From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: zhanchengbin <zhanchengbin1@huawei.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
tytso@mit.edu, jack@suse.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@huawei.com, linfeilong@huawei.com,
liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ext4: fix inode tree inconsistency caused by ENOMEM in ext4_split_extent_at
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 14:07:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230216130715.kcvcvitdinpv7wwt@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a666524b-e811-c35e-3f2b-f2d63622f674@huawei.com>
On Wed 15-02-23 16:51:23, zhanchengbin wrote:
>
> On 2023/2/14 19:48, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Mon 13-02-23 12:05:21, zhanchengbin wrote:
> > > If ENOMEM fails when the extent is splitting, we need to restore the length
> > > of the split extent.
> > > In the call stack of the ext4_split_extent_at function, only in
> > > ext4_ext_create_new_leaf will it alloc memory and change the shape of the
> > > extent tree,even if an ENOMEM is returned at this time, the extent tree is
> > > still self-consistent, Just restore the split extent lens in the function
> > > ext4_split_extent_at.
> > >
> > > ext4_split_extent_at
> > > ext4_ext_insert_extent
> > > ext4_ext_create_new_leaf
> > > 1)ext4_ext_split
> > > ext4_find_extent
> > > 2)ext4_ext_grow_indepth
> > > ext4_find_extent
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: zhanchengbin <zhanchengbin1@huawei.com>
> > > ---
> > > fs/ext4/extents.c | 3 ++-
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> > > index 9de1c9d1a13d..0f95e857089e 100644
> > > --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
> > > +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> > > @@ -935,6 +935,7 @@ ext4_find_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t block,
> > > bh = read_extent_tree_block(inode, path[ppos].p_idx, --i, flags);
> > > if (IS_ERR(bh)) {
> > > + EXT4_ERROR_INODE(inode, "IO error reading extent block");
> >
> > Why have you added this? Usually we don't log any additional errors for IO
> > errors because the storage layer already reports it... Furthermore this
> > would potentialy panic the system / remount the fs RO which we also usually
> > don't do in case of IO errors, only in case of FS corruption.
> >
> > Honza
>
> Because failure of read_extent_tree_block indirectly leads to filesystem
> inconsistency in ext4_split_extent_at, I want the filesystem to become
> read-only after failure.
Can you please describe how exactly? Because I'd rather declare the error
directly in ext4_split_extent_at() than in ext4_find_extent() unless it
gets too complicated...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-16 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-13 4:05 [PATCH v4 0/2] fix extents need to be restored when ext4_ext_insert_extent failed zhanchengbin
2023-02-13 4:05 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] ext4: fix inode tree inconsistency caused by ENOMEM in ext4_split_extent_at zhanchengbin
2023-02-14 11:48 ` Jan Kara
2023-02-15 8:51 ` zhanchengbin
2023-02-16 13:07 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2023-02-19 3:35 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-02-13 4:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ext4: clear the verified flag of the modified leaf or idx if error zhanchengbin
2023-02-13 6:18 ` kernel test robot
2023-02-13 6:19 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230216130715.kcvcvitdinpv7wwt@quack3 \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=linfeilong@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=zhanchengbin1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox