From: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, "Joerg Roedel (AMD)" <joro@8bytes.org>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jpb@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
patches@lists.linux.dev, Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>,
Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
Vijayanand Jitta <vijayanand.jitta@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Precompute the invalidation commands
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 14:27:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ap7J6NKXgWhiwXgL@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6-v5-b810cf379bfc+13d738-smmu_tlbi_jgg@nvidia.com>
On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 02:49:55PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Store the required cmd data in the tlbi and just copy it out when
> processing each item in the invs list. The cmd form only depends on
> if the instance supports RIL or not, otherwise it is always the same.
>
> This avoids redundant calculations for each invs entry.
As I mentioned on v2, I don’t see a value for this without smmu
sharing over the same domain, as this just adds extra complexity IMHO,
but that's up to Robin and Will.
Thanks,
Mostafa
>
> Reviewed-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 141 +++++++++++---------
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h | 12 +-
> 2 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index 68dd7b69392737..883dfc584ed6c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -2506,14 +2506,12 @@ static struct arm_smmu_ril_range arm_smmu_ril_init_end(u64 last_tg, u64 num_tg)
> return ril;
> }
>
> -static void arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_add_ril(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> - struct arm_smmu_cmdq_batch *cmds,
> - struct arm_smmu_cmd *ref_cmd,
> - bool leaf_only,
> +static void arm_smmu_tlbi_add_range_cmd(struct arm_smmu_tlbi *tlbi,
> const struct arm_smmu_ril_range *ril,
> u8 ttl, u8 tg_enc)
> {
> - struct arm_smmu_cmd cmd;
> + struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmd =
> + &tlbi->range.cmds[tlbi->range.num_cmds++];
> unsigned int tgsz_lg2 = tg_enc * 2 + 10;
> u64 iova = ril->start_tg << tgsz_lg2;
> unsigned int num = ril->num - 1;
> @@ -2542,18 +2540,16 @@ static void arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_add_ril(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> if (!num && !ril->scale && !ttl)
> tg_enc = 0;
>
> - cmd.data[0] = ref_cmd->data[0] | FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_TLBI_0_NUM, num) |
> - FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_TLBI_0_SCALE, ril->scale);
> - cmd.data[1] = ref_cmd->data[1] |
> - FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_TLBI_1_LEAF, leaf_only) |
> - FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_TLBI_1_TTL, ttl) |
> - FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_TLBI_1_TG, tg_enc) | iova;
> - arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_add_cmd_p(smmu, cmds, &cmd);
> + cmd->data[0] = FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_TLBI_0_NUM, num) |
> + FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_TLBI_0_SCALE, ril->scale);
> + cmd->data[1] = FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_TLBI_1_LEAF, tlbi->leaf_only) |
> + FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_TLBI_1_TTL, ttl) |
> + FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_TLBI_1_TG, tg_enc) | iova;
> }
>
> /*
> - * Issue up to two range TLBI commands covering [iova, iova+size). Returns true
> - * if successful, false if the range is too large to fit into RIL commands.
> + * Generate up to two range TLBI command payloads covering [iova, iova+size).
> + * Sets use_full_inv if the range is too large to represent.
> *
> * Normally the first RIL is the largest representable span which does not
> * exceed the requested range. If necessary, the second RIL is the smallest
> @@ -2561,14 +2557,12 @@ static void arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_add_ril(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> * excess coverage from the second RIL overlaps the first instead of exceeding
> * the requested range.
> *
> - * If a SVA is being invalidated and the SMMU has the ARM_SMMU_OPT_FULL_CONT_RIL
> - * errata this produces only a single RIL and overinvalidates to ensure any
> - * potential CONT is covered with a single RIL.
> + * For SVA on an invs containing an SMMU with ARM_SMMU_OPT_FULL_CONT_RIL,
> + * produce only a single RIL and overinvalidate so any potential CONT is
> + * covered by one command.
> */
> -static bool arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_add_range(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> - struct arm_smmu_cmdq_batch *cmds,
> - struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmd,
> - struct arm_smmu_tlbi *tlbi)
> +static void arm_smmu_tlbi_calc_range(struct arm_smmu_tlbi *tlbi,
> + bool single_ril)
> {
> u8 tgsz_lg2 = tlbi->tgsz_lg2;
> struct arm_smmu_ril_range first = { .start_tg = tlbi->iova >>
> @@ -2579,9 +2573,6 @@ static bool arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_add_range(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> struct arm_smmu_ril_range trail;
> u8 ttl = 0;
>
> - if (!tlbi->size)
> - return false;
> -
> /*
> * Determine what level the granule is at. For non-leaf, both
> * io-pgtable and SVA pass a nominal last-level granule because they
> @@ -2602,10 +2593,11 @@ static bool arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_add_range(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> first.scale = fls64((num_tg - 1) / 32);
> if (first.scale > 31) {
> /* Range too large for a single command do full invalidation */
> - return false;
> + tlbi->range.use_full_inv = true;
> + return;
> }
>
> - if (tlbi->has_cont && (smmu->options & ARM_SMMU_OPT_FULL_CONT_RIL)) {
> + if (single_ril) {
> /*
> * Produce a single invalidation by rounding up and disabling
> * the trailer.
> @@ -2621,40 +2613,27 @@ static bool arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_add_range(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> trail = arm_smmu_ril_init_end(
> last_tg, num_tg - ((u64)first.num << first.scale));
> }
> - arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_add_ril(smmu, cmds, cmd, tlbi->leaf_only, &first,
> - ttl, tg_enc);
> + arm_smmu_tlbi_add_range_cmd(tlbi, &first, ttl, tg_enc);
>
> if (trail.num)
> - arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_add_ril(smmu, cmds, cmd, tlbi->leaf_only,
> - &trail, ttl, tg_enc);
> - return true;
> + arm_smmu_tlbi_add_range_cmd(tlbi, &trail, ttl, tg_enc);
> }
>
> /*
> * One TLBI command per IOTLB entry, assuming the entries are all at least
> - * iopte_granule sized. Returns false if too many commands would be needed which
> - * indicates too high a latency. The threshold is similar to MAX_DVM_OPS in
> - * arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h for the 4k PAGE_SIZE.
> + * iopte_granule sized. Sets use_full_inv if too many commands would be needed
> + * which indicates too high a latency. The threshold is similar to MAX_DVM_OPS
> + * in arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h for the 4k PAGE_SIZE.
> */
> -static bool arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_add_single(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> - struct arm_smmu_cmdq_batch *cmds,
> - struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmd,
> - struct arm_smmu_tlbi *tlbi)
> +static void arm_smmu_tlbi_calc_single(struct arm_smmu_tlbi *tlbi)
> {
> unsigned long num_ops = tlbi->size / tlbi->iopte_size;
> - unsigned long iova = tlbi->iova;
> - unsigned long i;
>
> - if (!num_ops || num_ops > 512)
> - return false;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < num_ops; i++) {
> - cmd->data[1] = FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_TLBI_1_LEAF, tlbi->leaf_only) |
> - (iova & ~GENMASK_U64(11, 0));
> - arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_add_cmd_p(smmu, cmds, cmd);
> - iova += tlbi->iopte_size;
> + if (!num_ops || num_ops > 512) {
> + tlbi->single.use_full_inv = true;
> + return;
> }
> - return true;
> + tlbi->single.num = num_ops;
> }
>
> static void arm_smmu_inv_all_cmd(struct arm_smmu_inv *inv,
> @@ -2674,16 +2653,37 @@ static bool arm_smmu_inv_to_cmdq_batch(struct arm_smmu_inv *inv,
> struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmd,
> struct arm_smmu_tlbi *tlbi)
> {
> + u64 iova = tlbi->iova;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> if (inv->smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_RANGE_INV) {
> - if (arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_add_range(inv->smmu, cmds, cmd, tlbi))
> - return false;
> - } else {
> - if (arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_add_single(inv->smmu, cmds, cmd, tlbi))
> - return false;
> + if (tlbi->range.use_full_inv) {
> + arm_smmu_inv_all_cmd(inv, cmds, cmd);
> + return true;
> + }
> + for (i = 0; i < tlbi->range.num_cmds; i++) {
> + struct arm_smmu_cmd range_cmd = tlbi->range.cmds[i];
> +
> + range_cmd.data[0] |= cmd->data[0];
> + range_cmd.data[1] |= cmd->data[1];
> + arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_add_cmd_p(inv->smmu, cmds,
> + &range_cmd);
> + }
> + return false;
> }
>
> - arm_smmu_inv_all_cmd(inv, cmds, cmd);
> - return true;
> + if (tlbi->single.use_full_inv) {
> + arm_smmu_inv_all_cmd(inv, cmds, cmd);
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < tlbi->single.num; i++) {
> + cmd->data[1] = FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_TLBI_1_LEAF, tlbi->leaf_only) |
> + (iova & ~GENMASK_U64(11, 0));
> + iova += tlbi->iopte_size;
> + arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_add_cmd_p(inv->smmu, cmds, cmd);
> + }
> + return false;
> }
>
> static inline bool arm_smmu_invs_end_batch(struct arm_smmu_inv *cur,
> @@ -2702,8 +2702,8 @@ static inline bool arm_smmu_invs_end_batch(struct arm_smmu_inv *cur,
> return false;
> }
>
> -static void __arm_smmu_domain_inv_range(struct arm_smmu_tlbi *tlbi,
> - struct arm_smmu_invs *invs)
> +static void arm_smmu_domain_tlbi_inv(struct arm_smmu_tlbi *tlbi,
> + struct arm_smmu_invs *invs)
> {
> struct arm_smmu_inv *used_s12_vmall = NULL;
> struct arm_smmu_cmdq_batch cmds = {};
> @@ -2798,11 +2798,17 @@ void arm_smmu_domain_inv_range(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> .iova = iova,
> .size = size,
> .iopte_size = granule,
> - .has_cont = smmu_domain->stage == ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_SVA,
> .leaf_only = leaf,
> };
> struct arm_smmu_invs *invs;
>
> + if (!size || size == SIZE_MAX) {
> + tlbi.single.use_full_inv = true;
> + tlbi.range.use_full_inv = true;
> + } else {
> + arm_smmu_tlbi_calc_single(&tlbi);
> + }
> +
> /*
> * An invalidation request must follow some IOPTE change and then load
> * an invalidation array. In the meantime, a domain attachment mutates
> @@ -2833,6 +2839,19 @@ void arm_smmu_domain_inv_range(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> rcu_read_lock();
> invs = rcu_dereference(smmu_domain->invs);
>
> + /*
> + * Only precalculate RIL if it will be used, invs generation ensures
> + * this matches the instances used for invalidation.
> + */
> + if (invs->has_range_inv) {
> + if (!tlbi.range.use_full_inv) {
> + arm_smmu_tlbi_calc_range(
> + &tlbi,
> + smmu_domain->stage == ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_SVA &&
> + invs->has_full_cont_ril);
> + }
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Avoid locking unless ATS is being used. No ATC invalidation can be
> * going on after a domain is detached.
> @@ -2841,10 +2860,10 @@ void arm_smmu_domain_inv_range(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> unsigned long flags;
>
> read_lock_irqsave(&invs->rwlock, flags);
> - __arm_smmu_domain_inv_range(&tlbi, invs);
> + arm_smmu_domain_tlbi_inv(&tlbi, invs);
> read_unlock_irqrestore(&invs->rwlock, flags);
> } else {
> - __arm_smmu_domain_inv_range(&tlbi, invs);
> + arm_smmu_domain_tlbi_inv(&tlbi, invs);
> }
>
> rcu_read_unlock();
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> index 4b9f04825eefa2..33ef99775aea87 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> @@ -815,8 +815,18 @@ struct arm_smmu_tlbi {
> unsigned int iopte_size;
> /* Base Translation Granule of the page table */
> u8 tgsz_lg2;
> - bool has_cont;
> bool leaf_only;
> +
> + struct {
> + bool use_full_inv;
> + u16 num;
> + } single;
> +
> + struct {
> + bool use_full_inv;
> + u8 num_cmds;
> + struct arm_smmu_cmd cmds[2];
> + } range;
> };
>
> struct arm_smmu_evtq {
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 17:49 [PATCH v5 0/9] Organize the SMMUv3 invalidation flow so iommupt can use it Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-01 17:49 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Handle ARM erratum for CONT under invalidation with SVA Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-07 14:21 ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-09-07 15:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-07 15:17 ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-09-07 15:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-01 17:49 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pass the parameters for the invalidation in a struct Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-01 17:49 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move pgsize out of arm_smmu_inv Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-07 14:22 ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-09-01 17:49 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Optimize range invalidation for latency Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-07 14:26 ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-09-07 15:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-07 19:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-01 17:49 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Keep track in the arm_smmu_invs if RIL is used Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-01 17:49 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Precompute the invalidation commands Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-07 14:27 ` Mostafa Saleh [this message]
2026-09-07 15:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-01 17:49 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Populate the tlbi at the top of the call chain Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-01 17:49 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Change how the tlbi describes the invalidation Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-07 14:42 ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-09-07 15:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-09 15:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-01 17:49 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support the DS expansion of RIL's SCALE Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-07 14:44 ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-09-07 19:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ap7J6NKXgWhiwXgL@google.com \
--to=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jpb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vijayanand.jitta@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox