[bpf:master 6/15] htmldocs: Warning: Documentation/bpf/btf.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc

[bpf:master 6/15] htmldocs: Warning: Documentation/bpf/btf.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc

[kernel test robot]

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git master
head:   be8e754cbfac698d6304bb8382c8d18ac74424d3
commit: be4033d36070e44fba766a21ef2d0c24fa04c377 [6/15] docs/bpf: Add description for CO-RE relocations
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> Warning: Documentation/bpf/btf.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc
>> Warning: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/btf

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

Re: [bpf:master 6/15] htmldocs: Warning: Documentation/bpf/btf.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc

[Daniel Borkmann]

Hi Eduard,

On 9/1/23 2:05 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git master
> head:   be8e754cbfac698d6304bb8382c8d18ac74424d3
> commit: be4033d36070e44fba766a21ef2d0c24fa04c377 [6/15] docs/bpf: Add description for CO-RE relocations
> reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/
> 
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>>> Warning: Documentation/bpf/btf.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc
>>> Warning: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/btf

Could you send a follow-up fix for bpf tree?

Thanks,
Daniel

Re: [bpf:master 6/15] htmldocs: Warning: Documentation/bpf/btf.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc

[Eduard Zingerman]

On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 08:29 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Hi Eduard,
> 
> On 9/1/23 2:05 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git master
> > head:   be8e754cbfac698d6304bb8382c8d18ac74424d3
> > commit: be4033d36070e44fba766a21ef2d0c24fa04c377 [6/15] docs/bpf: Add description for CO-RE relocations
> > reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> > 
> > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/
> > 
> > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > 
> > > > Warning: Documentation/bpf/btf.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc
> > > > Warning: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/btf
> 
> Could you send a follow-up fix for bpf tree?

Hi Daniel,

Will send the fix shortly. Strangely, I did check this syntax locally
before sending the original patch, and had no warnings reported.

Thanks,
Eduard

Re: [bpf:master 6/15] htmldocs: Warning: Documentation/bpf/btf.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc

[Eduard Zingerman]

On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 12:26 +0300, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 08:29 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > Hi Eduard,
> > 
> > On 9/1/23 2:05 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git master
> > > head:   be8e754cbfac698d6304bb8382c8d18ac74424d3
> > > commit: be4033d36070e44fba766a21ef2d0c24fa04c377 [6/15] docs/bpf: Add description for CO-RE relocations
> > > reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> > > 
> > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> > > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/
> > > 
> > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > > 
> > > > > Warning: Documentation/bpf/btf.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc
> > > > > Warning: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/btf
> > 
> > Could you send a follow-up fix for bpf tree?
> 
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> Will send the fix shortly. Strangely, I did check this syntax locally
> before sending the original patch, and had no warnings reported.

I followed reproducing instructions but can't trigger this warning,
tried several sphinx versions:
- 1.7.9
- 2.4.4
- 4.3.2

I'll remove 'Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc' and 'Documentation/bpf/btf'
labels from the documents (and these are link labels, not actual
links), but it looks like I don't have a way to check the results in a
way compatible with test robot.

Re: [bpf:master 6/15] htmldocs: Warning: Documentation/bpf/btf.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc

[Daniel Borkmann]

On 9/1/23 1:18 PM, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 12:26 +0300, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
>> On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 08:29 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>> Hi Eduard,
>>>
>>> On 9/1/23 2:05 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
>>>> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git master
>>>> head:   be8e754cbfac698d6304bb8382c8d18ac74424d3
>>>> commit: be4033d36070e44fba766a21ef2d0c24fa04c377 [6/15] docs/bpf: Add description for CO-RE relocations
>>>> reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>>>>
>>>> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
>>>> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
>>>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/
>>>>
>>>> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>>>
>>>>>> Warning: Documentation/bpf/btf.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc
>>>>>> Warning: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/btf
>>>
>>> Could you send a follow-up fix for bpf tree?
>>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> Will send the fix shortly. Strangely, I did check this syntax locally
>> before sending the original patch, and had no warnings reported.
> 
> I followed reproducing instructions but can't trigger this warning,
> tried several sphinx versions:
> - 1.7.9
> - 2.4.4
> - 4.3.2
> 
> I'll remove 'Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc' and 'Documentation/bpf/btf'
> labels from the documents (and these are link labels, not actual
> links), but it looks like I don't have a way to check the results in a
> way compatible with test robot.

Strange, perhaps LKP folks could chime in and provide some more guidance e.g.
wrt Sphinx version.

Thanks,
Daniel

Re: [bpf:master 6/15] htmldocs: Warning: Documentation/bpf/btf.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc

[Eduard Zingerman]

On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 13:22 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 9/1/23 1:18 PM, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> > On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 12:26 +0300, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 08:29 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > > > Hi Eduard,
> > > > 
> > > > On 9/1/23 2:05 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > > > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git master
> > > > > head:   be8e754cbfac698d6304bb8382c8d18ac74424d3
> > > > > commit: be4033d36070e44fba766a21ef2d0c24fa04c377 [6/15] docs/bpf: Add description for CO-RE relocations
> > > > > reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> > > > > 
> > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> > > > > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > > > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > > > > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/
> > > > > 
> > > > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > > > > 
> > > > > > > Warning: Documentation/bpf/btf.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc
> > > > > > > Warning: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/btf
> > > > 
> > > > Could you send a follow-up fix for bpf tree?
> > > 
> > > Hi Daniel,
> > > 
> > > Will send the fix shortly. Strangely, I did check this syntax locally
> > > before sending the original patch, and had no warnings reported.
> > 
> > I followed reproducing instructions but can't trigger this warning,
> > tried several sphinx versions:
> > - 1.7.9
> > - 2.4.4
> > - 4.3.2
> > 
> > I'll remove 'Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc' and 'Documentation/bpf/btf'
> > labels from the documents (and these are link labels, not actual
> > links), but it looks like I don't have a way to check the results in a
> > way compatible with test robot.
> 
> Strange, perhaps LKP folks could chime in and provide some more guidance e.g.
> wrt Sphinx version.

...sigh... I rebuilt the kernel and all of a sudden warnings are shown.
Sorry of all the noise, will send the fix soon.

Re: [bpf:master 6/15] htmldocs: Warning: Documentation/bpf/btf.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc

[Philip Li]

On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:48:26PM +0300, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 13:22 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > On 9/1/23 1:18 PM, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 12:26 +0300, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 08:29 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > > > > Hi Eduard,
> > > > > 
> > > > > On 9/1/23 2:05 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > > > > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git master
> > > > > > head:   be8e754cbfac698d6304bb8382c8d18ac74424d3
> > > > > > commit: be4033d36070e44fba766a21ef2d0c24fa04c377 [6/15] docs/bpf: Add description for CO-RE relocations
> > > > > > reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> > > > > > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > > > > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > > > > > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Warning: Documentation/bpf/btf.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc
> > > > > > > > Warning: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/btf
> > > > > 
> > > > > Could you send a follow-up fix for bpf tree?
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Daniel,
> > > > 
> > > > Will send the fix shortly. Strangely, I did check this syntax locally
> > > > before sending the original patch, and had no warnings reported.
> > > 
> > > I followed reproducing instructions but can't trigger this warning,
> > > tried several sphinx versions:
> > > - 1.7.9
> > > - 2.4.4
> > > - 4.3.2
> > > 
> > > I'll remove 'Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc' and 'Documentation/bpf/btf'
> > > labels from the documents (and these are link labels, not actual
> > > links), but it looks like I don't have a way to check the results in a
> > > way compatible with test robot.
> > 
> > Strange, perhaps LKP folks could chime in and provide some more guidance e.g.
> > wrt Sphinx version.

sorry for late info, this one is using 2.4.4 sphinx, the full make command is
like

	make W=1 --keep-going HOSTCC=gcc-12 CC=gcc-12 -j32 ARCH=x86_64 SPHINXOPTS=-j1 htmldocs	

> 
> ...sigh... I rebuilt the kernel and all of a sudden warnings are shown.
> Sorry of all the noise, will send the fix soon.
> 
> 

Re: [bpf:master 6/15] htmldocs: Warning: Documentation/bpf/btf.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc

[Eduard Zingerman]

On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 20:23 +0800, Philip Li wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:48:26PM +0300, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> > On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 13:22 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > > On 9/1/23 1:18 PM, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 12:26 +0300, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 08:29 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Eduard,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On 9/1/23 2:05 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > > > > > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git master
> > > > > > > head:   be8e754cbfac698d6304bb8382c8d18ac74424d3
> > > > > > > commit: be4033d36070e44fba766a21ef2d0c24fa04c377 [6/15] docs/bpf: Add description for CO-RE relocations
> > > > > > > reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> > > > > > > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > > > > > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > > > > > > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Warning: Documentation/bpf/btf.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc
> > > > > > > > > Warning: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/btf
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Could you send a follow-up fix for bpf tree?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hi Daniel,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Will send the fix shortly. Strangely, I did check this syntax locally
> > > > > before sending the original patch, and had no warnings reported.
> > > > 
> > > > I followed reproducing instructions but can't trigger this warning,
> > > > tried several sphinx versions:
> > > > - 1.7.9
> > > > - 2.4.4
> > > > - 4.3.2
> > > > 
> > > > I'll remove 'Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc' and 'Documentation/bpf/btf'
> > > > labels from the documents (and these are link labels, not actual
> > > > links), but it looks like I don't have a way to check the results in a
> > > > way compatible with test robot.
> > > 
> > > Strange, perhaps LKP folks could chime in and provide some more guidance e.g.
> > > wrt Sphinx version.
> 
> sorry for late info, this one is using 2.4.4 sphinx, the full make command is
> like
> 
> 	make W=1 --keep-going HOSTCC=gcc-12 CC=gcc-12 -j32 ARCH=x86_64 SPHINXOPTS=-j1 htmldocs	

Hi Philip,

Thanks for info, I'll keep 2.4.4 locally to be in sync with test robot.
For some reason script/documentation-file-ref-check (which reports
this warning) did run for me until after I compiled the kernel.
Probably some issue on my side.

Thanks,
Eduard

> 
> > 
> > ...sigh... I rebuilt the kernel and all of a sudden warnings are shown.
> > Sorry of all the noise, will send the fix soon.
> > 
> > 

Re: [bpf:master 6/15] htmldocs: Warning: Documentation/bpf/btf.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc

[Philip Li]

On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 03:27:19PM +0300, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 20:23 +0800, Philip Li wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:48:26PM +0300, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 13:22 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > > > On 9/1/23 1:18 PM, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 12:26 +0300, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 08:29 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi Eduard,
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On 9/1/23 2:05 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > > > > > > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git master
> > > > > > > > head:   be8e754cbfac698d6304bb8382c8d18ac74424d3
> > > > > > > > commit: be4033d36070e44fba766a21ef2d0c24fa04c377 [6/15] docs/bpf: Add description for CO-RE relocations
> > > > > > > > reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> > > > > > > > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > > > > > > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > > > > > > > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Warning: Documentation/bpf/btf.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc
> > > > > > > > > > Warning: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/btf
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Could you send a follow-up fix for bpf tree?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Hi Daniel,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Will send the fix shortly. Strangely, I did check this syntax locally
> > > > > > before sending the original patch, and had no warnings reported.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I followed reproducing instructions but can't trigger this warning,
> > > > > tried several sphinx versions:
> > > > > - 1.7.9
> > > > > - 2.4.4
> > > > > - 4.3.2
> > > > > 
> > > > > I'll remove 'Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc' and 'Documentation/bpf/btf'
> > > > > labels from the documents (and these are link labels, not actual
> > > > > links), but it looks like I don't have a way to check the results in a
> > > > > way compatible with test robot.
> > > > 
> > > > Strange, perhaps LKP folks could chime in and provide some more guidance e.g.
> > > > wrt Sphinx version.
> > 
> > sorry for late info, this one is using 2.4.4 sphinx, the full make command is
> > like
> > 
> > 	make W=1 --keep-going HOSTCC=gcc-12 CC=gcc-12 -j32 ARCH=x86_64 SPHINXOPTS=-j1 htmldocs	
> 
> Hi Philip,
> 
> Thanks for info, I'll keep 2.4.4 locally to be in sync with test robot.

You are welcome. For the robot side, we actually read the version from
Documentation/sphinx/requirements.txt of the test commit.

For this series, it is 2.4.4. And we also support other versions like
1.4.9, 1.7.9.

> For some reason script/documentation-file-ref-check (which reports
> this warning) did run for me until after I compiled the kernel.
> Probably some issue on my side.

Got it, thanks for the confirmation.

> 
> Thanks,
> Eduard
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > ...sigh... I rebuilt the kernel and all of a sudden warnings are shown.
> > > Sorry of all the noise, will send the fix soon.
> > > 
> > > 
> 

Re: [bpf:master 6/15] htmldocs: Warning: Documentation/bpf/btf.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc

[Daniel Borkmann]

On 9/1/23 2:33 PM, Philip Li wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 03:27:19PM +0300, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
>> On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 20:23 +0800, Philip Li wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:48:26PM +0300, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 13:22 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>>>> On 9/1/23 1:18 PM, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 12:26 +0300, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 08:29 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Eduard,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 9/1/23 2:05 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
>>>>>>>>> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git master
>>>>>>>>> head:   be8e754cbfac698d6304bb8382c8d18ac74424d3
>>>>>>>>> commit: be4033d36070e44fba766a21ef2d0c24fa04c377 [6/15] docs/bpf: Add description for CO-RE relocations
>>>>>>>>> reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
>>>>>>>>> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
>>>>>>>>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Warning: Documentation/bpf/btf.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc
>>>>>>>>>>> Warning: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/btf
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Could you send a follow-up fix for bpf tree?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Will send the fix shortly. Strangely, I did check this syntax locally
>>>>>>> before sending the original patch, and had no warnings reported.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I followed reproducing instructions but can't trigger this warning,
>>>>>> tried several sphinx versions:
>>>>>> - 1.7.9
>>>>>> - 2.4.4
>>>>>> - 4.3.2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll remove 'Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc' and 'Documentation/bpf/btf'
>>>>>> labels from the documents (and these are link labels, not actual
>>>>>> links), but it looks like I don't have a way to check the results in a
>>>>>> way compatible with test robot.
>>>>>
>>>>> Strange, perhaps LKP folks could chime in and provide some more guidance e.g.
>>>>> wrt Sphinx version.
>>>
>>> sorry for late info, this one is using 2.4.4 sphinx, the full make command is
>>> like
>>>
>>> 	make W=1 --keep-going HOSTCC=gcc-12 CC=gcc-12 -j32 ARCH=x86_64 SPHINXOPTS=-j1 htmldocs	
>>
>> Hi Philip,
>>
>> Thanks for info, I'll keep 2.4.4 locally to be in sync with test robot.
> 
> You are welcome. For the robot side, we actually read the version from
> Documentation/sphinx/requirements.txt of the test commit.
> 
> For this series, it is 2.4.4. And we also support other versions like
> 1.4.9, 1.7.9.

Side-note: @Philip, if it's not too much effort, would it be possible to add
version info into the reproduce file as a # comment in future?

https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/reproduce

Anyway, thanks everyone!

Re: [bpf:master 6/15] htmldocs: Warning: Documentation/bpf/btf.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc

[Philip Li]

On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:49:32PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 9/1/23 2:33 PM, Philip Li wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 03:27:19PM +0300, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 20:23 +0800, Philip Li wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:48:26PM +0300, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 13:22 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > > > > > On 9/1/23 1:18 PM, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> > > > > > > On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 12:26 +0300, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 08:29 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Hi Eduard,
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > On 9/1/23 2:05 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git master
> > > > > > > > > > head:   be8e754cbfac698d6304bb8382c8d18ac74424d3
> > > > > > > > > > commit: be4033d36070e44fba766a21ef2d0c24fa04c377 [6/15] docs/bpf: Add description for CO-RE relocations
> > > > > > > > > > reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> > > > > > > > > > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > > > > > > > > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > Warning: Documentation/bpf/btf.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc
> > > > > > > > > > > > Warning: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/btf
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Could you send a follow-up fix for bpf tree?
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Hi Daniel,
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Will send the fix shortly. Strangely, I did check this syntax locally
> > > > > > > > before sending the original patch, and had no warnings reported.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I followed reproducing instructions but can't trigger this warning,
> > > > > > > tried several sphinx versions:
> > > > > > > - 1.7.9
> > > > > > > - 2.4.4
> > > > > > > - 4.3.2
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I'll remove 'Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc' and 'Documentation/bpf/btf'
> > > > > > > labels from the documents (and these are link labels, not actual
> > > > > > > links), but it looks like I don't have a way to check the results in a
> > > > > > > way compatible with test robot.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Strange, perhaps LKP folks could chime in and provide some more guidance e.g.
> > > > > > wrt Sphinx version.
> > > > 
> > > > sorry for late info, this one is using 2.4.4 sphinx, the full make command is
> > > > like
> > > > 
> > > > 	make W=1 --keep-going HOSTCC=gcc-12 CC=gcc-12 -j32 ARCH=x86_64 SPHINXOPTS=-j1 htmldocs	
> > > 
> > > Hi Philip,
> > > 
> > > Thanks for info, I'll keep 2.4.4 locally to be in sync with test robot.
> > 
> > You are welcome. For the robot side, we actually read the version from
> > Documentation/sphinx/requirements.txt of the test commit.
> > 
> > For this series, it is 2.4.4. And we also support other versions like
> > 1.4.9, 1.7.9.
> 
> Side-note: @Philip, if it's not too much effort, would it be possible to add
> version info into the reproduce file as a # comment in future?

Sure, we will implement this early next week.

> 
> https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/reproduce
> 
> Anyway, thanks everyone!

Re: [bpf:master 6/15] htmldocs: Warning: Documentation/bpf/btf.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc

[Philip Li]

On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 08:57:26PM +0800, Philip Li wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:49:32PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > On 9/1/23 2:33 PM, Philip Li wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 03:27:19PM +0300, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 20:23 +0800, Philip Li wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:48:26PM +0300, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 13:22 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > > > > > > On 9/1/23 1:18 PM, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 12:26 +0300, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 08:29 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Hi Eduard,
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > On 9/1/23 2:05 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git master
> > > > > > > > > > > head:   be8e754cbfac698d6304bb8382c8d18ac74424d3
> > > > > > > > > > > commit: be4033d36070e44fba766a21ef2d0c24fa04c377 [6/15] docs/bpf: Add description for CO-RE relocations
> > > > > > > > > > > reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> > > > > > > > > > > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > > > > > > > > > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Warning: Documentation/bpf/btf.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Warning: Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc.rst references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/bpf/btf
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Could you send a follow-up fix for bpf tree?
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Hi Daniel,
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Will send the fix shortly. Strangely, I did check this syntax locally
> > > > > > > > > before sending the original patch, and had no warnings reported.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > I followed reproducing instructions but can't trigger this warning,
> > > > > > > > tried several sphinx versions:
> > > > > > > > - 1.7.9
> > > > > > > > - 2.4.4
> > > > > > > > - 4.3.2
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > I'll remove 'Documentation/bpf/llvm_reloc' and 'Documentation/bpf/btf'
> > > > > > > > labels from the documents (and these are link labels, not actual
> > > > > > > > links), but it looks like I don't have a way to check the results in a
> > > > > > > > way compatible with test robot.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Strange, perhaps LKP folks could chime in and provide some more guidance e.g.
> > > > > > > wrt Sphinx version.
> > > > > 
> > > > > sorry for late info, this one is using 2.4.4 sphinx, the full make command is
> > > > > like
> > > > > 
> > > > > 	make W=1 --keep-going HOSTCC=gcc-12 CC=gcc-12 -j32 ARCH=x86_64 SPHINXOPTS=-j1 htmldocs	
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Philip,
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks for info, I'll keep 2.4.4 locally to be in sync with test robot.
> > > 
> > > You are welcome. For the robot side, we actually read the version from
> > > Documentation/sphinx/requirements.txt of the test commit.
> > > 
> > > For this series, it is 2.4.4. And we also support other versions like
> > > 1.4.9, 1.7.9.
> > 
> > Side-note: @Philip, if it's not too much effort, would it be possible to add
> > version info into the reproduce file as a # comment in future?
> 
> Sure, we will implement this early next week.

Just FYI: the latest report with version info can be found at

https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230910/202309102306.O46hkAzJ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce

reproduce:
        git remote add hverkuil-media-tree git://linuxtv.org/hverkuil/media_tree.git
        git fetch --no-tags hverkuil-media-tree hdmi-dbg
        git checkout 1eb159538ab221d1ffb1002a0cf8585906e75ca0
        make menuconfig
        # enable CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST, CONFIG_WARN_MISSING_DOCUMENTS, CONFIG_WARN_ABI_ERRORS
        # install Sphinx 2.4.4
        make htmldocs

> 
> > 
> > https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309010804.G3MpXo59-lkp@intel.com/reproduce
> > 
> > Anyway, thanks everyone!