From: "Zhaolong Zhang" <zhangzl2013@126.com>
To: "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: correct cpu_missing reporting in mce_timed_out
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 10:19:27 +0800 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <572d793c.f2e.17cede4cbf0.Coremail.zhangzl2013@126.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YYQgPGVxP0R9hfYx@zn.tnic>
At 2021-11-05 02:02:36, "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 03:47:36PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
>> > Frankly, we might just as well kill that cpu_missing thing because we
>> > already say that some CPUs are not responding.
>>
>> Yes. The more recent commit:
>>
>> 7bb39313cd62 ("x86/mce: Make mce_timed_out() identify holdout CPUs")
>>
>> tries to provide the more detailed message about *which* CPUs are missing
>
>Exactly.
>
>> I think cpu_missing can be dropped.
>
>Zhaolong, you could send a patch doing that, instead.
Thanks for the reply. Let me see how to do it properly.
Regards,
Zhaolong
>
>Thx.
>
>--
>Regards/Gruss,
> Boris.
>
>https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-05 2:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-04 7:44 [PATCH] x86/mce: correct cpu_missing reporting in mce_timed_out Zhaolong Zhang
2021-11-04 9:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-11-04 15:47 ` Luck, Tony
2021-11-04 18:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-11-05 2:19 ` Zhaolong Zhang [this message]
2021-11-08 8:28 ` [PATCH] x86/mce: drop cpu_missing since we have more capable mce_missing_cpus Zhaolong Zhang
2021-11-08 9:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-11-08 10:13 ` Zhaolong Zhang
2021-11-08 10:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-11-08 12:47 ` Zhaolong Zhang
2021-11-09 8:31 ` Zhaolong Zhang
2021-11-09 8:35 ` [PATCH] x86/mce: Get rid of cpu_missing Zhaolong Zhang
2021-11-09 9:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-11-09 14:19 ` Zhaolong Zhang
2021-11-09 9:07 ` [PATCH] x86/mce: drop cpu_missing since we have more capable mce_missing_cpus Borislav Petkov
2021-11-09 16:06 ` Luck, Tony
2021-11-09 19:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-11-09 19:50 ` Luck, Tony
2021-11-09 20:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-11-09 20:44 ` Luck, Tony
2021-11-09 21:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-20 20:43 ` [PATCH] x86/mce: Remove the tolerance level control Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=572d793c.f2e.17cede4cbf0.Coremail.zhangzl2013@126.com \
--to=zhangzl2013@126.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox