Linux EXT4 FS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: zhanchengbin <zhanchengbin1@huawei.com>
To: <tytso@mit.edu>, <jack@suse.com>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
	<linfeilong@huawei.com>, <liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com>,
	zhanchengbin <zhanchengbin1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/2] fix extents need to be restored when ext4_ext_insert_extent failed
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 12:05:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230213040522.3339406-1-zhanchengbin1@huawei.com> (raw)

Inside the ext4_ext_insert_extent function, every error returned will
not destroy the consistency of the tree. Even if it fails after changing
half of the tree, can also ensure that the tree is self-consistent, like
function ext4_ext_create_new_leaf.
After ext4_ext_insert_extent fails, update extent status tree depends on
the incoming split_flag. So restore the len of extent to be split when
ext4_ext_insert_extent return failed in ext4_split_extent_at.

Diff v2 Vs v1:
1) return directly after inserting successfully
2) restore the length of extent in memory after inserting unsuccessfully

Diff v3 Vs v2:
Sorry for not taking into account the successful extent insertion. and I
reanalyzed the ext4_ext_insert_extent function and modified the conditions
for restoring the length.

Diff v4 Vs v3:
Clear the verified flag from the modified bh when failed inext4_ext_rm_idx
or ext4_ext_correct_indexes.

zhanchengbin (2):
  ext4: fix inode tree inconsistency caused by ENOMEM in
    ext4_split_extent_at
  ext4: clear the verified flag of the modified leaf or idx if error

 fs/ext4/extents.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
2.31.1


             reply	other threads:[~2023-02-13  3:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-13  4:05 zhanchengbin [this message]
2023-02-13  4:05 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] ext4: fix inode tree inconsistency caused by ENOMEM in ext4_split_extent_at zhanchengbin
2023-02-14 11:48   ` Jan Kara
2023-02-15  8:51     ` zhanchengbin
2023-02-16 13:07       ` Jan Kara
2023-02-19  3:35       ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-02-13  4:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ext4: clear the verified flag of the modified leaf or idx if error zhanchengbin
2023-02-13  6:18   ` kernel test robot
2023-02-13  6:19   ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230213040522.3339406-1-zhanchengbin1@huawei.com \
    --to=zhanchengbin1@huawei.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=linfeilong@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox