* [PATCH] ublk: refuse to go live after an io command was canceled
[not found] <20261001125422.1364260-1-tom.leiming@gmail.com>
@ 2026-10-05 16:23 ` Josef Bacik
2026-10-06 14:14 ` Ming Lei
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Josef Bacik @ 2026-10-05 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ming Lei, Jens Axboe
Cc: Caleb Sander Mateos, linux-block, linux-kernel, linux-doc
Since commit "ublk: keep a canceled FETCH round canceling until the
server is gone", a device whose FETCH round saw a cancel keeps its
queues canceling until the server goes away, but START_DEV and
END_USER_RECOVERY still bring it up. Without UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY, or
with UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY_FAIL_IO, every request of the new disk fails.
With UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY, requests are requeued and never kicked: after
START_DEV the partition scan hangs under disk->open_mutex, and after
END_USER_RECOVERY every read parks while the command returned 0. The
server cannot fetch the canceled commands again, so the device can't
serve I/O until it restarts anyway.
Return -ENODEV from START_DEV and END_USER_RECOVERY while ub->canceling
is set. In ublk_ctrl_start_dev() check it and publish ub->ub_disk in one
cancel_mutex section, and have ublk_start_cancel() read the disk in its
cancel_mutex section. Today ublk_start_cancel() samples the disk before
taking the mutex, so a server dying during its own START_DEV can mark
the queues without quiescing a disk START_DEV published in between, with
its first I/O past the canceling check. Now either START_DEV sees the
cancel, or the cancel sees the disk and quiesces it before marking. The
END_USER_RECOVERY check is best effort: the disk exists there, and a
cancel after it is the ordinary death of the new server, which
ublk_start_cancel() handles by quiescing and marking.
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
---
This applies on top of Ming's "[PATCH 0/8] ublk: don't dispatch to
canceled io commands" and needs patch 1 of it for ub->canceling to stay
set for the whole FETCH round. generic_18 still passes with it.
Documentation/block/ublk.rst | 10 ++++++++--
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/block/ublk.rst b/Documentation/block/ublk.rst
index 28300fee22bf..b7875a3cf3fc 100644
--- a/Documentation/block/ublk.rst
+++ b/Documentation/block/ublk.rst
@@ -118,7 +118,11 @@ managing and controlling ublk devices with help of several control commands:
After the server prepares userspace resources (such as creating I/O handler
threads & io_uring for handling ublk IO), this command is sent to the
driver for allocating & exposing ``/dev/ublkb*``. Parameters set via
- ``UBLK_CMD_SET_PARAMS`` are applied for creating the device.
+ ``UBLK_CMD_SET_PARAMS`` are applied for creating the device. The command
+ fails with ``-ENODEV`` if an I/O command fetched by the current server
+ was canceled, because its io_uring is gone. The server can't fetch it
+ again, and the device can be started again once the server has closed
+ ``/dev/ublkc*``.
- ``UBLK_CMD_STOP_DEV``
@@ -195,7 +199,9 @@ managing and controlling ublk devices with help of several control commands:
command is accepted after ublk device is quiesced and a new process has
opened ``/dev/ublkc*`` and get all ublk queues be ready. When this command
returns, ublk device is unquiesced and new I/O requests are passed to the
- new process.
+ new process. It fails with ``-ENODEV`` if an I/O command of the new
+ process was canceled already. The recovery can be started over once the
+ new process has closed ``/dev/ublkc*``.
- user recovery feature description
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index f57d544c1da2..39eb7775a351 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -2759,9 +2759,11 @@ static void ublk_abort_queue(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq)
static void ublk_start_cancel(struct ublk_device *ub)
{
- struct gendisk *disk = ublk_get_disk(ub);
+ struct gendisk *disk;
+ /* sync with ublk_ctrl_start_dev() publishing the disk */
mutex_lock(&ub->cancel_mutex);
+ disk = ublk_get_disk(ub);
if (ub->canceling)
goto out;
@@ -4575,6 +4577,7 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_start_dev(struct ublk_device *ub,
.dma_alignment = 3,
};
struct gendisk *disk;
+ bool canceled;
int ret = -EINVAL;
if (ublksrv_pid <= 0)
@@ -4665,8 +4668,24 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_start_dev(struct ublk_device *ub,
disk->fops = &ub_fops;
disk->private_data = ub;
+ /*
+ * A command of this FETCH round was canceled and can't be fetched
+ * again, don't bring up a disk over it. Check and publish the disk
+ * in one cancel_mutex section: either this sees ub->canceling, or
+ * ublk_start_cancel() sees the disk and quiesces it before marking
+ * the queues.
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&ub->cancel_mutex);
+ canceled = ub->canceling;
+ if (!canceled)
+ ub->ub_disk = disk;
+ mutex_unlock(&ub->cancel_mutex);
+ if (canceled) {
+ put_disk(disk);
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
ub->dev_info.ublksrv_pid = ub->ublksrv_tgid;
- ub->ub_disk = disk;
ublk_apply_params(ub);
@@ -5238,6 +5257,7 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_end_recovery(struct ublk_device *ub,
const struct ublksrv_ctrl_cmd *header)
{
int ublksrv_pid = (int)header->data[0];
+ bool canceled;
int ret = -EINVAL;
pr_devel("%s: Waiting for all FETCH_REQs, dev id %d...\n", __func__,
@@ -5261,6 +5281,20 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_end_recovery(struct ublk_device *ub,
ret = -EBUSY;
goto out_unlock;
}
+
+ /*
+ * As in ublk_ctrl_start_dev(), a canceled command can't be fetched
+ * again. Best effort: the disk exists here, and a cancel after this
+ * check is the ordinary death of the new server, which
+ * ublk_start_cancel() handles by quiescing and marking.
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&ub->cancel_mutex);
+ canceled = ub->canceling;
+ mutex_unlock(&ub->cancel_mutex);
+ if (canceled) {
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
ub->dev_info.ublksrv_pid = ub->ublksrv_tgid;
ub->dev_info.state = UBLK_S_DEV_LIVE;
pr_devel("%s: new ublksrv_pid %d, dev id %d\n",
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] ublk: refuse to go live after an io command was canceled
2026-10-06 14:14 ` Ming Lei
@ 2026-10-05 16:23 ` Josef Bacik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Josef Bacik @ 2026-10-05 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ming Lei, Jens Axboe
Cc: Caleb Sander Mateos, linux-block, linux-kernel, linux-doc
Since commit "ublk: keep a canceled FETCH round canceling until the
server is gone", a device whose FETCH round saw a cancel keeps its
queues canceling until the server goes away, but START_DEV and
END_USER_RECOVERY still bring it up. Without UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY, or
with UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY_FAIL_IO, every request of the new disk fails.
With UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY, requests are requeued and never kicked: after
START_DEV the partition scan hangs under disk->open_mutex, and after
END_USER_RECOVERY every read parks while the command returned 0. The
server cannot fetch the canceled commands again, so the device can't
serve I/O until it restarts anyway.
Return -EBUSY from START_DEV and END_USER_RECOVERY while ub->canceling
is set. In ublk_ctrl_start_dev() check it and publish ub->ub_disk in one
cancel_mutex section, and have ublk_start_cancel() read the disk in its
cancel_mutex section. Today ublk_start_cancel() samples the disk before
taking the mutex, so a server dying during its own START_DEV can mark
the queues without quiescing a disk START_DEV published in between, with
its first I/O past the canceling check. Now either START_DEV sees the
cancel, or the cancel sees the disk and quiesces it before marking. The
END_USER_RECOVERY check is best effort: the disk exists there, and a
cancel after it is the ordinary death of the new server, which
ublk_start_cancel() handles by quiescing and marking.
Assisted-by: LLM
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
---
v2: -EBUSY instead of -ENODEV, the device isn't gone (Ming)
This applies on top of Ming's "[PATCH 0/8] ublk: don't dispatch to
canceled io commands" and needs patch 1 of it for ub->canceling to stay
set for the whole FETCH round.
Documentation/block/ublk.rst | 10 ++++++++--
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/block/ublk.rst b/Documentation/block/ublk.rst
index 28300fee22bf..6c5536ebd987 100644
--- a/Documentation/block/ublk.rst
+++ b/Documentation/block/ublk.rst
@@ -118,7 +118,11 @@ managing and controlling ublk devices with help of several control commands:
After the server prepares userspace resources (such as creating I/O handler
threads & io_uring for handling ublk IO), this command is sent to the
driver for allocating & exposing ``/dev/ublkb*``. Parameters set via
- ``UBLK_CMD_SET_PARAMS`` are applied for creating the device.
+ ``UBLK_CMD_SET_PARAMS`` are applied for creating the device. The command
+ fails with ``-EBUSY`` if an I/O command fetched by the current server
+ was canceled, because its io_uring is gone. The server can't fetch it
+ again, and the device can be started again once the server has closed
+ ``/dev/ublkc*``.
- ``UBLK_CMD_STOP_DEV``
@@ -195,7 +199,9 @@ managing and controlling ublk devices with help of several control commands:
command is accepted after ublk device is quiesced and a new process has
opened ``/dev/ublkc*`` and get all ublk queues be ready. When this command
returns, ublk device is unquiesced and new I/O requests are passed to the
- new process.
+ new process. It fails with ``-EBUSY`` if an I/O command of the new
+ process was canceled already. The recovery can be started over once the
+ new process has closed ``/dev/ublkc*``.
- user recovery feature description
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index f57d544c1da2..015aff07703c 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -2759,9 +2759,11 @@ static void ublk_abort_queue(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq)
static void ublk_start_cancel(struct ublk_device *ub)
{
- struct gendisk *disk = ublk_get_disk(ub);
+ struct gendisk *disk;
+ /* sync with ublk_ctrl_start_dev() publishing the disk */
mutex_lock(&ub->cancel_mutex);
+ disk = ublk_get_disk(ub);
if (ub->canceling)
goto out;
@@ -4575,6 +4577,7 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_start_dev(struct ublk_device *ub,
.dma_alignment = 3,
};
struct gendisk *disk;
+ bool canceled;
int ret = -EINVAL;
if (ublksrv_pid <= 0)
@@ -4665,8 +4668,24 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_start_dev(struct ublk_device *ub,
disk->fops = &ub_fops;
disk->private_data = ub;
+ /*
+ * A command of this FETCH round was canceled and can't be fetched
+ * again, don't bring up a disk over it. Check and publish the disk
+ * in one cancel_mutex section: either this sees ub->canceling, or
+ * ublk_start_cancel() sees the disk and quiesces it before marking
+ * the queues.
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&ub->cancel_mutex);
+ canceled = ub->canceling;
+ if (!canceled)
+ ub->ub_disk = disk;
+ mutex_unlock(&ub->cancel_mutex);
+ if (canceled) {
+ put_disk(disk);
+ ret = -EBUSY;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
ub->dev_info.ublksrv_pid = ub->ublksrv_tgid;
- ub->ub_disk = disk;
ublk_apply_params(ub);
@@ -5238,6 +5257,7 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_end_recovery(struct ublk_device *ub,
const struct ublksrv_ctrl_cmd *header)
{
int ublksrv_pid = (int)header->data[0];
+ bool canceled;
int ret = -EINVAL;
pr_devel("%s: Waiting for all FETCH_REQs, dev id %d...\n", __func__,
@@ -5261,6 +5281,20 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_end_recovery(struct ublk_device *ub,
ret = -EBUSY;
goto out_unlock;
}
+
+ /*
+ * As in ublk_ctrl_start_dev(), a canceled command can't be fetched
+ * again. Best effort: the disk exists here, and a cancel after this
+ * check is the ordinary death of the new server, which
+ * ublk_start_cancel() handles by quiescing and marking.
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&ub->cancel_mutex);
+ canceled = ub->canceling;
+ mutex_unlock(&ub->cancel_mutex);
+ if (canceled) {
+ ret = -EBUSY;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
ub->dev_info.ublksrv_pid = ub->ublksrv_tgid;
ub->dev_info.state = UBLK_S_DEV_LIVE;
pr_devel("%s: new ublksrv_pid %d, dev id %d\n",
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ublk: refuse to go live after an io command was canceled
2026-10-05 16:23 ` [PATCH] ublk: refuse to go live after an io command was canceled Josef Bacik
@ 2026-10-06 14:14 ` Ming Lei
2026-10-05 16:23 ` [PATCH v2] " Josef Bacik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2026-10-06 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Josef Bacik
Cc: Jens Axboe, Caleb Sander Mateos, linux-block, linux-kernel,
linux-doc
On Mon, Oct 05, 2026 at 04:23:51PM +0000, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Since commit "ublk: keep a canceled FETCH round canceling until the
> server is gone", a device whose FETCH round saw a cancel keeps its
> queues canceling until the server goes away, but START_DEV and
> END_USER_RECOVERY still bring it up. Without UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY, or
> with UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY_FAIL_IO, every request of the new disk fails.
> With UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY, requests are requeued and never kicked: after
> START_DEV the partition scan hangs under disk->open_mutex, and after
> END_USER_RECOVERY every read parks while the command returned 0. The
> server cannot fetch the canceled commands again, so the device can't
> serve I/O until it restarts anyway.
>
> Return -ENODEV from START_DEV and END_USER_RECOVERY while ub->canceling
> is set. In ublk_ctrl_start_dev() check it and publish ub->ub_disk in one
> cancel_mutex section, and have ublk_start_cancel() read the disk in its
> cancel_mutex section. Today ublk_start_cancel() samples the disk before
> taking the mutex, so a server dying during its own START_DEV can mark
> the queues without quiescing a disk START_DEV published in between, with
> its first I/O past the canceling check. Now either START_DEV sees the
> cancel, or the cancel sees the disk and quiesces it before marking. The
> END_USER_RECOVERY check is best effort: the disk exists there, and a
> cancel after it is the ordinary death of the new server, which
> ublk_start_cancel() handles by quiescing and marking.
>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
> ---
> This applies on top of Ming's "[PATCH 0/8] ublk: don't dispatch to
> canceled io commands" and needs patch 1 of it for ub->canceling to stay
> set for the whole FETCH round. generic_18 still passes with it.
>
> Documentation/block/ublk.rst | 10 ++++++++--
> drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/block/ublk.rst b/Documentation/block/ublk.rst
> index 28300fee22bf..b7875a3cf3fc 100644
> --- a/Documentation/block/ublk.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/block/ublk.rst
> @@ -118,7 +118,11 @@ managing and controlling ublk devices with help of several control commands:
> After the server prepares userspace resources (such as creating I/O handler
> threads & io_uring for handling ublk IO), this command is sent to the
> driver for allocating & exposing ``/dev/ublkb*``. Parameters set via
> - ``UBLK_CMD_SET_PARAMS`` are applied for creating the device.
> + ``UBLK_CMD_SET_PARAMS`` are applied for creating the device. The command
> + fails with ``-ENODEV`` if an I/O command fetched by the current server
> + was canceled, because its io_uring is gone. The server can't fetch it
> + again, and the device can be started again once the server has closed
> + ``/dev/ublkc*``.
>
> - ``UBLK_CMD_STOP_DEV``
>
> @@ -195,7 +199,9 @@ managing and controlling ublk devices with help of several control commands:
> command is accepted after ublk device is quiesced and a new process has
> opened ``/dev/ublkc*`` and get all ublk queues be ready. When this command
> returns, ublk device is unquiesced and new I/O requests are passed to the
> - new process.
> + new process. It fails with ``-ENODEV`` if an I/O command of the new
> + process was canceled already. The recovery can be started over once the
> + new process has closed ``/dev/ublkc*``.
>
> - user recovery feature description
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> index f57d544c1da2..39eb7775a351 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> @@ -2759,9 +2759,11 @@ static void ublk_abort_queue(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq)
>
> static void ublk_start_cancel(struct ublk_device *ub)
> {
> - struct gendisk *disk = ublk_get_disk(ub);
> + struct gendisk *disk;
>
> + /* sync with ublk_ctrl_start_dev() publishing the disk */
> mutex_lock(&ub->cancel_mutex);
> + disk = ublk_get_disk(ub);
> if (ub->canceling)
> goto out;
>
> @@ -4575,6 +4577,7 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_start_dev(struct ublk_device *ub,
> .dma_alignment = 3,
> };
> struct gendisk *disk;
> + bool canceled;
> int ret = -EINVAL;
>
> if (ublksrv_pid <= 0)
> @@ -4665,8 +4668,24 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_start_dev(struct ublk_device *ub,
> disk->fops = &ub_fops;
> disk->private_data = ub;
>
> + /*
> + * A command of this FETCH round was canceled and can't be fetched
> + * again, don't bring up a disk over it. Check and publish the disk
> + * in one cancel_mutex section: either this sees ub->canceling, or
> + * ublk_start_cancel() sees the disk and quiesces it before marking
> + * the queues.
> + */
> + mutex_lock(&ub->cancel_mutex);
> + canceled = ub->canceling;
> + if (!canceled)
> + ub->ub_disk = disk;
> + mutex_unlock(&ub->cancel_mutex);
> + if (canceled) {
> + put_disk(disk);
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> ub->dev_info.ublksrv_pid = ub->ublksrv_tgid;
> - ub->ub_disk = disk;
>
> ublk_apply_params(ub);
>
> @@ -5238,6 +5257,7 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_end_recovery(struct ublk_device *ub,
> const struct ublksrv_ctrl_cmd *header)
> {
> int ublksrv_pid = (int)header->data[0];
> + bool canceled;
> int ret = -EINVAL;
>
> pr_devel("%s: Waiting for all FETCH_REQs, dev id %d...\n", __func__,
> @@ -5261,6 +5281,20 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_end_recovery(struct ublk_device *ub,
> ret = -EBUSY;
> goto out_unlock;
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * As in ublk_ctrl_start_dev(), a canceled command can't be fetched
> + * again. Best effort: the disk exists here, and a cancel after this
> + * check is the ordinary death of the new server, which
> + * ublk_start_cancel() handles by quiescing and marking.
> + */
> + mutex_lock(&ub->cancel_mutex);
> + canceled = ub->canceling;
> + mutex_unlock(&ub->cancel_mutex);
> + if (canceled) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> ub->dev_info.ublksrv_pid = ub->ublksrv_tgid;
> ub->dev_info.state = UBLK_S_DEV_LIVE;
> pr_devel("%s: new ublksrv_pid %d, dev id %d\n",
Hi Josef,
Thanks for the follow-up. The check and the cancel_mutex ordering
look right to me, but I'd suggest -EBUSY instead of -ENODEV.
-ENODEV means the ublk device is gone, and it isn't true in the
START_DEV/END_RECOVERY cases.
With -EBUSY:
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
thanks,
Ming
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-06 17:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20261001125422.1364260-1-tom.leiming@gmail.com>
2026-10-05 16:23 ` [PATCH] ublk: refuse to go live after an io command was canceled Josef Bacik
2026-10-06 14:14 ` Ming Lei
2026-10-05 16:23 ` [PATCH v2] " Josef Bacik
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox