From: "Li,Rongqing(ACG CCN)" <lirongqing@baidu.com>
To: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>, Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, "Christoph Lameter" <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: 答复: [外部邮件] Re: [PATCH] mm/mempool: use static key for boot-time debug enablement
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 03:00:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fcf5585aba18414cbd0ab01935eeb1df@baidu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260527130337.983366-1-usama.arif@linux.dev>
> > From: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
> >
> > Replace the #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON conditional compilation with a
> > static key (mempool_debug_enabled). This allows enabling mempool
> > debugging at boot time via:
> >
> > mempool_debug
> >
> > Instead of requiring CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON at compile time. Benefits:
> >
> > - Debugging can be enabled without rebuilding the kernel
> > - Uses standard kernel static_key mechanism with minimal overhead
> >
> > Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
> > Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>
> > Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>
> > Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> > Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
> > ---
> > Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 5 ++++
> > mm/mempool.c | 32
> ++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > index 35ed9dc..5a070e6 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > @@ -3998,6 +3998,11 @@ Kernel parameters
> > Note that even when enabled, there are a few cases where
> > the feature is not effective.
> >
> > + mempool_debug [MM]
> > + Enable mempool debugging. This enables element
> > + poison checking when freeing elements back to the
> > + pool. Useful for debugging mempool corruption.
> > +
> > memtest= [KNL,X86,ARM,M68K,PPC,RISCV,EARLY] Enable memtest
> > Format: <integer>
> > default : 0 <disable>
> > diff --git a/mm/mempool.c b/mm/mempool.c index db23e0e..4f429a1
> 100644
> > --- a/mm/mempool.c
> > +++ b/mm/mempool.c
> > @@ -16,11 +16,28 @@
> > #include <linux/export.h>
> > #include <linux/mempool.h>
> > #include <linux/writeback.h>
> > +#include <linux/static_key.h>
> > +#include <linux/init.h>
> > #include "slab.h"
> >
> > static DECLARE_FAULT_ATTR(fail_mempool_alloc);
> > static DECLARE_FAULT_ATTR(fail_mempool_alloc_bulk);
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Debugging support for mempool using static key.
> > + *
> > + * This allows enabling mempool debug at boot time via:
> > + * mempool_debug
> > + */
> > +static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(mempool_debug_enabled);
> > +
> > +static int __init mempool_debug_setup(char *str) {
> > + static_branch_enable(&mempool_debug_enabled);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +early_param("mempool_debug", mempool_debug_setup);
> > +
>
> Can static_branch_enable() in mempool_debug_setup() run before
> jump_label_init() has set static_key_initialized?
>
> Looking at start_kernel() in init/main.c:
>
> setup_arch(&command_line);
> mm_core_init_early();
> /* Static keys and static calls are needed by LSMs */
> jump_label_init();
> ...
> /* parameters may set static keys */
> parse_early_param();
>
> This will trigger the warning in include/linux/jump_label.h has:
>
> #define STATIC_KEY_CHECK_USE(key) WARN(!static_key_initialized, \
> "%s(): static key '%pS' used before call to jump_label_init()", \
> __func__, (key))
>
>
> mm/dmapool.c registers an equivalent debug toggle via __setup() rather than
> early_param():
>
> static int __init dmapool_debug_setup(char *str)
> {
> static_branch_enable(&dmapool_debug_enabled);
> return 1;
> }
> __setup("dmapool_debug", dmapool_debug_setup);
>
> I think you can reuse that.
Thanks for your review!
While this boot-time ordering used to be a generic issue, it seems many
architectures have already aligned or fixed this internally. For instance,
commit ca829e05d3d4 ("powerpc/64: Init jump labels before parse_early_param()")
and commit 6070970db9fe ("m68k: Initialize jump labels early during setup_arch()")
explicitly relocated jump_label_init() before the early parameter parsing.
Furthermore, leveraging early_param() to directly manage static keys is still
actively used and accepted in the current core kernel. Some examples include:
- early_param("randomize_kstack_offset", early_randomize_kstack_offset);
- early_param("threadirqs", setup_forced_irqthreads);
The primary reason for using early_param() here instead of __setup() is that
mempool allocations can happen extremely early during the boot phase. Moving
this to a later stage like __setup() would mean missing the tracking for the
most critical early-stage memory pools, which defeats the purpose of boot-time
debugging.
Therefore, I think using early_param() here is the most robust option to
ensure full coverage of mempool allocations.
What do you think?
Thanks
-Li
>
> > static int __init mempool_faul_inject_init(void) {
> > int error;
> > @@ -37,7 +54,6 @@ static int __init mempool_faul_inject_init(void) }
> > late_initcall(mempool_faul_inject_init);
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON
> > static void poison_error(struct mempool *pool, void *element, size_t size,
> > size_t byte)
> > {
> > @@ -73,6 +89,9 @@ static void __check_element(struct mempool *pool,
> > void *element, size_t size)
> >
> > static void check_element(struct mempool *pool, void *element) {
> > + if (!static_branch_unlikely(&mempool_debug_enabled))
> > + return;
> > +
> > /* Skip checking: KASAN might save its metadata in the element. */
> > if (kasan_enabled())
> > return;
> > @@ -112,6 +131,9 @@ static void __poison_element(void *element, size_t
> > size)
> >
> > static void poison_element(struct mempool *pool, void *element) {
> > + if (!static_branch_unlikely(&mempool_debug_enabled))
> > + return;
> > +
>
> Before this change, building with CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON=y compiled in
> check_element() and poison_element() unconditionally, so the poisoning and
> corruption checks ran on every mempool free/alloc.
> After this change those checks are gated on the mempool_debug boot parameter
> even when CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON=y.
>
> Existing users who relied on CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON=y giving them mempool
> poison checking will silently lose it on upgrade unless they also add
> "mempool_debug" to the command line.
>
> Would it be worth defaulting the static key to true under
> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON=y, for example:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON
> static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(mempool_debug_enabled);
> #else
> static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(mempool_debug_enabled);
> #endif
>
> so the previous default behaviour is preserved.
>
>
> > /* Skip poisoning: KASAN might save its metadata in the element. */
> > if (kasan_enabled())
> > return;
> > @@ -140,14 +162,6 @@ static void poison_element(struct mempool *pool,
> > void *element) #endif
> > }
> > }
> > -#else /* CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON */
> > -static inline void check_element(struct mempool *pool, void *element)
> > -{ -} -static inline void poison_element(struct mempool *pool, void
> > *element) -{ -} -#endif /* CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON */
> >
> > static __always_inline bool kasan_poison_element(struct mempool *pool,
> > void *element)
> > --
> > 2.9.4
> >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-28 3:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-27 10:46 [PATCH] mm/mempool: use static key for boot-time debug enablement lirongqing
2026-05-27 13:03 ` Usama Arif
2026-05-27 16:43 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-05-28 3:00 ` Li,Rongqing(ACG CCN) [this message]
2026-05-28 10:33 ` 答复: [外部邮件] " Usama Arif
2026-05-28 10:50 ` 答复: " Li,Rongqing(ACG CCN)
2026-05-28 12:59 ` Usama Arif
2026-05-27 20:06 ` Andrew Morton
2026-05-28 7:54 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-05-27 21:29 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2026-05-27 22:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-05-27 23:06 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2026-05-27 23:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-05-28 7:57 ` 答复: [????] " Li,Rongqing(ACG CCN)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fcf5585aba18414cbd0ab01935eeb1df@baidu.com \
--to=lirongqing@baidu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox