public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>,
	tytso@mit.edu, sandeen@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ext4: Fix the locking with respect to ext3 to ext4 migrate.
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:38:11 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080312090811.GA9511@skywalker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080312085629.GR5851@webber.adilger.int>

On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 02:56:29AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Mar 11, 2008  22:28 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 04:25:37PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > >   I agree here. IMHO the better option would be to just build the
> > > extent-tree for converted inode on best-effort basis. If we find in
> > > the end that someone has allocated new block to the file (via mmap
> > > filling a hole) while we are converting, we can just cancel the
> > > conversion. Because I think the cost of extra rwsem (both in terms of
> > > additional memory needed for each inode structure and in time needed for
> > > rwsem acquisitions) is more than I as a user would like to bear given
> > > how rare the conversion is.
> >
> > Something like the below ??
> >
> >  	down_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
> > +	/* check for number of blocks */
> > +	if (total_blocks  != inode->i_blocks) {
> > +		retval = -EAGAIN;
> > +		up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
> > +		goto err_out;
> 
> Is this enough, or should we use the inode version instead

We are already holding inode->i_mutex. So the only possible operation is
adding new blocks via mmap write to holes. Also inode version is tricky
because it is available only with i_version mount option. We are also
interested only in new blocks added event.


-aneesh

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-12  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-07 10:53 [RFC PATCH] ext4: Fix the locking with respect to ext3 to ext4 migrate Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-03-07 11:17 ` Mingming Cao
2008-03-07 11:31   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-03-07 23:47     ` Andreas Dilger
2008-03-11 15:25       ` Jan Kara
2008-03-11 16:58         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-03-12  8:56           ` Andreas Dilger
2008-03-12  9:08             ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2008-03-12 11:19           ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080312090811.GA9511@skywalker \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=adilger@sun.com \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox