public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Fix delalloc sync hang with journal lock inversion
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 15:29:56 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080602095956.GB9225@skywalker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080602093459.GC30613@duck.suse.cz>

On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 11:35:00AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > @@ -1052,6 +1051,7 @@ static int __mpage_da_writepage(struct page *page,
> >  		head = page_buffers(page);
> >  		bh = head;
> >  		do {
> > +
>   I guess this line is a typo.
> 

Yes, Mostly some debug lines I removed, but missed the newline added.


> >  			BUG_ON(buffer_locked(bh));
> >  			if (buffer_dirty(bh))
> >  				mpage_add_bh_to_extent(mpd, logical, bh);
> > diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> > index 789b6ad..655b8bf 100644
> > --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> > +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> > @@ -881,7 +881,12 @@ int write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> >  	pagevec_init(&pvec, 0);
> >  	if (wbc->range_cyclic) {
> >  		index = mapping->writeback_index; /* Start from prev offset */
> > -		end = -1;
> > +		/*
> > +		 * write only till the specified range_end even in cyclic mode
> > +		 */
> > +		end = wbc->range_end >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> > +		if (!end)
> > +			end = -1;
> >  	} else {
> >  		index = wbc->range_start >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> >  		end = wbc->range_end >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
>   Are you sure you won't break other users of range_cyclic with this
> change?
>

I haven't run any specific test to verify that. The concern was that if
we force cyclic mode for writeout in delalloc we may be starting the
writeout from a different offset than specified and would be writing
more. So the changes was to use the offset specified. A quick look at
the kernel suggested most of them had range_end as 0 with cyclic_mode.
I haven't audited the full kernel. I will do that. Meanwhile if you
think it is risky to make this changes i guess we should drop this
part. But i guess we can keep the below change

+       index =  mapping->writeback_index;
+       if (!range_cyclic) {
+               /*
+                * We force cyclic write out of pages. If the
+                * caller didn't request for range_cyclic update
+                * set the writeback_index to what the caller requested.
+                */
+               mapping->writeback_index = wbc->range_start >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
+       }


-aneesh

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-02 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-30 13:39 [PATCH -v2] delalloc and journal locking order inversion fixes Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-05-30 13:39 ` [PATCH] ext4: Use page_mkwrite vma_operations to get mmap write notification Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-05-30 13:39   ` [PATCH] ext4: Inverse locking order of page_lock and transaction start Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-05-30 13:39     ` [PATCH] vfs: Move mark_inode_dirty() from under page lock in generic_write_end() Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-05-30 13:39       ` [PATCH] ext4: Add validation to jbd lock inversion patch and split and writepage Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-05-30 13:39         ` [PATCH] ext4: inverse locking ordering of page_lock and transaction start in delalloc Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-05-30 13:39           ` [PATCH] ext4: Fix delalloc sync hang with journal lock inversion Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-02  9:35             ` Jan Kara
2008-06-02  9:59               ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2008-06-02 10:27                 ` Jan Kara
2008-06-05 13:54                   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-05 16:22                     ` Jan Kara
2008-06-05 19:19                       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-11 12:41                         ` Jan Kara
2008-06-11 13:56                           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-11 17:48                             ` Jan Kara
2008-06-12 23:10                             ` Mingming Cao
2008-06-02  9:31         ` [PATCH] ext4: Add validation to jbd lock inversion patch and split and writepage Jan Kara
2008-06-02  9:52           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-02 10:40             ` Jan Kara
2008-05-30 17:51 ` [PATCH -v2] delalloc and journal locking order inversion fixes Mingming
2008-06-01 21:10 ` [PATCH] ext4: Need clear buffer_delay after page writeout for delayed allocation Mingming Cao
2008-06-02  3:14   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-02  3:50     ` Mingming Cao
2008-06-02  4:09       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-02  5:38         ` Mingming Cao
2008-06-02  6:35           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-02  7:04             ` Mingming Cao
2008-06-02  8:05               ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-03  4:43                 ` Mingming Cao
2008-06-03 10:07                   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-06-06 18:24 Patches for the patchqueue Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-06 18:24 ` [PATCH] ext4: cleanup blockallocator Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-06 18:24   ` [PATCH] ext2: Use page_mkwrite vma_operations to get mmap write notification Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-06 18:24     ` [PATCH] ext3: " Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-06 18:24       ` [PATCH] vfs: Don't flush delay buffer to disk Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-06 18:24         ` [PATCH] mm: Add range_cont mode for writeback Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-06 18:24           ` [PATCH] ext4: Fix delalloc sync hang with journal lock inversion Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-05-21 17:44 delalloc and journal locking order inversion fixes Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-05-21 17:44 ` [PATCH] ext4: Add validation to jbd lock inversion patch and split and writepage Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-05-21 17:44   ` [PATCH] ext4: inverse locking ordering of page_lock and transaction start in delalloc Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-05-21 17:44     ` [PATCH] ext4: Fix delalloc sync hang with journal lock inversion Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-05-22 10:25       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-05-22 17:58         ` Mingming
2008-05-22 18:23           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-05-22 19:45             ` Mingming
2008-05-22 18:10       ` Mingming
2008-05-22 18:26         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-05-22 19:26           ` Mingming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080602095956.GB9225@skywalker \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox