From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Aristeu Rozanski <aris@redhat.com>,
linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [2/3] EDAC, sb_edac: Early return on ADDRV bit and address type test
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 14:07:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180904210759.3814-3-tony.luck@intel.com> (raw)
From: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
Current EDAC driver only decodes valid memory physical addresses.
So move the test for bit 58(ADDRV) into sbridge_mce_check_error(),
and add a test that the address is the right type (looking as MISC
bits{8:6}). Get rid of the duplicated test whether it's a memory
controller error in sbridge_mce_output_error().
Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
---
drivers/edac/sb_edac.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
index 07726fb00321..f3678cdada83 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
@@ -2911,35 +2911,27 @@ static void sbridge_mce_output_error(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
* cccc = channel
* If the mask doesn't match, report an error to the parsing logic
*/
- if (! ((errcode & 0xef80) == 0x80)) {
- optype = "Can't parse: it is not a mem";
- } else {
- switch (optypenum) {
- case 0:
- optype = "generic undef request error";
- break;
- case 1:
- optype = "memory read error";
- break;
- case 2:
- optype = "memory write error";
- break;
- case 3:
- optype = "addr/cmd error";
- break;
- case 4:
- optype = "memory scrubbing error";
- break;
- default:
- optype = "reserved";
- break;
- }
+ switch (optypenum) {
+ case 0:
+ optype = "generic undef request error";
+ break;
+ case 1:
+ optype = "memory read error";
+ break;
+ case 2:
+ optype = "memory write error";
+ break;
+ case 3:
+ optype = "addr/cmd error";
+ break;
+ case 4:
+ optype = "memory scrubbing error";
+ break;
+ default:
+ optype = "reserved";
+ break;
}
- /* Only decode errors with an valid address (ADDRV) */
- if (!GET_BITFIELD(m->status, 58, 58))
- return;
-
if (pvt->info.type == KNIGHTS_LANDING) {
if (channel == 14) {
edac_dbg(0, "%s%s err_code:%04x:%04x EDRAM bank %d\n",
@@ -3045,17 +3037,11 @@ static int sbridge_mce_check_error(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
{
struct mce *mce = (struct mce *)data;
struct mem_ctl_info *mci;
- struct sbridge_pvt *pvt;
char *type;
if (edac_get_report_status() == EDAC_REPORTING_DISABLED)
return NOTIFY_DONE;
- mci = get_mci_for_node_id(mce->socketid, IMC0);
- if (!mci)
- return NOTIFY_DONE;
- pvt = mci->pvt_info;
-
/*
* Just let mcelog handle it if the error is
* outside the memory controller. A memory error
@@ -3065,6 +3051,22 @@ static int sbridge_mce_check_error(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
if ((mce->status & 0xefff) >> 7 != 1)
return NOTIFY_DONE;
+ /* Check ADDRV bit in STATUS */
+ if (!GET_BITFIELD(mce->status, 58, 58))
+ return NOTIFY_DONE;
+
+ /* Check MISCV bit in STATUS */
+ if (!GET_BITFIELD(mce->status, 59, 59))
+ return NOTIFY_DONE;
+
+ /* Check address type in MISC (physical address only) */
+ if (GET_BITFIELD(mce->misc, 6, 8) != 2)
+ return NOTIFY_DONE;
+
+ mci = get_mci_for_node_id(mce->socketid, IMC0);
+ if (!mci)
+ return NOTIFY_DONE;
+
if (mce->mcgstatus & MCG_STATUS_MCIP)
type = "Exception";
else
next reply other threads:[~2018-09-04 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-04 21:07 Luck, Tony [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-09-05 14:01 [2/3] EDAC, sb_edac: Early return on ADDRV bit and address type test Borislav Petkov
2018-09-06 13:18 Qiuxu Zhuo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180904210759.3814-3-tony.luck@intel.com \
--to=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=aris@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox