public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>,
	Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fiemap, an extent mapping ioctl
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:47:27 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080910134727.GA17498@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080910124934.GB4563@wotan.suse.de>

On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 05:49:34AM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> * FIEMAP_FLAG_XATTR
> If this flag is set, the extents returned will describe the inodes
> extended attribute lookup tree, instead of it's data tree.

So does this actually make sense for any filesystem but XFS?  Still
seems like a not too useful option for a highlevel generic interface.

> 	__u32	fe_device;   /* device number for extent */

As sayd before please kill thise one.  It doesn't make any sense at all
for any merged or near mainline FS.  It'd be an utterly stupid
lustre-specific hack that still doesn't make much sense.

> * FIEMAP_EXTENT_NO_BYPASS
> Direct access to the data in this extent is illegal or will have
> undefined results.

Huh?  What is direct access?  Direct access as in bypassing the
filesystem and writing to the blockdev directly always has undefined
results.

> * FIEMAP_EXTENT_SECONDARY
> The data for this extent is in secondary storage (e.g. HSM).  If the
> data is not also in the filesystem, then FIEMAP_EXTENT_NO_BYPASS
> should also be set.

No HSM in mainline, so please drop it.  We can add it once we get HSM
support.

> * FIEMAP_EXTENT_NET
>   - This will also set FIEMAP_EXTENT_NO_BYPASS
> The data for this extent is not stored in a locally-accessible device.

Doesn't make any sense currently, please drop.

> * FIEMAP_EXTENT_DATA_COMPRESSED
>   - This will also set FIEMAP_EXTENT_NO_BYPASS
> The data in this extent has been compressed by the file system.

Add once we have users for it.

> * FIEMAP_EXTENT_DATA_ENCRYPTED
>   - This will also set FIEMAP_EXTENT_NO_BYPASS
> The data in this extent has been encrypted by the file system.
> 
> * FIEMAP_EXTENT_NOT_ALIGNED
> Extent offsets and length are not guaranteed to be block aligned.
> 
> * FIEMAP_EXTENT_DATA_INLINE
>   This will also set FIEMAP_EXTENT_NOT_ALIGNED
> Data is located within a meta data block.
> 
> * FIEMAP_EXTENT_DATA_TAIL
>   This will also set FIEMAP_EXTENT_NOT_ALIGNED
> Data is packed into a block with data from other files.
> 
> * FIEMAP_EXTENT_UNWRITTEN
> Unwritten extent - the extent is allocated but it's data has not been
> initialized.  This indicates the extent's data will be all zero if read
> through the filesystem but the contents are undefined if read directly from
> the device.
> 
> * FIEMAP_EXTENT_MERGED
> This will be set when a file does not support extents, i.e., it uses a block
> based addressing scheme.  Since returning an extent for each block back to
> userspace would be highly inefficient, the kernel will try to merge most
> adjacent blocks into 'extents'.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-10 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-25 20:22 FIEMAP patches Andreas Dilger
2008-08-26  6:22 ` Mark Fasheh
2008-08-26  6:57   ` Andreas Dilger
2008-09-10 12:40 ` Mark Fasheh
2008-09-10 12:49   ` [PATCH 0/3] Fiemap, an extent mapping ioctl Mark Fasheh
2008-09-10 13:47     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2008-09-10 14:07       ` Theodore Tso
2008-09-10 14:11         ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-09-10 20:33           ` Andreas Dilger
2008-09-10 16:10       ` Mark Fasheh
2008-09-10 16:20         ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-09-10 18:46     ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-10 19:46       ` Andreas Dilger
2008-09-10 12:49   ` [PATCH 1/3] vfs: vfs-level fiemap interface Mark Fasheh
2008-09-10 12:50   ` [PATCH 2/3] generic block based fiemap implementation Mark Fasheh
2008-09-10 12:50   ` [PATCH 3/3] ocfs2: fiemap support Mark Fasheh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080910134727.GA17498@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=adilger@sun.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=esandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox