public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
To: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <tytso@mit.edu>, <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>, <jack@suse.cz>,
	<ritesh.list@gmail.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<yi.zhang@huawei.com>, <yangerkun@huawei.com>,
	<yukuai3@huawei.com>, <libaokun1@huawei.com>,
	<stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] ext4: avoid bb_free and bb_fragments inconsistency in mb_free_blocks()
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 22:18:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231218141814.1477338-4-libaokun1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231218141814.1477338-1-libaokun1@huawei.com>

After updating bb_free in mb_free_blocks, it is possible to return without
updating bb_fragments because the block being freed is found to have
already been freed, which leads to inconsistency between bb_free and
bb_fragments.

Since the group may be unlocked in ext4_grp_locked_error(), this can lead
to problems such as dividing by zero when calculating the average fragment
length. Therefore, to ensure consistency, move the update of bb_free to
after the block double-free check.

Fixes: eabe0444df90 ("ext4: speed-up releasing blocks on commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
---
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index a95fa6e2b0f9..2fbee0f0f5c3 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -1892,11 +1892,6 @@ static void mb_free_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_buddy *e4b,
 	mb_check_buddy(e4b);
 	mb_free_blocks_double(inode, e4b, first, count);
 
-	this_cpu_inc(discard_pa_seq);
-	e4b->bd_info->bb_free += count;
-	if (first < e4b->bd_info->bb_first_free)
-		e4b->bd_info->bb_first_free = first;
-
 	/* access memory sequentially: check left neighbour,
 	 * clear range and then check right neighbour
 	 */
@@ -1922,9 +1917,14 @@ static void mb_free_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_buddy *e4b,
 				sb, e4b->bd_group,
 				EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
 		}
-		goto done;
+		return;
 	}
 
+	this_cpu_inc(discard_pa_seq);
+	e4b->bd_info->bb_free += count;
+	if (first < e4b->bd_info->bb_first_free)
+		e4b->bd_info->bb_first_free = first;
+
 	/* let's maintain fragments counter */
 	if (left_is_free && right_is_free)
 		e4b->bd_info->bb_fragments--;
@@ -1949,7 +1949,6 @@ static void mb_free_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_buddy *e4b,
 	if (first <= last)
 		mb_buddy_mark_free(e4b, first >> 1, last >> 1);
 
-done:
 	mb_set_largest_free_order(sb, e4b->bd_info);
 	mb_update_avg_fragment_size(sb, e4b->bd_info);
 	mb_check_buddy(e4b);
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-12-18 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-18 14:18 [PATCH 0/4] ext4: fix divide error in mb_update_avg_fragment_size() Baokun Li
2023-12-18 14:18 ` [PATCH 1/4] ext4: fix double-free of blocks due to wrong extents moved_len Baokun Li
2023-12-18 15:32   ` Jan Kara
2023-12-19  1:51     ` Baokun Li
2023-12-18 14:18 ` [PATCH 2/4] ext4: do not trim the group with corrupted block bitmap Baokun Li
2023-12-18 15:02   ` Jan Kara
2023-12-18 14:18 ` Baokun Li [this message]
2023-12-18 15:14   ` [PATCH 3/4] ext4: avoid bb_free and bb_fragments inconsistency in mb_free_blocks() Jan Kara
2023-12-19  2:29     ` Baokun Li
2023-12-20  9:00     ` Baokun Li
2023-12-18 14:18 ` [PATCH 4/4] ext4: avoid dividing by 0 in mb_update_avg_fragment_size() when block bitmap corrupt Baokun Li
2023-12-18 14:43   ` Jan Kara
2023-12-18 15:09     ` Jan Kara
2023-12-19  8:02       ` Baokun Li
2023-12-20 13:43         ` Baokun Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231218141814.1477338-4-libaokun1@huawei.com \
    --to=libaokun1@huawei.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox