* Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH] 2/6 Detect overflows in loop counters
[not found] ` <44F5D66D.8030500@redhat.com>
@ 2006-08-30 22:25 ` Theodore Tso
2006-09-12 2:30 ` Comments on respun 16T patches: group_desc_loops Theodore Tso
2006-09-12 19:28 ` [Ext2-devel] [PATCH] 2/6 Detect overflows in loop counters Theodore Tso
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Theodore Tso @ 2006-08-30 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: linux-ext4
First post! (Note new mailing list)
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 01:18:21PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> I've respun & refactored the remaining patches against the mercurial
> repo, and put changelog entries in...
Thanks, I appreciate it!
- Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Comments on respun 16T patches: group_desc_loops
[not found] ` <44F5D66D.8030500@redhat.com>
2006-08-30 22:25 ` [Ext2-devel] [PATCH] 2/6 Detect overflows in loop counters Theodore Tso
@ 2006-09-12 2:30 ` Theodore Tso
2006-09-12 19:28 ` [Ext2-devel] [PATCH] 2/6 Detect overflows in loop counters Theodore Tso
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Theodore Tso @ 2006-09-12 2:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: linux-ext4
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 01:18:21PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> http://people.redhat.com/esandeen/ext3/e2fsprogs-1.39-16T/e2fsprogs-hg-20060830-16T-patches.tar.gz
In the group_desc_loops patches in the above tarball:
>For loops iterating over all group descriptors, consistently define
>first_block and last_block in a way that they are inclusive of the
>range, and do not overflow.
>
>Previously on the last block group we did a test of <= first + dec_blocks;
>this would actually wrap back to 0 for a total block count of 2^32-1
As far as I can tell this is not a problem. sb->s_last_block can be
at most 2**32-1 --- which means that the last valid block number is
actually 2**32-2, since block numbers are zero based.
So as long as the handling of the last block group is correct, I don't
think we actually need to make the <= to < change. It's not wrong to
make the change, just not necessary as far as I can see.
Also, there are some files for which the only change was variable
names. That's fine, but the changelogs should state that.
So there is a last block group handling bug in ext2fs_check_desc(),
but I didn't see any other bugs that this patch would actually affect.
Am I missing anything?
Regards,
- Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH] 2/6 Detect overflows in loop counters
[not found] ` <44F5D66D.8030500@redhat.com>
2006-08-30 22:25 ` [Ext2-devel] [PATCH] 2/6 Detect overflows in loop counters Theodore Tso
2006-09-12 2:30 ` Comments on respun 16T patches: group_desc_loops Theodore Tso
@ 2006-09-12 19:28 ` Theodore Tso
2006-09-12 19:38 ` Eric Sandeen
2 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Theodore Tso @ 2006-09-12 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: linux-ext4
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 01:18:21PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> new patchset & series is at
>
> http://people.redhat.com/esandeen/ext3/e2fsprogs-1.39-16T/e2fsprogs-hg-20060830-16T-patches.tar.gz
I've applied your patches (with a few minor changes in the
ChangeLogs), and committed them into Mercurial.
Regards,
- Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH] 2/6 Detect overflows in loop counters
2006-09-12 19:28 ` [Ext2-devel] [PATCH] 2/6 Detect overflows in loop counters Theodore Tso
@ 2006-09-12 19:38 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2006-09-12 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Theodore Tso; +Cc: linux-ext4
Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 01:18:21PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> new patchset & series is at
>>
>> http://people.redhat.com/esandeen/ext3/e2fsprogs-1.39-16T/e2fsprogs-hg-20060830-16T-patches.tar.gz
>
> I've applied your patches (with a few minor changes in the
> ChangeLogs), and committed them into Mercurial.
>
> Regards,
>
> - Ted
Thanks Ted!
There's one more lurking out there that I somehow neglected to put in
the above patchset, sent 08/16/2006, [Ext2-devel] [PATCH] fix size
calculation when mkfs is pointed at a regular file
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext2.devel/4703
Thanks,
-Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-09-12 19:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <44E3855D.5040303@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20060830061825.GB8046@thunk.org>
[not found] ` <44F5D66D.8030500@redhat.com>
2006-08-30 22:25 ` [Ext2-devel] [PATCH] 2/6 Detect overflows in loop counters Theodore Tso
2006-09-12 2:30 ` Comments on respun 16T patches: group_desc_loops Theodore Tso
2006-09-12 19:28 ` [Ext2-devel] [PATCH] 2/6 Detect overflows in loop counters Theodore Tso
2006-09-12 19:38 ` Eric Sandeen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox