[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 21/43] erofs: reliably distinguish block based and fscache mode

[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 21/43] erofs: reliably distinguish block based and fscache mode

[Sasha Levin]

From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 7af2ae1b1531feab5d38ec9c8f472dc6cceb4606 ]

When erofs_kill_sb() is called in block dev based mode, s_bdev may not
have been initialised yet, and if CONFIG_EROFS_FS_ONDEMAND is enabled,
it will be mistaken for fscache mode, and then attempt to free an anon_dev
that has never been allocated, triggering the following warning:

============================================
ida_free called for id=0 which is not allocated.
WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 926 at lib/idr.c:525 ida_free+0x134/0x140
Modules linked in:
CPU: 14 PID: 926 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.9.0-rc3-dirty #630
RIP: 0010:ida_free+0x134/0x140
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 erofs_kill_sb+0x81/0x90
 deactivate_locked_super+0x35/0x80
 get_tree_bdev+0x136/0x1e0
 vfs_get_tree+0x2c/0xf0
 do_new_mount+0x190/0x2f0
 [...]
============================================

Now when erofs_kill_sb() is called, erofs_sb_info must have been
initialised, so use sbi->fsid to distinguish between the two modes.

Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240419123611.947084-3-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/erofs/super.c | 8 ++------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/erofs/super.c b/fs/erofs/super.c
index c9f9a43197db6..6a785b95121f1 100644
--- a/fs/erofs/super.c
+++ b/fs/erofs/super.c
@@ -796,17 +796,13 @@ static int erofs_init_fs_context(struct fs_context *fc)
 
 static void erofs_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb)
 {
-	struct erofs_sb_info *sbi;
+	struct erofs_sb_info *sbi = EROFS_SB(sb);
 
-	if (erofs_is_fscache_mode(sb))
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EROFS_FS_ONDEMAND) && sbi->fsid)
 		kill_anon_super(sb);
 	else
 		kill_block_super(sb);
 
-	sbi = EROFS_SB(sb);
-	if (!sbi)
-		return;
-
 	erofs_free_dev_context(sbi->devs);
 	fs_put_dax(sbi->dax_dev, NULL);
 	erofs_fscache_unregister_fs(sb);
-- 
2.43.0

Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 21/43] erofs: reliably distinguish block based and fscache mode

[Gao Xiang]

Hi,

On 2024/5/8 07:09, Sasha Levin wrote:
> From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
> 
> [ Upstream commit 7af2ae1b1531feab5d38ec9c8f472dc6cceb4606 ]
> 
> When erofs_kill_sb() is called in block dev based mode, s_bdev may not
> have been initialised yet, and if CONFIG_EROFS_FS_ONDEMAND is enabled,
> it will be mistaken for fscache mode, and then attempt to free an anon_dev
> that has never been allocated, triggering the following warning:
> 
> ============================================
> ida_free called for id=0 which is not allocated.
> WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 926 at lib/idr.c:525 ida_free+0x134/0x140
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 14 PID: 926 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.9.0-rc3-dirty #630
> RIP: 0010:ida_free+0x134/0x140
> Call Trace:
>   <TASK>
>   erofs_kill_sb+0x81/0x90
>   deactivate_locked_super+0x35/0x80
>   get_tree_bdev+0x136/0x1e0
>   vfs_get_tree+0x2c/0xf0
>   do_new_mount+0x190/0x2f0
>   [...]
> ============================================
> 
> Now when erofs_kill_sb() is called, erofs_sb_info must have been
> initialised, so use sbi->fsid to distinguish between the two modes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240419123611.947084-3-libaokun1@huawei.com
> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

Please help drop this patch, you should backport the dependency
commit 07abe43a28b2 ("erofs: get rid of erofs_fs_context")

in advance.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang