Linux Documentation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, kprateek.nayak@amd.com,
	iii@linux.ibm.com, corbet@lwn.net, tglx@kernel.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	seanjc@google.com, vschneid@redhat.com, huschle@linux.ibm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	maddy@linux.ibm.com, srikar@linux.ibm.com, hdanton@sina.com,
	chleroy@kernel.org, vineeth@bitbyteword.org, frederic@kernel.org,
	arighi@nvidia.com, pauld@redhat.com, christian.loehle@arm.com,
	tj@kernel.org, tommaso.cucinotta@gmail.com, maz@kernel.org,
	rafael@kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, kernellwp@gmail.com,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/23] cpumask: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2026 22:10:18 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6106cdbd-914d-4a12-b62e-4155aba16496@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <akUz3GlKrWQTZIWK@yury>

Hi Yury, Thanks for taking a look at the patches.

On 7/1/26 9:05 PM, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 07:46:34PM +0530, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
>> Provide cpu_preferred_mask infrastructure. Define get/set macros
>> which could be used to get/set CPU state as preferred.
>>
>> Values are set/clear by the new driver called steal_monitor.
>> It periodically samples the steal time and decides preferred CPU state.
>>
>> A CPU is set to preferred when it becomes active. Later it may be
>> marked as non-preferred depending on steal time values with
>> steal_monitor being enabled.
>>
>> Always maintain design construct of preferred is subset of active.
>> i.e. preferred ⊆ active ⊆ online ⊆ present ⊆ possible
>>
>> With PREFERRED_CPU=n, set is nop and get returns active state.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> v5->v6:
>> - Make it nop for PREFERRED_CPU=n
>> - Make it EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
>>
>>   include/linux/cpumask.h | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   kernel/cpu.c            |  6 ++++++
>>   kernel/sched/core.c     |  5 +++++
>>   3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
>> index d3cda0544954..c97271c063ce 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
>> @@ -122,12 +122,20 @@ extern struct cpumask __cpu_enabled_mask;
>>   extern struct cpumask __cpu_present_mask;
>>   extern struct cpumask __cpu_active_mask;
>>   extern struct cpumask __cpu_dying_mask;
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU
>> +extern struct cpumask __cpu_preferred_mask;
>> +#else
>> +#define __cpu_preferred_mask __cpu_active_mask
>> +#endif
>> +
>>   #define cpu_possible_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_possible_mask)
>>   #define cpu_online_mask   ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_online_mask)
>>   #define cpu_enabled_mask   ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_enabled_mask)
>>   #define cpu_present_mask  ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_present_mask)
>>   #define cpu_active_mask   ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_active_mask)
>>   #define cpu_dying_mask    ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_dying_mask)
>> +#define cpu_preferred_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_preferred_mask)
>>   
>>   extern atomic_t __num_online_cpus;
>>   extern unsigned int __num_possible_cpus;
>> @@ -1164,6 +1172,13 @@ void init_cpu_possible(const struct cpumask *src);
>>   #define set_cpu_active(cpu, active)	assign_cpu((cpu), &__cpu_active_mask, (active))
>>   #define set_cpu_dying(cpu, dying)	assign_cpu((cpu), &__cpu_dying_mask, (dying))
>>   
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU
>> +#define set_cpu_preferred(cpu, preferred) assign_cpu((cpu), &__cpu_preferred_mask, (preferred))
>> +#else
>> +/* Don't edit active state when the feature is off */
> 
> And that makes a random reader thinking like why in the world he mentions
> active state here?
> 
> Can you move this in commit message, or drop entirely?

Ok. I will drop it.

> 
>> +#define set_cpu_preferred(cpu, preferred) {}
>> +#endif
>> +
>>   void set_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu, bool online);
>>   void set_cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu, bool possible);
>>   
>> @@ -1258,7 +1273,12 @@ static __always_inline bool cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu)
>>   	return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_dying_mask);
>>   }
>>   
>> -#else
>> +static __always_inline bool cpu_preferred(unsigned int cpu)
>> +{
>> +	return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_preferred_mask);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#else	/* NR_CPUS <= 1 */
> 
> NR_CPUS can't be less than 1, I guess.

Ah yes. It can't be 0 :-)
this can only be  /* NR_CPUS == 1 */.

Since that is self explanatory, I guess it is good to drop that
comment addition. I think i did it to abide by that #else comment style
which i saw elsewhere.

> 
>>   
>>   #define num_online_cpus()	1U
>>   #define num_possible_cpus()	1U
>> @@ -1296,6 +1316,11 @@ static __always_inline bool cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu)
>>   	return false;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static __always_inline bool cpu_preferred(unsigned int cpu)
>> +{
>> +	return cpu == 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>   #endif /* NR_CPUS > 1 */
>>   
>>   #define cpu_is_offline(cpu)	unlikely(!cpu_online(cpu))
>> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
>> index b3c8553d7bd6..376d297a6292 100644
>> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
>> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
>> @@ -3103,6 +3103,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_dying_mask);
>>   atomic_t __num_online_cpus __read_mostly;
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(__num_online_cpus);
>>   
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU
>> +struct cpumask __cpu_preferred_mask __read_mostly;
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__cpu_preferred_mask);
>> +#endif
>> +
>>   void init_cpu_present(const struct cpumask *src)
>>   {
>>   	cpumask_copy(&__cpu_present_mask, src);
>> @@ -3160,6 +3165,7 @@ void __init boot_cpu_init(void)
>>   	/* Mark the boot cpu "present", "online" etc for SMP and UP case */
>>   	set_cpu_online(cpu, true);
>>   	set_cpu_active(cpu, true);
>> +	set_cpu_preferred(cpu, true);
>>   	set_cpu_present(cpu, true);
>>   	set_cpu_possible(cpu, true);
>>   
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> index 2e7cde033a31..a45f7c308329 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> @@ -8690,6 +8690,9 @@ int sched_cpu_activate(unsigned int cpu)
>>   	 */
>>   	sched_set_rq_online(rq, cpu);
>>   
>> +	/* preferred is subset of active and follows its state */
>> +	set_cpu_preferred(cpu, true);
>> +
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> @@ -8703,6 +8706,8 @@ int sched_cpu_deactivate(unsigned int cpu)
>>   	if (ret)
>>   		return ret;
>>   
>> +	set_cpu_preferred(cpu, false);
>> +
>>   	/*
>>   	 * Remove CPU from nohz.idle_cpus_mask to prevent participating in
>>   	 * load balancing when not active
>> -- 
>> 2.47.3


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-01 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-01 14:16 [PATCH v6 00/23] sched: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask and steal-driven vCPU backoff Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 01/23] sched/docs: Document cpu_preferred_mask and Preferred CPU concept Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 02/23] kconfig: Provide PREFERRED_CPU option Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 03/23] cpumask: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 15:35   ` Yury Norov
2026-07-01 16:40     ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 04/23] sysfs: Add preferred CPU file Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 05/23] sched/core: Try to use a preferred CPU in is_cpu_allowed Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 16:09   ` Yury Norov
2026-07-01 16:49     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 06/23] sched/fair: Load balance only among preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 16:19   ` Yury Norov
2026-07-01 16:41     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 07/23] sched/fair: Pull the load on preferred CPU Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 08/23] sched/core: Keep tick on non-preferred CPUs until tasks are out Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 09/23] sched/core: Push current task from non preferred CPU Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 16:50   ` Yury Norov
2026-07-01 17:03     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 10/23] sched/debug: Add migration stats due to non preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 11/23] virt/steal_monitor: Add documentation Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 12/23] virt: Introduce steal monitor driver Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 13/23] virt/steal_monitor: Restore to active on module disable Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 14/23] virt/steal_monitor: Define steal_monitor structure Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 15/23] virt/steal_monitor: Add control knobs for handling steal values Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 16/23] virt/steal_monitor: Compute work at regular intervals Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 17/23] virt/steal_monitor: Provide default method to get systemwide steal time Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 18/23] virt/steal_monitor: Provide default method to inc/dec preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 19/23] virt/steal_monitor: Provide default method to get num of CPUs for steal ratio Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 20/23] virt/steal_monitor: Act on steal values at regular intervals Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 21/23] virt/steal_monitor: Add direction control Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 22/23] virt/steal_monitor: Add design check of preferred subset of active Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-01 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 23/23] virt/steal_monitor: Optimise decrease_preferred_cpus when all CPUs are housekeeping Shrikanth Hegde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6106cdbd-914d-4a12-b62e-4155aba16496@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=huschle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=tommaso.cucinotta@gmail.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox