* Re: CRASH : RCU detected stall [not found] <CAKEzZ8wRAFxXOcgxzu2KkntvNz8QvGocWpH_xDbRxRg=7LgbPA@mail.gmail.com> @ 2017-06-13 17:30 ` Theodore Ts'o [not found] ` <CAKEzZ8yb_n+iCy8+_fYujc1LAbijjjd97+dEh9qrwNfx0GAqUw@mail.gmail.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Theodore Ts'o @ 2017-06-13 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ramin Farajpour Cami; +Cc: adilger.kernel, linux-ext4, linux-kernel, syzkaller On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 07:35:37PM +0430, Ramin Farajpour Cami wrote: > Hi, > > I've got the following error report while fuzzing the kernel with syzkaller > version (4.12-rc5) > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/syzkaller/4e8MkNnRFRQ Can you reliably reproduce this failure? If so, please give details. Unfortunately this sort of RCU self-stall can be caused by any number of things. - Ted ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CAKEzZ8yb_n+iCy8+_fYujc1LAbijjjd97+dEh9qrwNfx0GAqUw@mail.gmail.com>]
* Re: CRASH : RCU detected stall [not found] ` <CAKEzZ8yb_n+iCy8+_fYujc1LAbijjjd97+dEh9qrwNfx0GAqUw@mail.gmail.com> @ 2017-06-14 12:55 ` Theodore Ts'o 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Theodore Ts'o @ 2017-06-14 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ramin Farajpour Cami; +Cc: adilger.kernel, linux-ext4, linux-kernel, syzkaller On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 10:02:00AM +0430, Ramin Farajpour Cami wrote: > > Unfortunately it's not reproducible. do you have idea about it? Nope. Note that this isn't necessarily an ext4 bug. We have two complaints about an rcu_sched thread getting staved and an NMI handler getting taking too long to run: rcu_sched kthread starved for 22270 jiffies! g2951 c2950 f0x0 INFO: NMI handler (nmi_cpu_backtrace_handler) took too long to run: 2.762 msecs We also happened be doing writeback on another CPU and the ext4 thread was doing a slab allocation. What ultimiately caused the RCU starvation is not at all clear. Were we spinning inside the slab allocator, or not? Getting some magic-sysrq triggers to see if the PC was always in the slab allocator would be useful. And if that's the case, it's not clear what might have caused us to spinning in the slab allocator. It could be due to some slab state getting corrupted by a previous system call, and ext4 was just unlucky enough to do the slab allocation which caused it to go for a loop. We just don't have enough information to do any kind of useful investigation. - Ted ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-06-14 12:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CAKEzZ8wRAFxXOcgxzu2KkntvNz8QvGocWpH_xDbRxRg=7LgbPA@mail.gmail.com>
2017-06-13 17:30 ` CRASH : RCU detected stall Theodore Ts'o
[not found] ` <CAKEzZ8yb_n+iCy8+_fYujc1LAbijjjd97+dEh9qrwNfx0GAqUw@mail.gmail.com>
2017-06-14 12:55 ` Theodore Ts'o
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox