/23] virt/steal_monitor: Add documentation Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 12/23] virt: Introduce steal monitor driver Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 13/23] virt/steal_monitor: Restore to active on module disable Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 14/23] virt/steal_monitor: Define steal_monitor structure Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 15/23] virt/steal_monitor: Add control knobs for handling steal values Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 16/23] virt/steal_monitor: Compute work at regular intervals Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 17/23] virt/steal_monitor: Provide default method to get systemwide steal time Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 18/23] virt/steal_monitor: Provide default method to inc/dec preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 19/23] virt/steal_monitor: Provide default method to get num of CPUs for steal ratio Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 20/23] virt/steal_monitor: Act on steal values at regular intervals Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 21/23] virt/steal_monitor: Add direction control Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 22/23] virt/steal_monitor: Add design check of preferred subset of active Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 23/23] virt/steal_monitor: Optimise decrease_preferred_cpus when all CPUs are housekeeping Shrikanth Hegde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6106cdbd-914d-4a12-b62e-4155aba16496@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=huschle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tommaso.cucinotta@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox