Re: - disable-ext4.patch removed from -mm tree

[Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>]

On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 10:00 -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 07:15:40PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 20:36:26 -0500 Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 12:25:51PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > When I merge David's iget coversion patches this will instead wreck the
> > > > ext4 patchset.
> > > 
> > > That's ok, it shouldn't be hard for me to fix this up.  How quickly
> > > will you be able to merge David's iget converstion patches?
> > 
> > They're about 1,000 patches back.
> 
> OK, if you're not planning on pushing David's changes to Linus right
> away, what if I pull in David's
> 
> 	iget-stop-ext4-from-using-iget-and-read_inode-try.patch 
> 
> and push it plus some other ext4 bug fixes directly to Linus, and let
> you know when that has happened so you can drop David's patch from
> your queue?
> 
> David's changes to ext4 can be applied standalone without the rest of
> his series, so it would be safe to push that to Linus independently
> and in advance of the rest of his series.  

I get compile error when builing ext4 patch queue with
iget-stop-ext4-from-using-iget-and-read_inode-try.patch applied, against
2.6.24-git14.

It seems iget-stop-ext4-from-using-iget-and-read_inode-try.patch depends
on patches:  
[PATCH 01/31] Add an ERR_CAST() macro to complement ERR_PTR and co.
[PATCH 03/32] IGET: Introduce a function to register iget failure

Mingming

> That should also help
> reduce the number of inter-patch queue dependencies.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>        	       	      	      	  - Ted
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html