Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] x86/resctrl: Track llc_occupancy of RMIDs in limbo list

[Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>]

On 4/8/2024 8:29 AM, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 03:44:00PM +0800, Haifeng Xu wrote:
>> I can also reproduced it. After digging into it, I found that our DKIM signature header
>> has 't' and 'x' flags. They are recommended as a means to help identify spam.
>>
>> t= is the DKIM signature timestamp.
>> x= is the DKIM signature expiration time.
>>
>> The source code of DKIM Validation can be seen in dkim/__init__.py(line 351), I paste it
>> here.
>>
>>  343     if b'x' in sig:
>>  344         if re.match(br"\d+$", sig[b'x']) is None:
>>  345             raise ValidationError(
>>  346               "x= value is not a decimal integer (%s)" % sig[b'x'])
>>  347         x_sign = int(sig[b'x'])
>>  348         now = int(time.time())
>>  349         slop = 36000 # 10H leeway for mailers with inaccurate clocks
>>  350         if x_sign < now - slop:
>>  351             raise ValidationError(
>>  352                 "x= value is past (%s)" % sig[b'x'])
>>  353             if x_sign < t_sign:
>>  354                 raise ValidationError(
>>  355                     "x= value is less than t= value (x=%s t=%s)" %
>>  356                     (sig[b'x'], sig[b't']))
>>
>> The expiry time is less than the time point you download the patch, so the validation
>> fails. If I comment out these lines, this series can be successfully downloaded.
> 
> FWIW, I've requested ability to ignore the x= flag when validating signatures:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/dkimpy/+bug/2047054

Thank you very much Haifeng and Konstantin.

Reinette