public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	naresh.kamboju@linaro.org, daniel.diaz@linaro.org,
	 linux@roeck-us.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: alloc test super block from sget
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 09:25:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240301-neuland-zoomen-4152b34c6fba@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240301120816.22581-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>

On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 08:08:15PM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> This fix the oops in ext4 unit test which is cuased by NULL sb.s_user_ns
> as following:
> <4>[ 14.344565] map_id_range_down (kernel/user_namespace.c:318)
> <4>[ 14.345378] make_kuid (kernel/user_namespace.c:415)
> <4>[ 14.345998] inode_init_always (include/linux/fs.h:1375 fs/inode.c:174)
> <4>[ 14.346696] alloc_inode (fs/inode.c:268)
> <4>[ 14.347353] new_inode_pseudo (fs/inode.c:1007)
> <4>[ 14.348016] new_inode (fs/inode.c:1033)
> <4>[ 14.348644] ext4_mb_init (fs/ext4/mballoc.c:3404 fs/ext4/mballoc.c:3719)
> <4>[ 14.349312] mbt_kunit_init (fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c:57
> fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c:314)
> <4>[ 14.349983] kunit_try_run_case (lib/kunit/test.c:388 lib/kunit/test.c:443)
> <4>[ 14.350696] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter (lib/kunit/try-catch.c:30)
> <4>[ 14.351530] kthread (kernel/kthread.c:388)
> <4>[ 14.352168] ret_from_fork (arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:861)
> <0>[ 14.353385] Code: 52808004 b8236ae7 72be5e44 b90004c4 (38e368a1)
> 
> Alloc test super block from sget to properly initialize test super block
> to fix the issue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> ---
>  fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
> index 12d0b22cabe1..1da52bbf4599 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
> @@ -21,16 +21,27 @@ struct mbt_ctx {
>  };
>  
>  struct mbt_ext4_super_block {
> -	struct super_block sb;
> +	struct ext4_super_block es;
> +	struct ext4_sb_info sbi;
>  	struct mbt_ctx mbt_ctx;
>  };
>  
> -#define MBT_CTX(_sb) (&(container_of((_sb), struct mbt_ext4_super_block, sb)->mbt_ctx))
> +#define MBT_SB(_sb) (container_of((_sb)->s_fs_info, struct mbt_ext4_super_block, sbi))
> +#define MBT_CTX(_sb) (&MBT_SB(_sb)->mbt_ctx)
>  #define MBT_GRP_CTX(_sb, _group) (&MBT_CTX(_sb)->grp_ctx[_group])
>  
>  static const struct super_operations mbt_sops = {
>  };
>  
> +static void mbt_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static struct file_system_type mbt_fs_type = {
> +	.name			= "mballoc test",
> +	.kill_sb		= mbt_kill_sb,
> +};
> +
>  static int mbt_mb_init(struct super_block *sb)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> @@ -72,43 +83,48 @@ static void mbt_mb_release(struct super_block *sb)
>  	kfree(sb->s_bdev);
>  }
>  
> +static int mbt_set(struct super_block *sb, void *data)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static struct super_block *mbt_ext4_alloc_super_block(void)
>  {
> -	struct ext4_super_block *es = kzalloc(sizeof(*es), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = kzalloc(sizeof(*sbi), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	struct mbt_ext4_super_block *fsb = kzalloc(sizeof(*fsb), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	struct super_block *sb = sget(&mbt_fs_type, NULL, mbt_set, 0, NULL);
> +	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi;
>  
> -	if (fsb == NULL || sbi == NULL || es == NULL)
> +	if (fsb == NULL || sb == NULL)

sget() returns error pointer on failure. So you should check for IS_ERR(sb).

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-01  8:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-01 12:08 [PATCH 0/2] Fix crashes in ext4 unit test Kemeng Shi
2024-03-01 12:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] ext4: alloc test super block from sget Kemeng Shi
2024-03-01  8:25   ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2024-03-01  8:29     ` Christian Brauner
2024-03-01  9:03     ` Kemeng Shi
2024-03-01 12:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] ext4: hold group lock in ext4 kunit test Kemeng Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240301-neuland-zoomen-4152b34c6fba@brauner \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=daniel.diaz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox