Re: Delayed allocation and page_lock vs transaction start ordering

[Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@gmail.com>]

On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 18:14 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>   I've ported my patch inversing locking ordering of page_lock and
> transaction start to ext4 (on top of ext4 patch queue). Everything except
> delayed allocation is converted (the patch is below for interested
> readers).

I am curious on the following code:

ext4_ordered_writepage()

+ * Note that we don't need to start a transaction unless we're journaling
+ * data because we should have holes filled from ext4_page_mkwrite(). If
+ * we are journaling data, we cannot start transaction directly because
+ * transaction start ranks above page lock so we have to do some magic...

Currently you are starting a transaction when the page is locked. 
What do you plan to do here ?

Thanks,
Badari