From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Cc: jack@suse.cz, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Need clear buffer_delay after page writeout for delayed allocation
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 15:37:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080603100734.GB16102@skywalker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1212468198.3636.116.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 09:43:18PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> >
> > Buffer marked as delay is also mapped
> > fs/ext4/inode.c
> >
> > 1437 map_bh(bh_result, inode->i_sb, 0);
> > 1438 set_buffer_new(bh_result);
> > 1439 set_buffer_delay(bh_result);
> >
> >
> I find a better place to handle this, it make sense to clear this bit in
> block_write_full_page() after get_block() returns successfully. This
> handles partial error case smoothly. Updated patch below (to replace the
> original patch)
>
> ext4: Need clear buffer_delay in block_write_full_page() after allocation
>
> From: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
>
> Normally delayed buffer could be cleared in mpage_da_map_blocks(), after
> blocks are successfully allocated. But if allocation failed, it will
> keep buffer_delay marked and deferring to later
> ext4_da_writepage()(via block_write_full_page()) to do block allocation.
> This patch handles clear bh delay bit in this case. Clear buffer_delay
> in block_write_full_page() after the block is allocated.
>
> This patch also fixed a bug in block_write_full_page() error case, we need
> to check the delayed flag before flush bh to disk when trying to recover from
> error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
>
> ---
> fs/buffer.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.26-rc4/fs/buffer.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.26-rc4.orig/fs/buffer.c 2008-06-02 21:34:30.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.26-rc4/fs/buffer.c 2008-06-02 21:35:17.000000000 -0700
> @@ -1697,6 +1697,7 @@ static int __block_write_full_page(struc
> err = get_block(inode, block, bh, 1);
> if (err)
> goto recover;
> + clear_buffer_delay(bh);
I still think we should clear the buffer_head delay bit in the get_block
rather than the callers. That way all the callers will be returned the
buffer_head with delay bit cleared. We do that for mapped and new bit
already.
> if (buffer_new(bh)) {
> /* blockdev mappings never come here */
> clear_buffer_new(bh);
> @@ -1775,7 +1776,8 @@ recover:
> bh = head;
> /* Recovery: lock and submit the mapped buffers */
> do {
> - if (buffer_mapped(bh) && buffer_dirty(bh)) {
> + if (buffer_mapped(bh) && buffer_dirty(bh)
> + && !buffer_delay(bh)) {
> lock_buffer(bh);
> mark_buffer_async_write(bh);
> } else {
>
>
This should be a separate bug fix patch. If we fail the allocation of a
block marked delay we should not write it.
-aneesh
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-03 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-30 13:39 [PATCH -v2] delalloc and journal locking order inversion fixes Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-05-30 13:39 ` [PATCH] ext4: Use page_mkwrite vma_operations to get mmap write notification Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-05-30 13:39 ` [PATCH] ext4: Inverse locking order of page_lock and transaction start Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-05-30 13:39 ` [PATCH] vfs: Move mark_inode_dirty() from under page lock in generic_write_end() Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-05-30 13:39 ` [PATCH] ext4: Add validation to jbd lock inversion patch and split and writepage Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-05-30 13:39 ` [PATCH] ext4: inverse locking ordering of page_lock and transaction start in delalloc Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-05-30 13:39 ` [PATCH] ext4: Fix delalloc sync hang with journal lock inversion Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-02 9:35 ` Jan Kara
2008-06-02 9:59 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-02 10:27 ` Jan Kara
2008-06-05 13:54 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-05 16:22 ` Jan Kara
2008-06-05 19:19 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-11 12:41 ` Jan Kara
2008-06-11 13:56 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-11 17:48 ` Jan Kara
2008-06-12 23:10 ` Mingming Cao
2008-06-02 9:31 ` [PATCH] ext4: Add validation to jbd lock inversion patch and split and writepage Jan Kara
2008-06-02 9:52 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-02 10:40 ` Jan Kara
2008-05-30 17:51 ` [PATCH -v2] delalloc and journal locking order inversion fixes Mingming
2008-06-01 21:10 ` [PATCH] ext4: Need clear buffer_delay after page writeout for delayed allocation Mingming Cao
2008-06-02 3:14 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-02 3:50 ` Mingming Cao
2008-06-02 4:09 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-02 5:38 ` Mingming Cao
2008-06-02 6:35 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-02 7:04 ` Mingming Cao
2008-06-02 8:05 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-03 4:43 ` Mingming Cao
2008-06-03 10:07 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080603100734.GB16102@skywalker \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox