public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] ext4: enable mballoc kunit tests for blocksize > PAGE_SIZE
@ 2026-05-06  7:59 Baokun Li
  2026-05-06  9:35 ` Jan Kara
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Baokun Li @ 2026-05-06  7:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-ext4
  Cc: tytso, adilger.kernel, jack, yi.zhang, ojaswin, ritesh.list,
	libaokun

With Large Block Size (LBS) support, ext4 can now use block sizes larger
than PAGE_SIZE. The mballoc kunit tests previously skipped three test
cases (test_mb_mark_used, test_mb_free_blocks, test_mb_mark_used_cost)
under this configuration because the buddy cache inode's folio mapping
order was never initialized in the test harness.

The real mount path configures s_min_folio_order and s_max_folio_order
in ext4_fill_super(), which allows ext4_set_inode_mapping_order() to
set up the correct folio order for the buddy cache inode. The kunit
test bypasses ext4_fill_super(), so the mapping order stayed at zero
and __filemap_get_folio() allocated order-0 folios too small for LBS.

Initialize s_min_folio_order and s_max_folio_order in mbt_init_sb_layout()
to mirror ext4_fill_super() behavior, enabling properly sized folio
allocations and removing the three blocksize > PAGE_SIZE skips.

Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c | 14 ++------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
index 90ed505fa4b1..04bc9f773d63 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
@@ -206,6 +206,8 @@ static void mbt_init_sb_layout(struct super_block *sb,
 	sbi->s_desc_per_block_bits =
 		sb->s_blocksize_bits - (fls(layout->desc_size) - 1);
 	sbi->s_desc_per_block = 1 << sbi->s_desc_per_block_bits;
+	sbi->s_min_folio_order = get_order(sb->s_blocksize);
+	sbi->s_max_folio_order = sbi->s_min_folio_order;
 
 	es->s_first_data_block = cpu_to_le32(0);
 	es->s_blocks_count_lo = cpu_to_le32(layout->blocks_per_group *
@@ -791,10 +793,6 @@ static void test_mb_mark_used(struct kunit *test)
 	struct test_range ranges[TEST_RANGE_COUNT];
 	int i;
 
-	/* buddy cache assumes that each page contains at least one block */
-	if (sb->s_blocksize > PAGE_SIZE)
-		kunit_skip(test, "blocksize exceeds pagesize");
-
 	bitmap = kunit_kzalloc(test, sb->s_blocksize, GFP_KERNEL);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, bitmap);
 	buddy = kunit_kzalloc(test, sb->s_blocksize, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -858,10 +856,6 @@ static void test_mb_free_blocks(struct kunit *test)
 	int i;
 	struct test_range ranges[TEST_RANGE_COUNT];
 
-	/* buddy cache assumes that each page contains at least one block */
-	if (sb->s_blocksize > PAGE_SIZE)
-		kunit_skip(test, "blocksize exceeds pagesize");
-
 	bitmap = kunit_kzalloc(test, sb->s_blocksize, GFP_KERNEL);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, bitmap);
 	buddy = kunit_kzalloc(test, sb->s_blocksize, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -905,10 +899,6 @@ static void test_mb_mark_used_cost(struct kunit *test)
 	int i, j;
 	unsigned long start, end, all = 0;
 
-	/* buddy cache assumes that each page contains at least one block */
-	if (sb->s_blocksize > PAGE_SIZE)
-		kunit_skip(test, "blocksize exceeds pagesize");
-
 	ret = ext4_mb_load_buddy_test(sb, TEST_GOAL_GROUP, &e4b);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
 
-- 
2.43.7


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ext4: enable mballoc kunit tests for blocksize > PAGE_SIZE
  2026-05-06  7:59 [PATCH] ext4: enable mballoc kunit tests for blocksize > PAGE_SIZE Baokun Li
@ 2026-05-06  9:35 ` Jan Kara
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2026-05-06  9:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Baokun Li
  Cc: linux-ext4, tytso, adilger.kernel, jack, yi.zhang, ojaswin,
	ritesh.list

On Wed 06-05-26 15:59:00, Baokun Li wrote:
> With Large Block Size (LBS) support, ext4 can now use block sizes larger
> than PAGE_SIZE. The mballoc kunit tests previously skipped three test
> cases (test_mb_mark_used, test_mb_free_blocks, test_mb_mark_used_cost)
> under this configuration because the buddy cache inode's folio mapping
> order was never initialized in the test harness.
> 
> The real mount path configures s_min_folio_order and s_max_folio_order
> in ext4_fill_super(), which allows ext4_set_inode_mapping_order() to
> set up the correct folio order for the buddy cache inode. The kunit
> test bypasses ext4_fill_super(), so the mapping order stayed at zero
> and __filemap_get_folio() allocated order-0 folios too small for LBS.
> 
> Initialize s_min_folio_order and s_max_folio_order in mbt_init_sb_layout()
> to mirror ext4_fill_super() behavior, enabling properly sized folio
> allocations and removing the three blocksize > PAGE_SIZE skips.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>

Looks sensible. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c | 14 ++------------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
> index 90ed505fa4b1..04bc9f773d63 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
> @@ -206,6 +206,8 @@ static void mbt_init_sb_layout(struct super_block *sb,
>  	sbi->s_desc_per_block_bits =
>  		sb->s_blocksize_bits - (fls(layout->desc_size) - 1);
>  	sbi->s_desc_per_block = 1 << sbi->s_desc_per_block_bits;
> +	sbi->s_min_folio_order = get_order(sb->s_blocksize);
> +	sbi->s_max_folio_order = sbi->s_min_folio_order;
>  
>  	es->s_first_data_block = cpu_to_le32(0);
>  	es->s_blocks_count_lo = cpu_to_le32(layout->blocks_per_group *
> @@ -791,10 +793,6 @@ static void test_mb_mark_used(struct kunit *test)
>  	struct test_range ranges[TEST_RANGE_COUNT];
>  	int i;
>  
> -	/* buddy cache assumes that each page contains at least one block */
> -	if (sb->s_blocksize > PAGE_SIZE)
> -		kunit_skip(test, "blocksize exceeds pagesize");
> -
>  	bitmap = kunit_kzalloc(test, sb->s_blocksize, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, bitmap);
>  	buddy = kunit_kzalloc(test, sb->s_blocksize, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -858,10 +856,6 @@ static void test_mb_free_blocks(struct kunit *test)
>  	int i;
>  	struct test_range ranges[TEST_RANGE_COUNT];
>  
> -	/* buddy cache assumes that each page contains at least one block */
> -	if (sb->s_blocksize > PAGE_SIZE)
> -		kunit_skip(test, "blocksize exceeds pagesize");
> -
>  	bitmap = kunit_kzalloc(test, sb->s_blocksize, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, bitmap);
>  	buddy = kunit_kzalloc(test, sb->s_blocksize, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -905,10 +899,6 @@ static void test_mb_mark_used_cost(struct kunit *test)
>  	int i, j;
>  	unsigned long start, end, all = 0;
>  
> -	/* buddy cache assumes that each page contains at least one block */
> -	if (sb->s_blocksize > PAGE_SIZE)
> -		kunit_skip(test, "blocksize exceeds pagesize");
> -
>  	ret = ext4_mb_load_buddy_test(sb, TEST_GOAL_GROUP, &e4b);
>  	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>  
> -- 
> 2.43.7
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-06  9:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-06  7:59 [PATCH] ext4: enable mballoc kunit tests for blocksize > PAGE_SIZE Baokun Li
2026-05-06  9:35 ` Jan Kara

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox