* [PATCH] ext4: enable mballoc kunit tests for blocksize > PAGE_SIZE
@ 2026-05-06 7:59 Baokun Li
2026-05-06 9:35 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Baokun Li @ 2026-05-06 7:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
Cc: tytso, adilger.kernel, jack, yi.zhang, ojaswin, ritesh.list,
libaokun
With Large Block Size (LBS) support, ext4 can now use block sizes larger
than PAGE_SIZE. The mballoc kunit tests previously skipped three test
cases (test_mb_mark_used, test_mb_free_blocks, test_mb_mark_used_cost)
under this configuration because the buddy cache inode's folio mapping
order was never initialized in the test harness.
The real mount path configures s_min_folio_order and s_max_folio_order
in ext4_fill_super(), which allows ext4_set_inode_mapping_order() to
set up the correct folio order for the buddy cache inode. The kunit
test bypasses ext4_fill_super(), so the mapping order stayed at zero
and __filemap_get_folio() allocated order-0 folios too small for LBS.
Initialize s_min_folio_order and s_max_folio_order in mbt_init_sb_layout()
to mirror ext4_fill_super() behavior, enabling properly sized folio
allocations and removing the three blocksize > PAGE_SIZE skips.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c | 14 ++------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
index 90ed505fa4b1..04bc9f773d63 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
@@ -206,6 +206,8 @@ static void mbt_init_sb_layout(struct super_block *sb,
sbi->s_desc_per_block_bits =
sb->s_blocksize_bits - (fls(layout->desc_size) - 1);
sbi->s_desc_per_block = 1 << sbi->s_desc_per_block_bits;
+ sbi->s_min_folio_order = get_order(sb->s_blocksize);
+ sbi->s_max_folio_order = sbi->s_min_folio_order;
es->s_first_data_block = cpu_to_le32(0);
es->s_blocks_count_lo = cpu_to_le32(layout->blocks_per_group *
@@ -791,10 +793,6 @@ static void test_mb_mark_used(struct kunit *test)
struct test_range ranges[TEST_RANGE_COUNT];
int i;
- /* buddy cache assumes that each page contains at least one block */
- if (sb->s_blocksize > PAGE_SIZE)
- kunit_skip(test, "blocksize exceeds pagesize");
-
bitmap = kunit_kzalloc(test, sb->s_blocksize, GFP_KERNEL);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, bitmap);
buddy = kunit_kzalloc(test, sb->s_blocksize, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -858,10 +856,6 @@ static void test_mb_free_blocks(struct kunit *test)
int i;
struct test_range ranges[TEST_RANGE_COUNT];
- /* buddy cache assumes that each page contains at least one block */
- if (sb->s_blocksize > PAGE_SIZE)
- kunit_skip(test, "blocksize exceeds pagesize");
-
bitmap = kunit_kzalloc(test, sb->s_blocksize, GFP_KERNEL);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, bitmap);
buddy = kunit_kzalloc(test, sb->s_blocksize, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -905,10 +899,6 @@ static void test_mb_mark_used_cost(struct kunit *test)
int i, j;
unsigned long start, end, all = 0;
- /* buddy cache assumes that each page contains at least one block */
- if (sb->s_blocksize > PAGE_SIZE)
- kunit_skip(test, "blocksize exceeds pagesize");
-
ret = ext4_mb_load_buddy_test(sb, TEST_GOAL_GROUP, &e4b);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
--
2.43.7
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ext4: enable mballoc kunit tests for blocksize > PAGE_SIZE
2026-05-06 7:59 [PATCH] ext4: enable mballoc kunit tests for blocksize > PAGE_SIZE Baokun Li
@ 2026-05-06 9:35 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2026-05-06 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Baokun Li
Cc: linux-ext4, tytso, adilger.kernel, jack, yi.zhang, ojaswin,
ritesh.list
On Wed 06-05-26 15:59:00, Baokun Li wrote:
> With Large Block Size (LBS) support, ext4 can now use block sizes larger
> than PAGE_SIZE. The mballoc kunit tests previously skipped three test
> cases (test_mb_mark_used, test_mb_free_blocks, test_mb_mark_used_cost)
> under this configuration because the buddy cache inode's folio mapping
> order was never initialized in the test harness.
>
> The real mount path configures s_min_folio_order and s_max_folio_order
> in ext4_fill_super(), which allows ext4_set_inode_mapping_order() to
> set up the correct folio order for the buddy cache inode. The kunit
> test bypasses ext4_fill_super(), so the mapping order stayed at zero
> and __filemap_get_folio() allocated order-0 folios too small for LBS.
>
> Initialize s_min_folio_order and s_max_folio_order in mbt_init_sb_layout()
> to mirror ext4_fill_super() behavior, enabling properly sized folio
> allocations and removing the three blocksize > PAGE_SIZE skips.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
Looks sensible. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c | 14 ++------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
> index 90ed505fa4b1..04bc9f773d63 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
> @@ -206,6 +206,8 @@ static void mbt_init_sb_layout(struct super_block *sb,
> sbi->s_desc_per_block_bits =
> sb->s_blocksize_bits - (fls(layout->desc_size) - 1);
> sbi->s_desc_per_block = 1 << sbi->s_desc_per_block_bits;
> + sbi->s_min_folio_order = get_order(sb->s_blocksize);
> + sbi->s_max_folio_order = sbi->s_min_folio_order;
>
> es->s_first_data_block = cpu_to_le32(0);
> es->s_blocks_count_lo = cpu_to_le32(layout->blocks_per_group *
> @@ -791,10 +793,6 @@ static void test_mb_mark_used(struct kunit *test)
> struct test_range ranges[TEST_RANGE_COUNT];
> int i;
>
> - /* buddy cache assumes that each page contains at least one block */
> - if (sb->s_blocksize > PAGE_SIZE)
> - kunit_skip(test, "blocksize exceeds pagesize");
> -
> bitmap = kunit_kzalloc(test, sb->s_blocksize, GFP_KERNEL);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, bitmap);
> buddy = kunit_kzalloc(test, sb->s_blocksize, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -858,10 +856,6 @@ static void test_mb_free_blocks(struct kunit *test)
> int i;
> struct test_range ranges[TEST_RANGE_COUNT];
>
> - /* buddy cache assumes that each page contains at least one block */
> - if (sb->s_blocksize > PAGE_SIZE)
> - kunit_skip(test, "blocksize exceeds pagesize");
> -
> bitmap = kunit_kzalloc(test, sb->s_blocksize, GFP_KERNEL);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, bitmap);
> buddy = kunit_kzalloc(test, sb->s_blocksize, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -905,10 +899,6 @@ static void test_mb_mark_used_cost(struct kunit *test)
> int i, j;
> unsigned long start, end, all = 0;
>
> - /* buddy cache assumes that each page contains at least one block */
> - if (sb->s_blocksize > PAGE_SIZE)
> - kunit_skip(test, "blocksize exceeds pagesize");
> -
> ret = ext4_mb_load_buddy_test(sb, TEST_GOAL_GROUP, &e4b);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>
> --
> 2.43.7
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-06 9:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-06 7:59 [PATCH] ext4: enable mballoc kunit tests for blocksize > PAGE_SIZE Baokun Li
2026-05-06 9:35 ` Jan Kara
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox