[PATCH 5/5] docs: fix repeated word 'at' in journalling.rst

[PATCH 5/5] docs: fix repeated word 'at' in journalling.rst

[Adrien Reynard]

Signed-off-by: Adrien Reynard <reynard.adrien.08@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst
index 863e93e623f7..2825f6c030c2 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ easily as on jbd2_journal_start().
 
 Try to reserve the right number of blocks the first time. ;-). This will
 be the maximum number of blocks you are going to touch in this
-transaction. I advise having a look at at least ext4_jbd.h to see the
+transaction. I advise having a look at least ext4_jbd.h to see the
 basis on which ext4 uses to make these decisions.
 
 Another wriggle to watch out for is your on-disk block allocation
-- 
2.54.0

Re: [PATCH 5/5] docs: fix repeated word 'at' in journalling.rst

[Shuah Khan]

On 5/8/26 10:38, Adrien Reynard wrote:

Missing change log

> Signed-off-by: Adrien Reynard <reynard.adrien.08@gmail.com>
> ---
>   Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst
> index 863e93e623f7..2825f6c030c2 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ easily as on jbd2_journal_start().
>   
>   Try to reserve the right number of blocks the first time. ;-). This will
>   be the maximum number of blocks you are going to touch in this
> -transaction. I advise having a look at at least ext4_jbd.h to see the

I don't think there is an extra "at" here - the second one "at least"
is in here to emphasize the need to look at ext4_jbd.h

It could be re-written as:
"I advise understanding the basis on which ext4 uses to make these decisions
which is detailed in ext4_jbd.h"


> +transaction. I advise having a look at least ext4_jbd.h to see the


>   basis on which ext4 uses to make these decisions.
>   
>   Another wriggle to watch out for is your on-disk block allocation

With these suggested changes made:

Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah