From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
yangerkun@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com,
Wei Chen <harperchen1110@gmail.com>,
xingwei lee <xrivendell7@gmail.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ext4: fix double-free of blocks due to wrong extents moved_len
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 16:32:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231218153227.x273h3c5t2dqgh76@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231218141814.1477338-2-libaokun1@huawei.com>
On Mon 18-12-23 22:18:11, Baokun Li wrote:
> In ext4_move_extents(), moved_len is only updated when all moves are
> successfully executed, and only discards orig_inode and donor_inode
> preallocations when moved_len is not zero. When the loop fails to exit
> after successfully moving some extents, moved_len is not updated and
> remains at 0, so it does not discard the preallocations.
>
> If the moved extents overlap with the preallocated extents, the
> overlapped extents are freed twice in ext4_mb_release_inode_pa() and
> ext4_process_freed_data() (as described in commit 94d7c16cbbbd), and
> bb_free is incremented twice. Hence when trim is executed, a zero-division
> bug is triggered in mb_update_avg_fragment_size() because bb_free is not
> zero and bb_fragments is zero.
>
> Therefore, update move_len after each extent move to avoid the issue.
>
> Reported-by: Wei Chen <harperchen1110@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: xingwei lee <xrivendell7@gmail.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAO4mrferzqBUnCag8R3m2zf897ts9UEuhjFQGPtODT92rYyR2Q@mail.gmail.com
> Fixes: fcf6b1b729bc ("ext4: refactor ext4_move_extents code base")
> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.18
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/move_extent.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
> index 3aa57376d9c2..4b9b503c6346 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
> @@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ ext4_move_extents(struct file *o_filp, struct file *d_filp, __u64 orig_blk,
> */
> ext4_double_up_write_data_sem(orig_inode, donor_inode);
> /* Swap original branches with new branches */
> - move_extent_per_page(o_filp, donor_inode,
> + *moved_len += move_extent_per_page(o_filp, donor_inode,
> orig_page_index, donor_page_index,
> offset_in_page, cur_len,
> unwritten, &ret);
Although this is currently fine, I think ext4_move_extents() should be
careful and zero out *moved_len before it starts using it.
> @@ -682,7 +682,6 @@ ext4_move_extents(struct file *o_filp, struct file *d_filp, __u64 orig_blk,
> o_start += cur_len;
> d_start += cur_len;
> }
> - *moved_len = o_start - orig_blk;
> if (*moved_len > len)
> *moved_len = len;
So I'm not sure the *moved_len > len condition can ever trigger but if it
does, we'd need to check it whenever we are returning moved_len. So either
I'd delete the condition or move it to the out label.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-18 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-18 14:18 [PATCH 0/4] ext4: fix divide error in mb_update_avg_fragment_size() Baokun Li
2023-12-18 14:18 ` [PATCH 1/4] ext4: fix double-free of blocks due to wrong extents moved_len Baokun Li
2023-12-18 15:32 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2023-12-19 1:51 ` Baokun Li
2023-12-18 14:18 ` [PATCH 2/4] ext4: do not trim the group with corrupted block bitmap Baokun Li
2023-12-18 15:02 ` Jan Kara
2023-12-18 14:18 ` [PATCH 3/4] ext4: avoid bb_free and bb_fragments inconsistency in mb_free_blocks() Baokun Li
2023-12-18 15:14 ` Jan Kara
2023-12-19 2:29 ` Baokun Li
2023-12-20 9:00 ` Baokun Li
2023-12-18 14:18 ` [PATCH 4/4] ext4: avoid dividing by 0 in mb_update_avg_fragment_size() when block bitmap corrupt Baokun Li
2023-12-18 14:43 ` Jan Kara
2023-12-18 15:09 ` Jan Kara
2023-12-19 8:02 ` Baokun Li
2023-12-20 13:43 ` Baokun Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231218153227.x273h3c5t2dqgh76@quack3 \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=harperchen1110@gmail.com \
--cc=libaokun1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=xrivendell7@gmail.com \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox