Linux Documentation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
To: "Li,Rongqing(ACG CCN)" <lirongqing@baidu.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>, Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: 答复: [外部邮件] Re: [PATCH] mm/mempool: use static key for boot-time debug enablement
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 11:33:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ddb499d5-6821-4fa7-9fec-563bdfbc8cbc@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fcf5585aba18414cbd0ab01935eeb1df@baidu.com>



On 28/05/2026 04:00, Li,Rongqing(ACG CCN) wrote:
>>> From: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
>>>
>>> Replace the #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON conditional compilation with a
>>> static key (mempool_debug_enabled). This allows enabling mempool
>>> debugging at boot time via:
>>>
>>>     mempool_debug
>>>
>>> Instead of requiring CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON at compile time. Benefits:
>>>
>>> - Debugging can be enabled without rebuilding the kernel
>>> - Uses standard kernel static_key mechanism with minimal overhead
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
>>> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>
>>> Cc: Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>
>>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>>> Cc: Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>
>>> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>
>>> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
>>> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
>>> ---
>>>  Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt |  5 ++++
>>>  mm/mempool.c                                    | 32
>> ++++++++++++++++++-------
>>>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>>> b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>>> index 35ed9dc..5a070e6 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>>> @@ -3998,6 +3998,11 @@ Kernel parameters
>>>  			Note that even when enabled, there are a few cases where
>>>  			the feature is not effective.
>>>
>>> +	mempool_debug	[MM]
>>> +			Enable mempool debugging. This enables element
>>> +			poison checking when freeing elements back to the
>>> +			pool. Useful for debugging mempool corruption.
>>> +
>>>  	memtest=	[KNL,X86,ARM,M68K,PPC,RISCV,EARLY] Enable memtest
>>>  			Format: <integer>
>>>  			default : 0 <disable>
>>> diff --git a/mm/mempool.c b/mm/mempool.c index db23e0e..4f429a1
>> 100644
>>> --- a/mm/mempool.c
>>> +++ b/mm/mempool.c
>>> @@ -16,11 +16,28 @@
>>>  #include <linux/export.h>
>>>  #include <linux/mempool.h>
>>>  #include <linux/writeback.h>
>>> +#include <linux/static_key.h>
>>> +#include <linux/init.h>
>>>  #include "slab.h"
>>>
>>>  static DECLARE_FAULT_ATTR(fail_mempool_alloc);
>>>  static DECLARE_FAULT_ATTR(fail_mempool_alloc_bulk);
>>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * Debugging support for mempool using static key.
>>> + *
>>> + * This allows enabling mempool debug at boot time via:
>>> + *   mempool_debug
>>> + */
>>> +static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(mempool_debug_enabled);
>>> +
>>> +static int __init mempool_debug_setup(char *str) {
>>> +	static_branch_enable(&mempool_debug_enabled);
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +early_param("mempool_debug", mempool_debug_setup);
>>> +
>>
>> Can static_branch_enable() in mempool_debug_setup() run before
>> jump_label_init() has set static_key_initialized?
>>
>> Looking at start_kernel() in init/main.c:
>>
>> 	setup_arch(&command_line);
>> 	mm_core_init_early();
>> 	/* Static keys and static calls are needed by LSMs */
>> 	jump_label_init();
>> 	...
>> 	/* parameters may set static keys */
>> 	parse_early_param();
>>
>> This will trigger the warning in include/linux/jump_label.h has:
>>
>> 	#define STATIC_KEY_CHECK_USE(key) WARN(!static_key_initialized, \
>> 	    "%s(): static key '%pS' used before call to jump_label_init()", \
>> 	    __func__, (key))
>>
>>
>> mm/dmapool.c registers an equivalent debug toggle via __setup() rather than
>> early_param():
>>
>> 	static int __init dmapool_debug_setup(char *str)
>> 	{
>> 		static_branch_enable(&dmapool_debug_enabled);
>> 		return 1;
>> 	}
>> 	__setup("dmapool_debug", dmapool_debug_setup);
>>
>> I think you can reuse that.
> 
> Thanks for your review!
> 
> While this boot-time ordering used to be a generic issue, it seems many
> architectures have already aligned or fixed this internally. For instance,
> 
> commit ca829e05d3d4 ("powerpc/64: Init jump labels before parse_early_param()")
> and commit 6070970db9fe ("m68k: Initialize jump labels early during setup_arch()")
> explicitly relocated jump_label_init() before the early parameter parsing.
> 

I think 32 bit ARM doesnt? 

> Furthermore, leveraging early_param() to directly manage static keys is still
> actively used and accepted in the current core kernel. Some examples include:
> 
>   - early_param("randomize_kstack_offset", early_randomize_kstack_offset);
>   - early_param("threadirqs", setup_forced_irqthreads);
> 
> The primary reason for using early_param() here instead of __setup() is that
> mempool allocations can happen extremely early during the boot phase. Moving
> this to a later stage like __setup() would mean missing the tracking for the
> most critical early-stage memory pools, which defeats the purpose of boot-time
> debugging.

Ack

> 
> Therefore, I think using early_param() here is the most robust option to
> ensure full coverage of mempool allocations.
> 
> What do you think?
> > Thanks
> 
> -Li
> 
> 
>>
>>>  static int __init mempool_faul_inject_init(void)  {
>>>  	int error;
>>> @@ -37,7 +54,6 @@ static int __init mempool_faul_inject_init(void)  }
>>> late_initcall(mempool_faul_inject_init);
>>>
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON
>>>  static void poison_error(struct mempool *pool, void *element, size_t size,
>>>  			 size_t byte)
>>>  {
>>> @@ -73,6 +89,9 @@ static void __check_element(struct mempool *pool,
>>> void *element, size_t size)
>>>
>>>  static void check_element(struct mempool *pool, void *element)  {
>>> +	if (!static_branch_unlikely(&mempool_debug_enabled))
>>> +		return;
>>> +
>>>  	/* Skip checking: KASAN might save its metadata in the element. */
>>>  	if (kasan_enabled())
>>>  		return;
>>> @@ -112,6 +131,9 @@ static void __poison_element(void *element, size_t
>>> size)
>>>
>>>  static void poison_element(struct mempool *pool, void *element)  {
>>> +	if (!static_branch_unlikely(&mempool_debug_enabled))
>>> +		return;
>>> +
>>
>> Before this change, building with CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON=y compiled in
>> check_element() and poison_element() unconditionally, so the poisoning and
>> corruption checks ran on every mempool free/alloc.
>> After this change those checks are gated on the mempool_debug boot parameter
>> even when CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON=y.
>>
>> Existing users who relied on CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON=y giving them mempool
>> poison checking will silently lose it on upgrade unless they also add
>> "mempool_debug" to the command line.
>>
>> Would it be worth defaulting the static key to true under
>> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON=y, for example:
>>
>> 	#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON
>> 	static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(mempool_debug_enabled);
>> 	#else
>> 	static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(mempool_debug_enabled);
>> 	#endif
>>
>> so the previous default behaviour is preserved.
>>
>>
>>>  	/* Skip poisoning: KASAN might save its metadata in the element. */
>>>  	if (kasan_enabled())
>>>  		return;
>>> @@ -140,14 +162,6 @@ static void poison_element(struct mempool *pool,
>>> void *element)  #endif
>>>  	}
>>>  }
>>> -#else /* CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON */
>>> -static inline void check_element(struct mempool *pool, void *element)
>>> -{ -} -static inline void poison_element(struct mempool *pool, void
>>> *element) -{ -} -#endif /* CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON */
>>>
>>>  static __always_inline bool kasan_poison_element(struct mempool *pool,
>>>  		void *element)
>>> --
>>> 2.9.4
>>>
>>>


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-28 10:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-27 10:46 [PATCH] mm/mempool: use static key for boot-time debug enablement lirongqing
2026-05-27 13:03 ` Usama Arif
2026-05-27 16:43   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-05-28  3:00   ` 答复: [外部邮件] " Li,Rongqing(ACG CCN)
2026-05-28 10:33     ` Usama Arif [this message]
2026-05-28 10:50       ` 答复: " Li,Rongqing(ACG CCN)
2026-05-28 12:59         ` Usama Arif
2026-05-27 20:06 ` Andrew Morton
2026-05-28  7:54   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-05-27 21:29 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2026-05-27 22:13   ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-05-27 23:06     ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2026-05-27 23:09       ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-05-28  7:57         ` 答复: [????] " Li,Rongqing(ACG CCN)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ddb499d5-6821-4fa7-9fec-563bdfbc8cbc@linux.dev \
    --to=usama.arif@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
    --cc=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox