public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Cc: "'Lukáš Czerner'" <lczerner@redhat.com>,
	"'Jan Kara'" <jack@suse.cz>,
	'linux-ext4' <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ext4: fix ZERO_RANGE test failure in data journalling mode
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:37:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140418143711.GA19131@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001101cf5aa7$49718b50$dc54a1f0$@samsung.com>

So a couple of things.  First of all, ext4_force_commit() is a very
expensive call, so calling it twice is really not a good idea.

Secondly, in the ext4_collapse_range() you are calling
ext4_force_commit() before filemap_write_and_wait_range().

	/* Call ext4_force_commit to flush all data in case of data=journal. */
	if (ext4_should_journal_data(inode)) {
		ret = ext4_force_commit(inode->i_sb);
		if (ret)
			return ret;
	}

	/* Write out all dirty pages */
	ret = filemap_write_and_wait_range(inode->i_mapping, offset, -1);
	if (ret)
		return ret;

Shouldn't we reverse these two calls?

Finally, I'm wondering if we would be better off creating a new
explicit EXT4_I(inode)->i_write_mutex which is used to block new
writes from starting.  This could also be used to subsume the
ext4_aio_mutex.

						- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-18 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-16 22:29 [PATCH 2/3] ext4: fix ZERO_RANGE test failure in data journalling mode Namjae Jeon
2014-04-17  8:53 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-04-17 10:52   ` Namjae Jeon
2014-04-17 11:00     ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-04-17 12:01       ` Namjae Jeon
2014-04-17 12:16         ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-04-18  1:41           ` Namjae Jeon
2014-04-18 14:37             ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2014-04-18 16:25               ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-04-19  2:40               ` Namjae Jeon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140418143711.GA19131@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namjae.jeon@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox