* Re: regression in 6.1.yy branch: LTP test preadv03 fails [not found] <c1f93c13-4865-b5a8-8969-4c2f5cb8f776@kalrayinc.com> @ 2023-12-07 10:13 ` Greg KH 2023-12-07 10:50 ` Yann Sionneau 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2023-12-07 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yann Sionneau; +Cc: Theodore Ts'o, Andreas Dilger, linux-ext4, linux-kernel On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 11:05:15AM +0100, Yann Sionneau wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed yesterday that LTP test preadv03 now fails since 6.1.64 (it also > fails on 6.1.65). > > 6.6.4, 6.6.3, 6.5.0 and 6.2.0 seem to be unaffected. > > I tested this on x86_64 and kvx arch (the latter is not upstream). > > I can see some ext4 related commits on 6.1.64 and 6.1.65 changes, maybe it's > related, therefore I add ext4 mailing list as CC. > > I didn't run git bisect on this so far because I noticed building an x86_64 > ubuntu kernel on my laptop was taking ages. Maybe someone is more used to > dealing with this and can bisect this way faster than me. Should be fixed in the latest 6.1.y-rc release, right? If not, please let me know. thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: regression in 6.1.yy branch: LTP test preadv03 fails 2023-12-07 10:13 ` regression in 6.1.yy branch: LTP test preadv03 fails Greg KH @ 2023-12-07 10:50 ` Yann Sionneau 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Yann Sionneau @ 2023-12-07 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH; +Cc: Theodore Ts'o, Andreas Dilger, linux-ext4, linux-kernel On 12/7/23 11:13, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 11:05:15AM +0100, Yann Sionneau wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I noticed yesterday that LTP test preadv03 now fails since 6.1.64 (it also >> fails on 6.1.65). >> >> 6.6.4, 6.6.3, 6.5.0 and 6.2.0 seem to be unaffected. >> >> I tested this on x86_64 and kvx arch (the latter is not upstream). >> >> I can see some ext4 related commits on 6.1.64 and 6.1.65 changes, maybe it's >> related, therefore I add ext4 mailing list as CC. >> >> I didn't run git bisect on this so far because I noticed building an x86_64 >> ubuntu kernel on my laptop was taking ages. Maybe someone is more used to >> dealing with this and can bisect this way faster than me. > Should be fixed in the latest 6.1.y-rc release, right? If not, please > let me know. Thanks for the quick reply, indeed it seems way better on 6.1.66-rc2. I tested on kvx arch, all preadv* LTP tests are passing: ``` # ./preadv03 tst_device.c:88: TINFO: Found free device 0 '/dev/loop0' [ 346.920257] loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 524288 [ 346.970126] /dev/zero: Can't open blockdev tst_supported_fs_types.c:89: TINFO: Kernel supports ext2 tst_supported_fs_types.c:51: TINFO: mkfs.ext2 does exist [ 346.993817] /dev/zero: Can't open blockdev tst_supported_fs_types.c:89: TINFO: Kernel supports ext3 tst_supported_fs_types.c:51: TINFO: mkfs.ext3 does exist [ 347.021140] /dev/zero: Can't open blockdev tst_supported_fs_types.c:89: TINFO: Kernel supports ext4 tst_supported_fs_types.c:51: TINFO: mkfs.ext4 does exist tst_supported_fs_types.c:89: TINFO: Kernel supports vfat tst_supported_fs_types.c:47: TINFO: mkfs.vfat does not exist tst_supported_fs_types.c:156: TINFO: Skipping tmpfs as requested by the test tst_test.c:1500: TINFO: Testing on ext2 tst_test.c:996: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with ext2 opts='' extra opts='' mke2fs 1.46.2 (28-Feb-2021) [ 347.283637] blk_print_req_error: 96 callbacks suppressed [ 347.283662] operation not supported error, dev loop0, sector 524160 op 0x9:(WRITE_ZEROES) flags 0x800 0800 phys_seg 0 prio class 2 [ 347.301367] operation not supported error, dev loop0, sector 522 op 0x9:(WRITE_ZEROES) flags 0x800080 0 phys_seg 0 prio class 2 [ 347.313610] operation not supported error, dev loop0, sector 16906 op 0x9:(WRITE_ZEROES) flags 0x8000 800 phys_seg 0 prio class 2 [ 347.325948] operation not supported error, dev loop0, sector 32774 op 0x9:(WRITE_ZEROES) flags 0x8000 800 phys_seg 0 prio class 2 [ 347.338311] operation not supported error, dev loop0, sector 49674 op 0x9:(WRITE_ZEROES) flags 0x8000 800 phys_seg 0 prio class 2 [ 347.350667] operation not supported error, dev loop0, sector 65542 op 0x9:(WRITE_ZEROES) flags 0x8000 800 phys_seg 0 prio class 2 [ 347.363027] operation not supported error, dev loop0, sector 82442 op 0x9:(WRITE_ZEROES) flags 0x8000 800 phys_seg 0 prio class 2 [ 347.375367] operation not supported error, dev loop0, sector 98310 op 0x9:(WRITE_ZEROES) flags 0x8000 800 phys_seg 0 prio class 2 [ 347.387733] operation not supported error, dev loop0, sector 115210 op 0x9:(WRITE_ZEROES) flags 0x800 0800 phys_seg 0 prio class 2 [ 347.400156] operation not supported error, dev loop0, sector 131078 op 0x9:(WRITE_ZEROES) flags 0x800 0800 phys_seg 0 prio class 2 [ 347.445283] EXT4-fs (loop0): mounting ext2 file system using the ext4 subsystem [ 347.453761] EXT4-fs (loop0): mounted filesystem without journal. Quota mode: disabled. [ 347.461716] ext2 filesystem being mounted at /tmp/preB0llUr/mntpoint supports timestamps until 2038 ( 0x7fffffff) tst_test.c:1431: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s [ 347.475662] EXT4-fs (loop0): unmounting filesystem. preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'a' expectedly preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'a' expectedly preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'b' expectedly tst_test.c:1500: TINFO: Testing on ext3 tst_test.c:996: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with ext3 opts='' extra opts='' mke2fs 1.46.2 (28-Feb-2021) [ 347.780931] EXT4-fs (loop0): mounting ext3 file system using the ext4 subsystem [ 347.791652] EXT4-fs (loop0): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Quota mode: disabled. [ 347.800197] ext3 filesystem being mounted at /tmp/preB0llUr/mntpoint supports timestamps until 2038 ( 0x7fffffff) tst_test.c:1431: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s [ 347.814544] EXT4-fs (loop0): unmounting filesystem. preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'a' expectedly preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'a' expectedly preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'b' expectedly tst_test.c:1500: TINFO: Testing on ext4 tst_test.c:996: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with ext4 opts='' extra opts='' mke2fs 1.46.2 (28-Feb-2021) [ 347.888885] EXT4-fs (loop0): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Quota mode: disabled. [ 347.897455] ext4 filesystem being mounted at /tmp/preB0llUr/mntpoint supports timestamps until 2038 ( 0x7fffffff) tst_test.c:1431: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s [ 347.911462] EXT4-fs (loop0): unmounting filesystem. preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'a' expectedly preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'a' expectedly preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'b' expectedly Summary: passed 9 failed 0 broken 0 skipped 0 warnings 0 ``` The errors during mkfs are weird but maybe it's an issue in kvx port... at least the test is passing now. Thanks! -- Yann ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* regression in 6.1.yy branch: LTP test preadv03 fails @ 2023-12-07 10:11 Yann Sionneau 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Yann Sionneau @ 2023-12-07 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gregkh, Theodore Ts'o, Andreas Dilger; +Cc: linux-ext4, linux-kernel Hello, I noticed yesterday that LTP test preadv03 now fails since 6.1.64 (it also fails on 6.1.65). 6.6.4, 6.6.3, 6.5.0 and 6.2.0 seem to be unaffected. I tested this on x86_64 and kvx arch (the latter is not upstream). I can see some ext4 related commits on 6.1.64 and 6.1.65 changes, maybe it's related, therefore I add ext4 mailing list as CC. I didn't run git bisect on this so far because I noticed building an x86_64 ubuntu kernel on my laptop was taking ages. Maybe someone is more used to dealing with this and can bisect this way faster than me. How to reproduce: ``` git clone https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp.git cd ltp && make autotools && ./configure make -j4 cd testcases/kernel/syscalls/preadv sudo ./preadv03 ``` On 6.1.64 x86_64 kernel for instance it gives: ``` ysionneau@KALRAY-LP238:~/dev/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/preadv$ uname -a Linux KALRAY-LP238 6.1.64-060164-generic #202311281737 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Tue Nov 28 18:22:03 UTC 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ysionneau@KALRAY-LP238:~/dev/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/preadv$ sudo ./preadv03 tst_device.c:96: TINFO: Found free device 43 '/dev/loop43' tst_test.c:1690: TINFO: LTP version: 20230929-193-g9de9ac6c1 tst_test.c:1574: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 00m 30s tst_supported_fs_types.c:90: TINFO: Kernel supports ext2 tst_supported_fs_types.c:55: TINFO: mkfs.ext2 does exist tst_supported_fs_types.c:90: TINFO: Kernel supports ext3 tst_supported_fs_types.c:55: TINFO: mkfs.ext3 does exist tst_supported_fs_types.c:90: TINFO: Kernel supports ext4 tst_supported_fs_types.c:55: TINFO: mkfs.ext4 does exist tst_supported_fs_types.c:90: TINFO: Kernel supports xfs tst_supported_fs_types.c:51: TINFO: mkfs.xfs does not exist tst_supported_fs_types.c:90: TINFO: Kernel supports btrfs tst_supported_fs_types.c:51: TINFO: mkfs.btrfs does not exist tst_supported_fs_types.c:90: TINFO: Kernel supports vfat tst_supported_fs_types.c:55: TINFO: mkfs.vfat does exist tst_supported_fs_types.c:90: TINFO: Kernel supports exfat tst_supported_fs_types.c:51: TINFO: mkfs.exfat does not exist tst_supported_fs_types.c:90: TINFO: Kernel supports ntfs tst_supported_fs_types.c:55: TINFO: mkfs.ntfs does exist tst_supported_fs_types.c:157: TINFO: Skipping tmpfs as requested by the test tst_test.c:1650: TINFO: === Testing on ext2 === tst_test.c:1105: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop43 with ext2 opts='' extra opts='' mke2fs 1.46.5 (30-Dec-2021) tst_test.c:1119: TINFO: Mounting /dev/loop43 to /tmp/LTP_pretsQ0lS/mntpoint fstyp=ext2 flags=0 preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 preadv03.c:66: TFAIL: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 0 bytes, expected 512 tst_test.c:1650: TINFO: === Testing on ext3 === tst_test.c:1105: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop43 with ext3 opts='' extra opts='' mke2fs 1.46.5 (30-Dec-2021) tst_test.c:1119: TINFO: Mounting /dev/loop43 to /tmp/LTP_pretsQ0lS/mntpoint fstyp=ext3 flags=0 preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 preadv03.c:66: TFAIL: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 0 bytes, expected 512 tst_test.c:1650: TINFO: === Testing on ext4 === tst_test.c:1105: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop43 with ext4 opts='' extra opts='' mke2fs 1.46.5 (30-Dec-2021) tst_test.c:1119: TINFO: Mounting /dev/loop43 to /tmp/LTP_pretsQ0lS/mntpoint fstyp=ext4 flags=0 preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 preadv03.c:66: TFAIL: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 0 bytes, expected 512 tst_test.c:1650: TINFO: === Testing on vfat === tst_test.c:1105: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop43 with vfat opts='' extra opts='' tst_test.c:1119: TINFO: Mounting /dev/loop43 to /tmp/LTP_pretsQ0lS/mntpoint fstyp=vfat flags=0 preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'a' expectedly preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'a' expectedly preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'b' expectedly tst_test.c:1650: TINFO: === Testing on ntfs === tst_test.c:1105: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop43 with ntfs opts='' extra opts='' The partition start sector was not specified for /dev/loop43 and it could not be obtained automatically. It has been set to 0. The number of sectors per track was not specified for /dev/loop43 and it could not be obtained automatically. It has been set to 0. The number of heads was not specified for /dev/loop43 and it could not be obtained automatically. It has been set to 0. To boot from a device, Windows needs the 'partition start sector', the 'sectors per track' and the 'number of heads' to be set. Windows will not be able to boot from this device. tst_test.c:1119: TINFO: Mounting /dev/loop43 to /tmp/LTP_pretsQ0lS/mntpoint fstyp=ntfs flags=0 tst_test.c:1119: TINFO: Trying FUSE... preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'a' expectedly preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'a' expectedly preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'b' expectedly Summary: passed 6 failed 9 broken 0 skipped 0 warnings 0 ``` Cheers, -- Yann ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-12-07 10:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <c1f93c13-4865-b5a8-8969-4c2f5cb8f776@kalrayinc.com>
2023-12-07 10:13 ` regression in 6.1.yy branch: LTP test preadv03 fails Greg KH
2023-12-07 10:50 ` Yann Sionneau
2023-12-07 10:11 Yann Sionneau
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox