public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_DIR_NLINK and the directory size.
@ 2008-02-12 12:36 Aneesh Kumar K.V
  2008-02-12 13:53 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V @ 2008-02-12 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andreas Dilger; +Cc: linux-ext4

Steps:
[root]# more /root/largedir 
i=65000
mkdir /mnt/tmp/test/
cd /mnt/tmp/test/
while [ $i -gt 0 ]
do 
        mkdir $i
        i=$(expr $i - 1)
done

# /root/largedir
# cd /mnt/tmp/test
# rm -rf *
# cd ..
# ls -al 
drwxr-xr-x  1 root root 1380352 Feb 12 07:15 test
# e2fsck -fv /dev/sda7
# ls -al 
drwxr-xr-x  2 root root 1380352 Feb 12 07:15 test


So e2fsck fix the link count. But the size is not updated. If i try to
run the script again, i get 

EXT4-fs error (device sda7): ext4_find_entry: reading directory #187681
offset 0
attempt to access beyond end of device
sda7: rw=32, want=17582522464, limit=19551042
attempt to access beyond end of device
sda7: rw=32, want=32620150800, limit=19551042
attempt to access beyond end of device
sda7: rw=32, want=32620150800, limit=19551042



Also after running fsstress fsck fails with zero size directory on
powerpc. I am finding directories with 

i_links_count == 1
i_blocks == 0

I missed to check whether the l_i_blocks_hi was having some value.

-aneesh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_DIR_NLINK and the directory size.
  2008-02-12 12:36 EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_DIR_NLINK and the directory size Aneesh Kumar K.V
@ 2008-02-12 13:53 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
  2008-02-12 15:05   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V @ 2008-02-12 13:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andreas Dilger; +Cc: linux-ext4

On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 06:06:32PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Also after running fsstress fsck fails with zero size directory on
> powerpc. I am finding directories with 
> 
> i_links_count == 1
> i_blocks == 0
> 
> I missed to check whether the l_i_blocks_hi was having some value.

Ok this is what i have in ext4_inode and super block

(gdb) p *inode
$1 = {i_mode = 16895, i_uid = 0, i_size = 4096, i_atime = 1202822535, i_ctime = 1202822535, i_mtime = 1202822535, i_dtime = 0,
i_gid = 0, i_links_count = 1, i_blocks = 0, i_flags = 524288, osd1 = {linux1 = {l_i_version = 1}, hurd1 = {h_i_translator = 1},
masix1 = {m_i_reserved1 = 1}}, i_block = {4077518848, 262144, 0 <repeats 13 times>}, i_generation = 2950864834, i_file_acl = 0,
i_dir_acl = 0, i_faddr = 0, osd2 = {linux2 = {l_i_blocks_hi = 0, i_pad1 = 0, l_i_uid_high = 0, l_i_gid_high = 0, l_i_reserved2 = 0},
hurd2 = {h_i_frag = 0 '\0', h_i_fsize = 0 '\0', h_i_mode_high = 0, h_i_uid_high = 0, h_i_gid_high = 0, h_i_author = 0}, masix2 = {
m_i_frag = 0 '\0', m_i_fsize = 0 '\0', m_pad1 = 0, m_i_reserved2 = {0, 0}}}}



(gdb) p *(struct ext2_super_block *)0x10081088
$3 = {s_inodes_count = 612000, s_blocks_count = 2443880, s_r_blocks_count = 122194, s_free_blocks_count = 2367290, 
  s_free_inodes_count = 597740, s_first_data_block = 0, s_log_block_size = 2, s_log_frag_size = 2, s_blocks_per_group = 32768, 
  s_frags_per_group = 32768, s_inodes_per_group = 8160, s_mtime = 1202819872, s_wtime = 1202822940, s_mnt_count = 1, 
  s_max_mnt_count = 31, s_magic = 61267, s_state = 1, s_errors = 1, s_minor_rev_level = 0, s_lastcheck = 1202819860, 
  s_checkinterval = 15552000, s_creator_os = 0, s_rev_level = 1, s_def_resuid = 0, s_def_resgid = 0, s_first_ino = 11, 
  s_inode_size = 256, s_block_group_nr = 0, s_feature_compat = 60, s_feature_incompat = 66, s_feature_ro_compat = 3, 
  s_uuid = "\017�K\n�\027@\211\2106\210Q\006���", s_volume_name = '\0' <repeats 15 times>, s_last_mounted = '\0' <repeats 63 times>, 
  s_algorithm_usage_bitmap = 0, s_prealloc_blocks = 0 '\0', s_prealloc_dir_blocks = 0 '\0', s_reserved_gdt_blocks = 596, 
  s_journal_uuid = '\0' <repeats 15 times>, s_journal_inum = 8, s_journal_dev = 0, s_last_orphan = 0, s_hash_seed = {3431749423, 
    287196506, 2183301643, 2777289977}, s_def_hash_version = 2 '\002', s_jnl_backup_type = 1 '\001', s_desc_size = 0, 
  s_default_mount_opts = 0, s_first_meta_bg = 0, s_mkfs_time = 1202819860, s_jnl_blocks = {1116, 1117, 1118, 1119, 1120, 1121, 1122, 
    1123, 1124, 1125, 1126, 1127, 1128, 2153, 0, 0, 134217728}, s_blocks_count_hi = 0, s_r_blocks_count_hi = 0, s_free_blocks_hi = 0, 
  s_min_extra_isize = 0, s_want_extra_isize = 0, s_flags = 6, s_raid_stride = 0, s_mmp_update_interval = 0, s_mmp_block = 0, 
  s_raid_stripe_width = 0, s_reserve

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_DIR_NLINK and the directory size.
  2008-02-12 13:53 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
@ 2008-02-12 15:05   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
  2008-02-12 22:56     ` Andreas Dilger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V @ 2008-02-12 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andreas Dilger; +Cc: linux-ext4

On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 07:23:42PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 06:06:32PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > Also after running fsstress fsck fails with zero size directory on
> > powerpc. I am finding directories with 
> > 
> > i_links_count == 1
> > i_blocks == 0
> > 
> > I missed to check whether the l_i_blocks_hi was having some value.
> 
> Ok this is what i have in ext4_inode and super block
> 
> (gdb) p *inode
> $1 = {i_mode = 16895, i_uid = 0, i_size = 4096, i_atime = 1202822535, i_ctime = 1202822535, i_mtime = 1202822535, i_dtime = 0,
> i_gid = 0, i_links_count = 1, i_blocks = 0, i_flags = 524288, osd1 = {linux1 = {l_i_version = 1}, hurd1 = {h_i_translator = 1},
> masix1 = {m_i_reserved1 = 1}}, i_block = {4077518848, 262144, 0 <repeats 13 times>}, i_generation = 2950864834, i_file_acl = 0,
> i_dir_acl = 0, i_faddr = 0, osd2 = {linux2 = {l_i_blocks_hi = 0, i_pad1 = 0, l_i_uid_high = 0, l_i_gid_high = 0, l_i_reserved2 = 0},
> hurd2 = {h_i_frag = 0 '\0', h_i_fsize = 0 '\0', h_i_mode_high = 0, h_i_uid_high = 0, h_i_gid_high = 0, h_i_author = 0}, masix2 = {
> m_i_frag = 0 '\0', m_i_fsize = 0 '\0', m_pad1 = 0, m_i_reserved2 = {0, 0}}}}
> 
> 
> 
> (gdb) p *(struct ext2_super_block *)0x10081088
> $3 = {s_inodes_count = 612000, s_blocks_count = 2443880, s_r_blocks_count = 122194, s_free_blocks_count = 2367290, 
>   s_free_inodes_count = 597740, s_first_data_block = 0, s_log_block_size = 2, s_log_frag_size = 2, s_blocks_per_group = 32768, 
>   s_frags_per_group = 32768, s_inodes_per_group = 8160, s_mtime = 1202819872, s_wtime = 1202822940, s_mnt_count = 1, 
>   s_max_mnt_count = 31, s_magic = 61267, s_state = 1, s_errors = 1, s_minor_rev_level = 0, s_lastcheck = 1202819860, 
>   s_checkinterval = 15552000, s_creator_os = 0, s_rev_level = 1, s_def_resuid = 0, s_def_resgid = 0, s_first_ino = 11, 
>   s_inode_size = 256, s_block_group_nr = 0, s_feature_compat = 60, s_feature_incompat = 66, s_feature_ro_compat = 3, 
>   s_uuid = "\017�K\n�\027@\211\2106\210Q\006���", s_volume_name = '\0' <repeats 15 times>, s_last_mounted = '\0' <repeats 63 times>, 
>   s_algorithm_usage_bitmap = 0, s_prealloc_blocks = 0 '\0', s_prealloc_dir_blocks = 0 '\0', s_reserved_gdt_blocks = 596, 
>   s_journal_uuid = '\0' <repeats 15 times>, s_journal_inum = 8, s_journal_dev = 0, s_last_orphan = 0, s_hash_seed = {3431749423, 
>     287196506, 2183301643, 2777289977}, s_def_hash_version = 2 '\002', s_jnl_backup_type = 1 '\001', s_desc_size = 0, 
>   s_default_mount_opts = 0, s_first_meta_bg = 0, s_mkfs_time = 1202819860, s_jnl_blocks = {1116, 1117, 1118, 1119, 1120, 1121, 1122, 
>     1123, 1124, 1125, 1126, 1127, 1128, 2153, 0, 0, 134217728}, s_blocks_count_hi = 0, s_r_blocks_count_hi = 0, s_free_blocks_hi = 0, 
>   s_min_extra_isize = 0, s_want_extra_isize = 0, s_flags = 6, s_raid_stride = 0, s_mmp_update_interval = 0, s_mmp_block = 0, 
>   s_raid_stripe_width = 0, s_reserve
> -

Right now waiting for the test to finish with this change.

diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c
index a9347fb..fd3b031 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/namei.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c
@@ -1805,7 +1805,7 @@ retry:
 	inode->i_size = EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize;
 	dir_block = ext4_bread (handle, inode, 0, 1, &err);
 	if (!dir_block) {
-		ext4_dec_count(handle, inode); /* is this nlink == 0? */
+		drop_nlink(inode);
 		ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle, inode);
 		iput (inode);
 		goto out_stop;

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_DIR_NLINK and the directory size.
  2008-02-12 15:05   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
@ 2008-02-12 22:56     ` Andreas Dilger
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Dilger @ 2008-02-12 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Aneesh Kumar K.V; +Cc: linux-ext4

On Feb 12, 2008  20:35 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 07:23:42PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 06:06:32PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > > Also after running fsstress fsck fails with zero size directory on
> > > powerpc. I am finding directories with 
> > > 
> > > i_links_count == 1
> > > i_blocks == 0

Is this after some failure to create a subdirectory (e.g. ENOSPC)?

> > (gdb) p *inode
> > $1 = {i_mode = 16895, i_uid = 0, i_size = 4096, i_atime = 1202822535, i_ctime = 1202822535, i_mtime = 1202822535, i_dtime = 0,
> > i_gid = 0, i_links_count = 1, i_blocks = 0, i_flags = 524288, osd1 = {linux1 = {l_i_version = 1}, hurd1 = {h_i_translator = 1},
> > masix1 = {m_i_reserved1 = 1}}, i_block = {4077518848, 262144, 0 <repeats 13 times>}, i_generation = 2950864834, i_file_acl = 0,
> > i_dir_acl = 0, i_faddr = 0, osd2 = {linux2 = {l_i_blocks_hi = 0, i_pad1 = 0, l_i_uid_high = 0, l_i_gid_high = 0, l_i_reserved2 = 0},
> > hurd2 = {h_i_frag = 0 '\0', h_i_fsize = 0 '\0', h_i_mode_high = 0, h_i_uid_high = 0, h_i_gid_high = 0, h_i_author = 0}, masix2 = {
> > m_i_frag = 0 '\0', m_i_fsize = 0 '\0', m_pad1 = 0, m_i_reserved2 = {0, 0}}}}

This is the subdirectory inode?  The i_block values are the extent magic,
and i_flags = EXTENT_FL it appears (which is fine).

> Right now waiting for the test to finish with this change.
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c
> index a9347fb..fd3b031 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c
> @@ -1805,7 +1805,7 @@ retry:
>  	inode->i_size = EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize;
>  	dir_block = ext4_bread (handle, inode, 0, 1, &err);
>  	if (!dir_block) {
> -		ext4_dec_count(handle, inode); /* is this nlink == 0? */
> +		drop_nlink(inode);
>  		ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle, inode);
>  		iput (inode);
>  		goto out_stop;

It's entirely possible this is the right fix.  The code was changed for
all directory inodes replacing drop_nlink() (or its predecessor) with
ext4_dec_count().  In most cases this is correct, but it seems here it
isn't very clear (even with the useless comment) that the intention is
to drop the nlinks to 0 for the new directory inode.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-12 22:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-02-12 12:36 EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_DIR_NLINK and the directory size Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-02-12 13:53 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-02-12 15:05   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-02-12 22:56     ` Andreas Dilger

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox