* [PATCH v1] arm64: errata: Workaround NVIDIA Olympus device store/load ordering erratum
@ 2026-06-04 23:12 Shanker Donthineni
2026-06-05 8:01 ` Catalin Marinas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Shanker Donthineni @ 2026-06-04 23:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, linux-arm-kernel
Cc: Mark Rutland, linux-kernel, linux-doc, Shanker Donthineni,
Vikram Sethi, Jason Sequeira
On systems with NVIDIA Olympus cores, a Device-nGnR* load can be
observed by a peripheral before an older, non-overlapping Device-nGnR*
store to the same peripheral. This breaks the program-order guarantee
that software expects for Device-nGnR* accesses and can leave a
peripheral in an incorrect state, as a load is observed before an
earlier store takes effect.
The erratum can occur only when all of the following apply:
- A PE executes a Device-nGnR* store followed by a younger
Device-nGnR* load.
- The store is not a store-release.
- The accesses target the same peripheral and do not overlap in bytes.
- There is at most one intervening Device-nGnR* store in program
order, and there are no intervening Device-nGnR* loads.
- There is no DSB, and no DMB that orders loads, between the store and
the load.
- Specific micro-architectural and timing conditions occur.
Two ways to restore ordering: insert a barrier (any DSB, or a DMB that
orders loads) between the store and the load, or make the store a
store-release. A load-acquire on the load side would not help, because
acquire semantics do not prevent a load from being observed ahead of an
older store; only the store side (release or a barrier) closes the
window.
Promote the raw MMIO store helpers (__raw_writeb/w/l/q) from plain str*
to stlr* (Store-Release), which removes the "store is not a
store-release" condition for every device write the kernel issues.
Because writel() and writel_relaxed() are both built on __raw_writel()
in asm-generic/io.h, patching the raw variants covers both the
non-relaxed and relaxed APIs without touching the higher layers. Note
that writel()'s own barrier sits before the store, so it does not order
the store against a subsequent readl(); the store-release promotion is
what provides that ordering.
Like ARM64_ERRATUM_832075 on the load side, the change is gated on a new
ARM64_WORKAROUND_DEVICE_STORE_RELEASE capability and only activated on
parts that match MIDR_NVIDIA_OLYMPUS, so unaffected CPUs continue to use
the plain str* sequence.
Co-developed-by: Vikram Sethi <vsethi@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Vikram Sethi <vsethi@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>
---
Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst | 2 ++
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h | 24 ++++++++++++++-------
arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 8 +++++++
arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps | 1 +
5 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst b/Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
index 211119ce7adc..899bed3908bb 100644
--- a/Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
@@ -256,6 +256,8 @@ stable kernels.
+----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
| NVIDIA | Carmel Core | N/A | NVIDIA_CARMEL_CNP_ERRATUM |
+----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
+| NVIDIA | Olympus core | T410-OLY-1027 | NVIDIA_OLYMPUS_1027_ERRATUM |
++----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
| NVIDIA | T241 GICv3/4.x | T241-FABRIC-4 | N/A |
+----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
| NVIDIA | T241 MPAM | T241-MPAM-1 | N/A |
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index fe60738e5943..a6bac84b05a1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -564,6 +564,29 @@ config ARM64_ERRATUM_832075
If unsure, say Y.
+config NVIDIA_OLYMPUS_1027_ERRATUM
+ bool "NVIDIA Olympus: device store/load ordering erratum"
+ default y
+ help
+ This option adds an alternative code sequence to work around an
+ NVIDIA Olympus core erratum where a Device-nGnR* store can be
+ observed by a peripheral after a younger Device-nGnR* load to the
+ same peripheral. This breaks the program order that drivers rely
+ on for MMIO and can leave a device in an incorrect state.
+
+ The workaround promotes the raw MMIO store helpers
+ (__raw_writeb/w/l/q) to Store-Release (STLR), which restores the
+ required ordering. Because writel() and writel_relaxed() are built
+ on __raw_writel(), both are covered without changes to the higher
+ layers.
+
+ The fix is applied through the alternatives framework, so enabling
+ this option does not by itself activate the workaround: it is
+ patched in only when an affected CPU is detected, and is a no-op on
+ unaffected CPUs.
+
+ If unsure, say Y.
+
config ARM64_ERRATUM_834220
bool "Cortex-A57: 834220: Stage 2 translation fault might be incorrectly reported in presence of a Stage 1 fault (rare)"
depends on KVM
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h
index 8cbd1e96fd50..b6d7966e9c19 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h
@@ -25,29 +25,37 @@
#define __raw_writeb __raw_writeb
static __always_inline void __raw_writeb(u8 val, volatile void __iomem *addr)
{
- volatile u8 __iomem *ptr = addr;
- asm volatile("strb %w0, %1" : : "rZ" (val), "Qo" (*ptr));
+ asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE("strb %w0, [%1]",
+ "stlrb %w0, [%1]",
+ ARM64_WORKAROUND_DEVICE_STORE_RELEASE)
+ : : "rZ" (val), "r" (addr));
}
#define __raw_writew __raw_writew
static __always_inline void __raw_writew(u16 val, volatile void __iomem *addr)
{
- volatile u16 __iomem *ptr = addr;
- asm volatile("strh %w0, %1" : : "rZ" (val), "Qo" (*ptr));
+ asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE("strh %w0, [%1]",
+ "stlrh %w0, [%1]",
+ ARM64_WORKAROUND_DEVICE_STORE_RELEASE)
+ : : "rZ" (val), "r" (addr));
}
#define __raw_writel __raw_writel
static __always_inline void __raw_writel(u32 val, volatile void __iomem *addr)
{
- volatile u32 __iomem *ptr = addr;
- asm volatile("str %w0, %1" : : "rZ" (val), "Qo" (*ptr));
+ asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE("str %w0, [%1]",
+ "stlr %w0, [%1]",
+ ARM64_WORKAROUND_DEVICE_STORE_RELEASE)
+ : : "rZ" (val), "r" (addr));
}
#define __raw_writeq __raw_writeq
static __always_inline void __raw_writeq(u64 val, volatile void __iomem *addr)
{
- volatile u64 __iomem *ptr = addr;
- asm volatile("str %x0, %1" : : "rZ" (val), "Qo" (*ptr));
+ asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE("str %x0, [%1]",
+ "stlr %x0, [%1]",
+ ARM64_WORKAROUND_DEVICE_STORE_RELEASE)
+ : : "rZ" (val), "r" (addr));
}
#define __raw_readb __raw_readb
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
index 5377e4c2eba2..958d7f16bfeb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
@@ -809,6 +809,14 @@ const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_errata[] = {
ERRATA_MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_NVIDIA_CARMEL),
},
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_NVIDIA_OLYMPUS_1027_ERRATUM
+ {
+ /* NVIDIA Olympus core */
+ .desc = "NVIDIA Olympus device load/store ordering erratum",
+ .capability = ARM64_WORKAROUND_DEVICE_STORE_RELEASE,
+ ERRATA_MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_NVIDIA_OLYMPUS),
+ },
+#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_WORKAROUND_TRBE_OVERWRITE_FILL_MODE
{
/*
diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
index 811c2479e82d..d367257bf770 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
+++ b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
@@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_TX2_219_PRFM
WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_TX2_219_TVM
WORKAROUND_CLEAN_CACHE
WORKAROUND_DEVICE_LOAD_ACQUIRE
+WORKAROUND_DEVICE_STORE_RELEASE
WORKAROUND_NVIDIA_CARMEL_CNP
WORKAROUND_PMUV3_IMPDEF_TRAPS
WORKAROUND_QCOM_FALKOR_E1003
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] arm64: errata: Workaround NVIDIA Olympus device store/load ordering erratum
2026-06-04 23:12 [PATCH v1] arm64: errata: Workaround NVIDIA Olympus device store/load ordering erratum Shanker Donthineni
@ 2026-06-05 8:01 ` Catalin Marinas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Catalin Marinas @ 2026-06-05 8:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shanker Donthineni
Cc: Will Deacon, linux-arm-kernel, Mark Rutland, linux-kernel,
linux-doc, Vikram Sethi, Jason Sequeira
On Thu, Jun 04, 2026 at 06:12:54PM -0500, Shanker Donthineni wrote:
> On systems with NVIDIA Olympus cores, a Device-nGnR* load can be
> observed by a peripheral before an older, non-overlapping Device-nGnR*
> store to the same peripheral. This breaks the program-order guarantee
> that software expects for Device-nGnR* accesses and can leave a
> peripheral in an incorrect state, as a load is observed before an
> earlier store takes effect.
>
> The erratum can occur only when all of the following apply:
>
> - A PE executes a Device-nGnR* store followed by a younger
> Device-nGnR* load.
> - The store is not a store-release.
> - The accesses target the same peripheral and do not overlap in bytes.
> - There is at most one intervening Device-nGnR* store in program
> order, and there are no intervening Device-nGnR* loads.
> - There is no DSB, and no DMB that orders loads, between the store and
> the load.
> - Specific micro-architectural and timing conditions occur.
>
> Two ways to restore ordering: insert a barrier (any DSB, or a DMB that
> orders loads) between the store and the load, or make the store a
> store-release. A load-acquire on the load side would not help, because
> acquire semantics do not prevent a load from being observed ahead of an
> older store; only the store side (release or a barrier) closes the
> window.
Ignoring Device-nGnR*, a store-release followed by a load (not
load-acquire) would not guarantee any ordering. I assume the
store-release behaviour is specific to this erratum - part of the
preconditions.
The patch looks fine to me.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-05 8:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-04 23:12 [PATCH v1] arm64: errata: Workaround NVIDIA Olympus device store/load ordering erratum Shanker Donthineni
2026-06-05 8:01 ` Catalin Marinas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox