* [1/3] ACPI / blacklist: add acpi_match_oemlist() interface
@ 2017-07-18 19:32 Borislav Petkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2017-07-18 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kani, Toshimitsu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mchehab@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com, lenb@kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 06:49:51PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> ghes_edac uses this structure as a while-list, so the term backlist is
> misleading.
So this matching function gets both blacklists and whitelists. No wonder
it is confusing. Now I finally understand what you wanna do: you want to
call all those lists something agnostic as platform_list or so because
they contain exactly that: platforms - not OEMs.
And then you want to match *platforms*. *Not* OEMs.
*Now* I understand what you're trying to tell me.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [1/3] ACPI / blacklist: add acpi_match_oemlist() interface
@ 2017-07-18 20:17 Toshi Kani
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Toshi Kani @ 2017-07-18 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bp@alien8.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mchehab@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com, lenb@kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 21:32 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 06:49:51PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> > ghes_edac uses this structure as a while-list, so the term backlist
> > is misleading.
>
> So this matching function gets both blacklists and whitelists. No
> wonder it is confusing. Now I finally understand what you wanna do:
> you want to call all those lists something agnostic as platform_list
> or so because they contain exactly that: platforms - not OEMs.
Right.
> And then you want to match *platforms*. *Not* OEMs.
True, there is some stretch to use OEMIDs for detecting platforms. But
we do not have other standard interfaces better than this one.
> *Now* I understand what you're trying to tell me.
:-)
Thanks,
-Toshi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [1/3] ACPI / blacklist: add acpi_match_oemlist() interface
@ 2017-07-18 18:49 Toshi Kani
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Toshi Kani @ 2017-07-18 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bp@alien8.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mchehab@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com, lenb@kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org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---
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-edac" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [1/3] ACPI / blacklist: add acpi_match_oemlist() interface
@ 2017-07-18 17:42 Borislav Petkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2017-07-18 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kani, Toshimitsu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mchehab@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com, lenb@kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 05:24:50PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> Well, a list does not need to be a black-list.
But this one *is* a blacklist.
> So, I tried to avoid putting any usage to the structure name.
So OEM is a usage. The moment you need to use it for something else
besides an OEM, it is not an OEM list anymore - it is a generic
blacklist which blacklists OEMs too.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [1/3] ACPI / blacklist: add acpi_match_oemlist() interface
@ 2017-07-18 17:24 Toshi Kani
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Toshi Kani @ 2017-07-18 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bp@alien8.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mchehab@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com, lenb@kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org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---
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-edac" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [1/3] ACPI / blacklist: add acpi_match_oemlist() interface
@ 2017-07-18 16:43 Borislav Petkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2017-07-18 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kani, Toshimitsu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mchehab@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com, lenb@kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 03:48:54PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> This patch defines 'struct acpi_oemlist' in "include/linux/acpi.h" as a
I see that.
> common structure, and replaces this specific 'struct acpi_blacklist'.
And what makes acpi_oemlist "common" and acpi_blacklist "specific"?
So let me save you some time - "oemlist" is more specific than
"blacklist" and I can imagine a blacklist item not always being
oem-specific.
What I'm hinting at is, don't change that name. acpi_blacklist is just
fine.
> Agreed. Will change to a shorter name like below.
>
> enum acpi_oemlist_pred predicate;
enum acpi_predicate pred;
is even better.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [1/3] ACPI / blacklist: add acpi_match_oemlist() interface
@ 2017-07-18 15:48 Toshi Kani
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Toshi Kani @ 2017-07-18 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bp@alien8.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mchehab@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com, lenb@kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 07:34 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 03:59:10PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > ACPI OEM ID / OEM Table ID / Revision can be used to identify
> > platform type based on ACPI firmware. acpi_blacklisted(),
> > intel_pstate_platform_pwr_mgmt_exists() and some other funcs
> > have been using this type of check to detect a list of platforms
> > that require special handlings.
> >
> > Move the platform type check in acpi_blacklisted() to a common
> > utility function, acpi_match_oemlist(), so that other drivers
> > do not have to implement their own.
> >
> > There is no change in functionality.
:
> > /*
> > * POLICY: If *anything* doesn't work, put it on the blacklist.
> > * If they are critical errors, mark it critical, and
> > abort driver load.
> > */
> > -static struct acpi_blacklist_item acpi_blacklist[] __initdata = {
> > +static struct acpi_oemlist acpi_blacklist[] __initdata = {
>
> Why the arbitrary rename?
This patch defines 'struct acpi_oemlist' in "include/linux/acpi.h" as a
common structure, and replaces this specific 'struct acpi_blacklist'.
> If anything, you should shorten that
>
> enum acpi_blacklist_predicates oem_revision_predicate;
>
> unreadable insanity.
Agreed. Will change to a shorter name like below.
enum acpi_oemlist_pred predicate;
+ i = acpi_match_oemlist(acpi_blacklist);
> > + if (i >= 0) {
> > + pr_err(PREFIX "Vendor \"%6.6s\" System \"%8.8s\" "
> > + "Revision 0x%x has a known ACPI BIOS
> > problem.\n",
>
> Put that string on a single line for grepping. checkpatch catches
> that error, didn't you see it?
Will do.
Thanks!
-Toshi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [1/3] ACPI / blacklist: add acpi_match_oemlist() interface
@ 2017-07-18 5:34 Borislav Petkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2017-07-18 5:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Toshi Kani
Cc: rjw, mchehab, tglx, srinivas.pandruvada, lenb, linux-acpi,
linux-edac, linux-kernel
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 03:59:10PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> ACPI OEM ID / OEM Table ID / Revision can be used to identify
> platform type based on ACPI firmware. acpi_blacklisted(),
> intel_pstate_platform_pwr_mgmt_exists() and some other funcs
> have been using this type of check to detect a list of platforms
> that require special handlings.
>
> Move the platform type check in acpi_blacklisted() to a common
> utility function, acpi_match_oemlist(), so that other drivers
> do not have to implement their own.
>
> There is no change in functionality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/blacklist.c | 84 ++++++++--------------------------------------
> drivers/acpi/utils.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/acpi.h | 19 ++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/blacklist.c b/drivers/acpi/blacklist.c
> index bb542ac..288fe4d 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/blacklist.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/blacklist.c
> @@ -30,30 +30,13 @@
>
> #include "internal.h"
>
> -enum acpi_blacklist_predicates {
> - all_versions,
> - less_than_or_equal,
> - equal,
> - greater_than_or_equal,
> -};
> -
> -struct acpi_blacklist_item {
> - char oem_id[7];
> - char oem_table_id[9];
> - u32 oem_revision;
> - char *table;
> - enum acpi_blacklist_predicates oem_revision_predicate;
> - char *reason;
> - u32 is_critical_error;
> -};
> -
> static struct dmi_system_id acpi_rev_dmi_table[] __initdata;
>
> /*
> * POLICY: If *anything* doesn't work, put it on the blacklist.
> * If they are critical errors, mark it critical, and abort driver load.
> */
> -static struct acpi_blacklist_item acpi_blacklist[] __initdata = {
> +static struct acpi_oemlist acpi_blacklist[] __initdata = {
Why the arbitrary rename?
If anything, you should shorten that
enum acpi_blacklist_predicates oem_revision_predicate;
unreadable insanity.
> /* Compaq Presario 1700 */
> {"PTLTD ", " DSDT ", 0x06040000, ACPI_SIG_DSDT, less_than_or_equal,
> "Multiple problems", 1},
> @@ -67,65 +50,28 @@ static struct acpi_blacklist_item acpi_blacklist[] __initdata = {
> {"IBM ", "TP600E ", 0x00000105, ACPI_SIG_DSDT, less_than_or_equal,
> "Incorrect _ADR", 1},
>
> - {""}
> + { }
> };
>
> int __init acpi_blacklisted(void)
> {
> - int i = 0;
> + int i;
> int blacklisted = 0;
> - struct acpi_table_header table_header;
> -
> - while (acpi_blacklist[i].oem_id[0] != '\0') {
> - if (acpi_get_table_header(acpi_blacklist[i].table, 0, &table_header)) {
> - i++;
> - continue;
> - }
> -
> - if (strncmp(acpi_blacklist[i].oem_id, table_header.oem_id, 6)) {
> - i++;
> - continue;
> - }
> -
> - if (strncmp
> - (acpi_blacklist[i].oem_table_id, table_header.oem_table_id,
> - 8)) {
> - i++;
> - continue;
> - }
> -
> - if ((acpi_blacklist[i].oem_revision_predicate == all_versions)
> - || (acpi_blacklist[i].oem_revision_predicate ==
> - less_than_or_equal
> - && table_header.oem_revision <=
> - acpi_blacklist[i].oem_revision)
> - || (acpi_blacklist[i].oem_revision_predicate ==
> - greater_than_or_equal
> - && table_header.oem_revision >=
> - acpi_blacklist[i].oem_revision)
> - || (acpi_blacklist[i].oem_revision_predicate == equal
> - && table_header.oem_revision ==
> - acpi_blacklist[i].oem_revision)) {
>
> - printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
> - "Vendor \"%6.6s\" System \"%8.8s\" "
> - "Revision 0x%x has a known ACPI BIOS problem.\n",
> - acpi_blacklist[i].oem_id,
> - acpi_blacklist[i].oem_table_id,
> - acpi_blacklist[i].oem_revision);
> + i = acpi_match_oemlist(acpi_blacklist);
> + if (i >= 0) {
> + pr_err(PREFIX "Vendor \"%6.6s\" System \"%8.8s\" "
> + "Revision 0x%x has a known ACPI BIOS problem.\n",
Put that string on a single line for grepping. checkpatch catches that
error, didn't you see it?
> + acpi_blacklist[i].oem_id,
> + acpi_blacklist[i].oem_table_id,
> + acpi_blacklist[i].oem_revision);
>
> - printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
> - "Reason: %s. This is a %s error\n",
> - acpi_blacklist[i].reason,
> - (acpi_blacklist[i].
> - is_critical_error ? "non-recoverable" :
> - "recoverable"));
> + pr_err(PREFIX "Reason: %s. This is a %s error\n",
> + acpi_blacklist[i].reason,
> + (acpi_blacklist[i].data ?
> + "non-recoverable" : "recoverable"));
>
> - blacklisted = acpi_blacklist[i].is_critical_error;
> - break;
> - } else {
> - i++;
> - }
> + blacklisted = acpi_blacklist[i].data;
> }
>
> (void)early_acpi_osi_init();
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [1/3] ACPI / blacklist: add acpi_match_oemlist() interface
@ 2017-07-17 21:59 Toshi Kani
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Toshi Kani @ 2017-07-17 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw, bp
Cc: mchehab, tglx, srinivas.pandruvada, lenb, linux-acpi, linux-edac,
linux-kernel, Toshi Kani
ACPI OEM ID / OEM Table ID / Revision can be used to identify
platform type based on ACPI firmware. acpi_blacklisted(),
intel_pstate_platform_pwr_mgmt_exists() and some other funcs
have been using this type of check to detect a list of platforms
that require special handlings.
Move the platform type check in acpi_blacklisted() to a common
utility function, acpi_match_oemlist(), so that other drivers
do not have to implement their own.
There is no change in functionality.
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
drivers/acpi/blacklist.c | 84 ++++++++--------------------------------------
drivers/acpi/utils.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/acpi.h | 19 ++++++++++
3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-edac" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/blacklist.c b/drivers/acpi/blacklist.c
index bb542ac..288fe4d 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/blacklist.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/blacklist.c
@@ -30,30 +30,13 @@
#include "internal.h"
-enum acpi_blacklist_predicates {
- all_versions,
- less_than_or_equal,
- equal,
- greater_than_or_equal,
-};
-
-struct acpi_blacklist_item {
- char oem_id[7];
- char oem_table_id[9];
- u32 oem_revision;
- char *table;
- enum acpi_blacklist_predicates oem_revision_predicate;
- char *reason;
- u32 is_critical_error;
-};
-
static struct dmi_system_id acpi_rev_dmi_table[] __initdata;
/*
* POLICY: If *anything* doesn't work, put it on the blacklist.
* If they are critical errors, mark it critical, and abort driver load.
*/
-static struct acpi_blacklist_item acpi_blacklist[] __initdata = {
+static struct acpi_oemlist acpi_blacklist[] __initdata = {
/* Compaq Presario 1700 */
{"PTLTD ", " DSDT ", 0x06040000, ACPI_SIG_DSDT, less_than_or_equal,
"Multiple problems", 1},
@@ -67,65 +50,28 @@ static struct acpi_blacklist_item acpi_blacklist[] __initdata = {
{"IBM ", "TP600E ", 0x00000105, ACPI_SIG_DSDT, less_than_or_equal,
"Incorrect _ADR", 1},
- {""}
+ { }
};
int __init acpi_blacklisted(void)
{
- int i = 0;
+ int i;
int blacklisted = 0;
- struct acpi_table_header table_header;
-
- while (acpi_blacklist[i].oem_id[0] != '\0') {
- if (acpi_get_table_header(acpi_blacklist[i].table, 0, &table_header)) {
- i++;
- continue;
- }
-
- if (strncmp(acpi_blacklist[i].oem_id, table_header.oem_id, 6)) {
- i++;
- continue;
- }
-
- if (strncmp
- (acpi_blacklist[i].oem_table_id, table_header.oem_table_id,
- 8)) {
- i++;
- continue;
- }
-
- if ((acpi_blacklist[i].oem_revision_predicate == all_versions)
- || (acpi_blacklist[i].oem_revision_predicate ==
- less_than_or_equal
- && table_header.oem_revision <=
- acpi_blacklist[i].oem_revision)
- || (acpi_blacklist[i].oem_revision_predicate ==
- greater_than_or_equal
- && table_header.oem_revision >=
- acpi_blacklist[i].oem_revision)
- || (acpi_blacklist[i].oem_revision_predicate == equal
- && table_header.oem_revision ==
- acpi_blacklist[i].oem_revision)) {
- printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
- "Vendor \"%6.6s\" System \"%8.8s\" "
- "Revision 0x%x has a known ACPI BIOS problem.\n",
- acpi_blacklist[i].oem_id,
- acpi_blacklist[i].oem_table_id,
- acpi_blacklist[i].oem_revision);
+ i = acpi_match_oemlist(acpi_blacklist);
+ if (i >= 0) {
+ pr_err(PREFIX "Vendor \"%6.6s\" System \"%8.8s\" "
+ "Revision 0x%x has a known ACPI BIOS problem.\n",
+ acpi_blacklist[i].oem_id,
+ acpi_blacklist[i].oem_table_id,
+ acpi_blacklist[i].oem_revision);
- printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
- "Reason: %s. This is a %s error\n",
- acpi_blacklist[i].reason,
- (acpi_blacklist[i].
- is_critical_error ? "non-recoverable" :
- "recoverable"));
+ pr_err(PREFIX "Reason: %s. This is a %s error\n",
+ acpi_blacklist[i].reason,
+ (acpi_blacklist[i].data ?
+ "non-recoverable" : "recoverable"));
- blacklisted = acpi_blacklist[i].is_critical_error;
- break;
- } else {
- i++;
- }
+ blacklisted = acpi_blacklist[i].data;
}
(void)early_acpi_osi_init();
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
index b9d956c..e5909d5 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/utils.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
@@ -816,3 +816,43 @@ static int __init acpi_backlight(char *str)
return 1;
}
__setup("acpi_backlight=", acpi_backlight);
+
+/**
+ * acpi_match_oemlist - Check if the system matches with an oem list
+ * @oem: pointer to acpi_oemlist table terminated by a NULL entry
+ *
+ * Return the matched index if the system is found in the oem list.
+ * Otherwise, return a negative error code.
+ */
+int acpi_match_oemlist(const struct acpi_oemlist *oem)
+{
+ struct acpi_table_header hdr;
+ int idx = 0;
+
+ if (acpi_disabled)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ for (; oem->oem_id[0]; oem++, idx++) {
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_table_header(oem->table, 0, &hdr)))
+ continue;
+
+ if (strncmp(oem->oem_id, hdr.oem_id, ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE))
+ continue;
+
+ if (strncmp(oem->oem_table_id, hdr.oem_table_id,
+ ACPI_OEM_TABLE_ID_SIZE))
+ continue;
+
+ if ((oem->oem_revision_predicate == all_versions) ||
+ (oem->oem_revision_predicate == less_than_or_equal
+ && hdr.oem_revision <= oem->oem_revision) ||
+ (oem->oem_revision_predicate == greater_than_or_equal
+ && hdr.oem_revision >= oem->oem_revision) ||
+ (oem->oem_revision_predicate == equal
+ && hdr.oem_revision == oem->oem_revision))
+ return idx;
+ }
+
+ return -ENODEV;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_match_oemlist);
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index c749eef..86479b5 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -556,6 +556,25 @@ extern acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_set(acpi_handle handle,
#define ACPI_OST_SC_DRIVER_LOAD_FAILURE 0x81
#define ACPI_OST_SC_INSERT_NOT_SUPPORTED 0x82
+enum acpi_oemlist_predicates {
+ all_versions,
+ less_than_or_equal,
+ equal,
+ greater_than_or_equal,
+};
+
+/* Table must be terminted by a NULL entry */
+struct acpi_oemlist {
+ char oem_id[ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE];
+ char oem_table_id[ACPI_OEM_TABLE_ID_SIZE];
+ u32 oem_revision;
+ char *table;
+ enum acpi_oemlist_predicates oem_revision_predicate;
+ char *reason;
+ u32 data;
+};
+int acpi_match_oemlist(const struct acpi_oemlist *oem);
+
extern void acpi_early_init(void);
extern void acpi_subsystem_init(void);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-07-18 20:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-07-18 19:32 [1/3] ACPI / blacklist: add acpi_match_oemlist() interface Borislav Petkov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-07-18 20:17 Toshi Kani
2017-07-18 18:49 Toshi Kani
2017-07-18 17:42 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-18 17:24 Toshi Kani
2017-07-18 16:43 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-18 15:48 Toshi Kani
2017-07-18 5:34 Borislav Petkov
2017-07-17 21:59 Toshi Kani
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox