Linux EDAC development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhaolong Zhang" <zhangzl2013@126.com>
To: "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: drop cpu_missing since we have more capable mce_missing_cpus
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 18:13:04 +0800 (CST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d526023.3cde.17cff097bab.Coremail.zhangzl2013@126.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YYjuiHN1wKt82fjs@zn.tnic>

At 2021-11-08 17:31:52, "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 04:28:32PM +0800, Zhaolong Zhang wrote:
>> move mce_missing_cpus checking into mce_panic() as well, because we don't want
>> to lose the cpu missing information in case mca_cfg.tolerant > 1 and there is
>> no_way_out.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Zhaolong Zhang <zhangzl2013@126.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
>I was actually expecting to see something like this:

Hi Boris,

I was concerning that if I simply remove the cpu_missing code, we will lose the log in the
situation where mca_cfg.tolerant > 1 and no_way_out is set afterwards.

Do you think we can safely ignore that situation?

Regards,
Zhaolong


>
>diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
>index 6ed365337a3b..30de00fe0d7a 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
>+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
>@@ -99,7 +99,6 @@ struct mca_config mca_cfg __read_mostly = {
> 
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct mce, mces_seen);
> static unsigned long mce_need_notify;
>-static int cpu_missing;
> 
> /*
>  * MCA banks polled by the period polling timer for corrected events.
>@@ -314,8 +313,6 @@ static void mce_panic(const char *msg, struct mce *final, char *exp)
> 		if (!apei_err)
> 			apei_err = apei_write_mce(final);
> 	}
>-	if (cpu_missing)
>-		pr_emerg(HW_ERR "Some CPUs didn't answer in synchronization\n");
> 	if (exp)
> 		pr_emerg(HW_ERR "Machine check: %s\n", exp);
> 	if (!fake_panic) {
>@@ -891,7 +888,6 @@ static int mce_timed_out(u64 *t, const char *msg)
> 					 cpumask_pr_args(&mce_missing_cpus));
> 			mce_panic(msg, NULL, NULL);
> 		}
>-		cpu_missing = 1;
> 		return 1;
> 	}
> 	*t -= SPINUNIT;
>@@ -2702,7 +2698,6 @@ struct dentry *mce_get_debugfs_dir(void)
> 
> static void mce_reset(void)
> {
>-	cpu_missing = 0;
> 	atomic_set(&mce_fake_panicked, 0);
> 	atomic_set(&mce_executing, 0);
> 	atomic_set(&mce_callin, 0);
>
>-- 
>Regards/Gruss,
>    Boris.
>
>https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-08 10:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-04  7:44 [PATCH] x86/mce: correct cpu_missing reporting in mce_timed_out Zhaolong Zhang
2021-11-04  9:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-11-04 15:47   ` Luck, Tony
2021-11-04 18:02     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-11-05  2:19       ` Zhaolong Zhang
2021-11-08  8:28         ` [PATCH] x86/mce: drop cpu_missing since we have more capable mce_missing_cpus Zhaolong Zhang
2021-11-08  9:31           ` Borislav Petkov
2021-11-08 10:13             ` Zhaolong Zhang [this message]
2021-11-08 10:31               ` Borislav Petkov
2021-11-08 12:47                 ` Zhaolong Zhang
2021-11-09  8:31                   ` Zhaolong Zhang
2021-11-09  8:35                     ` [PATCH] x86/mce: Get rid of cpu_missing Zhaolong Zhang
2021-11-09  9:15                       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-11-09 14:19                         ` Zhaolong Zhang
2021-11-09  9:07                     ` [PATCH] x86/mce: drop cpu_missing since we have more capable mce_missing_cpus Borislav Petkov
2021-11-09 16:06                       ` Luck, Tony
2021-11-09 19:48                         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-11-09 19:50                           ` Luck, Tony
2021-11-09 20:21                             ` Borislav Petkov
2021-11-09 20:44                               ` Luck, Tony
2021-11-09 21:30                                 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-20 20:43                                   ` [PATCH] x86/mce: Remove the tolerance level control Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4d526023.3cde.17cff097bab.Coremail.zhangzl2013@126.com \
    --to=zhangzl2013@126.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox