Re: [PATCH 1/2] Doc: deprecated.rst: add strlcat()

[Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>]

On Sun, 10 May 2026, Manuel Ebner <manuelebner@mailbox.org> wrote:
> add strlcat and alternatives

You'd think it's the strlcat() definition that needs a comment above it
saying it's deprecated. I don't think folks really look at
deprecated.rst.

BR,
Jani.

>
> Signed-off-by: Manuel Ebner <manuelebner@mailbox.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/process/deprecated.rst | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst b/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst
> index fed56864d036..b8a65c19796c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst
> @@ -162,6 +162,12 @@ if a source string is not NUL-terminated. The safe replacement is strscpy(),
>  though care must be given to any cases where the return value of strlcpy()
>  is used, since strscpy() will return negative errno values when it truncates.
>  
> +strlcat()
> +---------
> +strlcat() must re-scan the destination string from the beginning on each
> +call (O(n^2) behavior). Alternatives are seq_buf_puts(), seq_buf_printf(),
> +snprintf() and scnprintf()
> +
>  %p format specifier
>  -------------------
>  Traditionally, using "%p" in format strings would lead to regular address

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel