From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>,
Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fiemap, an extent mapping ioctl
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:47:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080910134727.GA17498@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080910124934.GB4563@wotan.suse.de>
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 05:49:34AM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> * FIEMAP_FLAG_XATTR
> If this flag is set, the extents returned will describe the inodes
> extended attribute lookup tree, instead of it's data tree.
So does this actually make sense for any filesystem but XFS? Still
seems like a not too useful option for a highlevel generic interface.
> __u32 fe_device; /* device number for extent */
As sayd before please kill thise one. It doesn't make any sense at all
for any merged or near mainline FS. It'd be an utterly stupid
lustre-specific hack that still doesn't make much sense.
> * FIEMAP_EXTENT_NO_BYPASS
> Direct access to the data in this extent is illegal or will have
> undefined results.
Huh? What is direct access? Direct access as in bypassing the
filesystem and writing to the blockdev directly always has undefined
results.
> * FIEMAP_EXTENT_SECONDARY
> The data for this extent is in secondary storage (e.g. HSM). If the
> data is not also in the filesystem, then FIEMAP_EXTENT_NO_BYPASS
> should also be set.
No HSM in mainline, so please drop it. We can add it once we get HSM
support.
> * FIEMAP_EXTENT_NET
> - This will also set FIEMAP_EXTENT_NO_BYPASS
> The data for this extent is not stored in a locally-accessible device.
Doesn't make any sense currently, please drop.
> * FIEMAP_EXTENT_DATA_COMPRESSED
> - This will also set FIEMAP_EXTENT_NO_BYPASS
> The data in this extent has been compressed by the file system.
Add once we have users for it.
> * FIEMAP_EXTENT_DATA_ENCRYPTED
> - This will also set FIEMAP_EXTENT_NO_BYPASS
> The data in this extent has been encrypted by the file system.
>
> * FIEMAP_EXTENT_NOT_ALIGNED
> Extent offsets and length are not guaranteed to be block aligned.
>
> * FIEMAP_EXTENT_DATA_INLINE
> This will also set FIEMAP_EXTENT_NOT_ALIGNED
> Data is located within a meta data block.
>
> * FIEMAP_EXTENT_DATA_TAIL
> This will also set FIEMAP_EXTENT_NOT_ALIGNED
> Data is packed into a block with data from other files.
>
> * FIEMAP_EXTENT_UNWRITTEN
> Unwritten extent - the extent is allocated but it's data has not been
> initialized. This indicates the extent's data will be all zero if read
> through the filesystem but the contents are undefined if read directly from
> the device.
>
> * FIEMAP_EXTENT_MERGED
> This will be set when a file does not support extents, i.e., it uses a block
> based addressing scheme. Since returning an extent for each block back to
> userspace would be highly inefficient, the kernel will try to merge most
> adjacent blocks into 'extents'.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-10 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-25 20:22 FIEMAP patches Andreas Dilger
2008-08-26 6:22 ` Mark Fasheh
2008-08-26 6:57 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-09-10 12:40 ` Mark Fasheh
2008-09-10 12:49 ` [PATCH 0/3] Fiemap, an extent mapping ioctl Mark Fasheh
2008-09-10 13:47 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2008-09-10 14:07 ` Theodore Tso
2008-09-10 14:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-09-10 20:33 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-09-10 16:10 ` Mark Fasheh
2008-09-10 16:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-09-10 18:46 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-10 19:46 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-09-10 12:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] vfs: vfs-level fiemap interface Mark Fasheh
2008-09-10 12:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] generic block based fiemap implementation Mark Fasheh
2008-09-10 12:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] ocfs2: fiemap support Mark Fasheh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080910134727.GA17498@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=esandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox