* - jbd-tidy-up-revoke-cache-initialisation-and-destruction.patch removed from -mm tree
@ 2008-07-25 22:56 akpm
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: akpm @ 2008-07-25 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: duaneg, linux-ext4, mm-commits
The patch titled
jbd: tidy up revoke cache initialisation and destruction
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
jbd-tidy-up-revoke-cache-initialisation-and-destruction.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: jbd: tidy up revoke cache initialisation and destruction
From: "Duane Griffin" <duaneg@dghda.com>
Make revocation cache destruction safe to call if initialisation fails
partially or entirely. This allows it to be used to cleanup in the case
of initialisation failure, simplifying that code slightly.
Signed-off-by: Duane Griffin <duaneg@dghda.com>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
fs/jbd/revoke.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/jbd/revoke.c~jbd-tidy-up-revoke-cache-initialisation-and-destruction fs/jbd/revoke.c
--- a/fs/jbd/revoke.c~jbd-tidy-up-revoke-cache-initialisation-and-destruction
+++ a/fs/jbd/revoke.c
@@ -166,33 +166,43 @@ static struct jbd_revoke_record_s *find_
return NULL;
}
+void journal_destroy_revoke_caches(void)
+{
+ if (revoke_record_cache) {
+ kmem_cache_destroy(revoke_record_cache);
+ revoke_record_cache = NULL;
+ }
+ if (revoke_table_cache) {
+ kmem_cache_destroy(revoke_table_cache);
+ revoke_table_cache = NULL;
+ }
+}
+
int __init journal_init_revoke_caches(void)
{
+ J_ASSERT(!revoke_record_cache);
+ J_ASSERT(!revoke_table_cache);
+
revoke_record_cache = kmem_cache_create("revoke_record",
sizeof(struct jbd_revoke_record_s),
0,
SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN|SLAB_TEMPORARY,
NULL);
if (!revoke_record_cache)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ goto record_cache_failure;
revoke_table_cache = kmem_cache_create("revoke_table",
sizeof(struct jbd_revoke_table_s),
0, SLAB_TEMPORARY, NULL);
- if (!revoke_table_cache) {
- kmem_cache_destroy(revoke_record_cache);
- revoke_record_cache = NULL;
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
+ if (!revoke_table_cache)
+ goto table_cache_failure;
+
return 0;
-}
-void journal_destroy_revoke_caches(void)
-{
- kmem_cache_destroy(revoke_record_cache);
- revoke_record_cache = NULL;
- kmem_cache_destroy(revoke_table_cache);
- revoke_table_cache = NULL;
+table_cache_failure:
+ journal_destroy_revoke_caches();
+record_cache_failure:
+ return -ENOMEM;
}
static struct jbd_revoke_table_s *journal_init_revoke_table(int hash_size)
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from duaneg@dghda.com are
origin.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* - jbd-tidy-up-revoke-cache-initialisation-and-destruction.patch removed from -mm tree
@ 2008-05-10 0:34 akpm
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: akpm @ 2008-05-10 0:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: duaneg, linux-ext4, mm-commits
The patch titled
jbd: tidy up revoke cache initialisation and destruction
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
jbd-tidy-up-revoke-cache-initialisation-and-destruction.patch
This patch was dropped because it had testing failures
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: jbd: tidy up revoke cache initialisation and destruction
From: "Duane Griffin" <duaneg@dghda.com>
Make revoke cache destruction safe to call if initialisation fails partially
or entirely. This allows it to be used to cleanup in the case of
initialisation failure, simplifying that code slightly.
Signed-off-by: Duane Griffin <duaneg@dghda.com>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
fs/jbd/revoke.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/jbd/revoke.c~jbd-tidy-up-revoke-cache-initialisation-and-destruction fs/jbd/revoke.c
--- a/fs/jbd/revoke.c~jbd-tidy-up-revoke-cache-initialisation-and-destruction
+++ a/fs/jbd/revoke.c
@@ -166,33 +166,41 @@ static struct jbd_revoke_record_s *find_
return NULL;
}
+void journal_destroy_revoke_caches(void)
+{
+ if (revoke_record_cache) {
+ kmem_cache_destroy(revoke_record_cache);
+ revoke_record_cache = NULL;
+ }
+ if (revoke_table_cache) {
+ kmem_cache_destroy(revoke_table_cache);
+ revoke_table_cache = NULL;
+ }
+}
+
int __init journal_init_revoke_caches(void)
{
+ J_ASSERT(!revoke_record_cache);
+ J_ASSERT(!revoke_table_cache);
+
revoke_record_cache = kmem_cache_create("revoke_record",
sizeof(struct jbd_revoke_record_s),
0,
SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN|SLAB_TEMPORARY,
NULL);
if (!revoke_record_cache)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ goto record_cache_failure;
revoke_table_cache = kmem_cache_create("revoke_table",
sizeof(struct jbd_revoke_table_s),
0, SLAB_TEMPORARY, NULL);
- if (!revoke_table_cache) {
- kmem_cache_destroy(revoke_record_cache);
- revoke_record_cache = NULL;
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
- return 0;
-}
+ if (!revoke_table_cache)
+ goto table_cache_failure;
-void journal_destroy_revoke_caches(void)
-{
- kmem_cache_destroy(revoke_record_cache);
- revoke_record_cache = NULL;
- kmem_cache_destroy(revoke_table_cache);
- revoke_table_cache = NULL;
+table_cache_failure:
+ journal_destroy_revoke_caches();
+record_cache_failure:
+ return -ENOMEM;
}
static struct jbd_revoke_table_s *journal_init_revoke_table(int hash_size)
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from duaneg@dghda.com are
jbd-tidy-up-revoke-cache-initialisation-and-destruction.patch
jbd-replace-potentially-false-assertion-with-if-block.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-07-25 23:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-07-25 22:56 - jbd-tidy-up-revoke-cache-initialisation-and-destruction.patch removed from -mm tree akpm
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-10 0:34 akpm
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox