From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>,
tytso@mit.edu, sandeen@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ext4: Fix the locking with respect to ext3 to ext4 migrate.
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:56:29 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080312085629.GR5851@webber.adilger.int> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080311165859.GA6490@skywalker>
On Mar 11, 2008 22:28 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 04:25:37PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > I agree here. IMHO the better option would be to just build the
> > extent-tree for converted inode on best-effort basis. If we find in
> > the end that someone has allocated new block to the file (via mmap
> > filling a hole) while we are converting, we can just cancel the
> > conversion. Because I think the cost of extra rwsem (both in terms of
> > additional memory needed for each inode structure and in time needed for
> > rwsem acquisitions) is more than I as a user would like to bear given
> > how rare the conversion is.
>
> Something like the below ??
>
> down_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
> + /* check for number of blocks */
> + if (total_blocks != inode->i_blocks) {
> + retval = -EAGAIN;
> + up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
> + goto err_out;
Is this enough, or should we use the inode version instead?
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-12 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-07 10:53 [RFC PATCH] ext4: Fix the locking with respect to ext3 to ext4 migrate Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-03-07 11:17 ` Mingming Cao
2008-03-07 11:31 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-03-07 23:47 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-03-11 15:25 ` Jan Kara
2008-03-11 16:58 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-03-12 8:56 ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2008-03-12 9:08 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-03-12 11:19 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080312085629.GR5851@webber.adilger.int \
--to=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox