From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 11/16] fscrypt: Replace calls to fscrypt_inode_uses_inline_crypto()
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 22:03:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260624050334.124606-12-ebiggers@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260624050334.124606-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>
Now that fscrypt's file contents en/decryption is always implemented
using blk-crypto when the filesystem is block-based, the calls to
fscrypt_inode_uses_inline_crypto() in fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c (which
contains functions that are called only from block-based filesystems)
are equivalent to checking whether the file is an encrypted regular
file, i.e. fscrypt_needs_contents_encryption(). Use that instead.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
---
fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c b/fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c
index caf706215621..111ea45732f0 100644
--- a/fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c
+++ b/fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c
@@ -225,12 +225,12 @@ static void fscrypt_generate_dun(const struct fscrypt_inode_info *ci,
* @inode: the file's inode
* @pos: the first file position (in bytes) in the I/O
* @gfp_mask: memory allocation flags - these must be a waiting mask so that
* bio_crypt_set_ctx can't fail.
*
- * If the contents of the file should be encrypted (or decrypted) with inline
- * encryption, then assign the appropriate encryption context to the bio.
+ * If the contents of the file should be encrypted (or decrypted), then assign
+ * the appropriate encryption context to the bio.
*
* Normally the bio should be newly allocated (i.e. no pages added yet), as
* otherwise fscrypt_mergeable_bio() won't work as intended.
*
* The encryption context will be freed automatically when the bio is freed.
@@ -239,11 +239,11 @@ void fscrypt_set_bio_crypt_ctx(struct bio *bio, const struct inode *inode,
loff_t pos, gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
const struct fscrypt_inode_info *ci;
u64 dun[BLK_CRYPTO_DUN_ARRAY_SIZE];
- if (!fscrypt_inode_uses_inline_crypto(inode))
+ if (!fscrypt_needs_contents_encryption(inode))
return;
ci = fscrypt_get_inode_info_raw(inode);
fscrypt_generate_dun(ci, pos, dun);
bio_crypt_set_ctx(bio, ci->ci_enc_key.blk_key, dun, gfp_mask);
@@ -254,16 +254,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fscrypt_set_bio_crypt_ctx);
* fscrypt_mergeable_bio() - test whether data can be added to a bio
* @bio: the bio being built up
* @inode: the inode for the next part of the I/O
* @pos: the next file position (in bytes) in the I/O
*
- * When building a bio which may contain data which should undergo inline
- * encryption (or decryption) via fscrypt, filesystems should call this function
- * to ensure that the resulting bio contains only contiguous data unit numbers.
- * This will return false if the next part of the I/O cannot be merged with the
- * bio because either the encryption key would be different or the encryption
- * data unit numbers would be discontiguous.
+ * When building a bio which may contain data which should undergo encryption
+ * (or decryption) via fscrypt, filesystems should call this function to ensure
+ * that the resulting bio contains only contiguous data unit numbers. This will
+ * return false if the next part of the I/O cannot be merged with the bio
+ * because either the encryption key would be different or the encryption data
+ * unit numbers would be discontiguous.
*
* fscrypt_set_bio_crypt_ctx() must have already been called on the bio.
*
* This function isn't required in cases where crypto-mergeability is ensured in
* another way, such as I/O targeting only a single file (and thus a single key)
@@ -276,11 +276,11 @@ bool fscrypt_mergeable_bio(struct bio *bio, const struct inode *inode,
{
const struct bio_crypt_ctx *bc = bio->bi_crypt_context;
const struct fscrypt_inode_info *ci;
u64 next_dun[BLK_CRYPTO_DUN_ARRAY_SIZE];
- if (!!bc != fscrypt_inode_uses_inline_crypto(inode))
+ if (!!bc != fscrypt_needs_contents_encryption(inode))
return false;
if (!bc)
return true;
ci = fscrypt_get_inode_info_raw(inode);
@@ -334,11 +334,11 @@ bool fscrypt_dio_supported(struct inode *inode)
* Key unavailable or couldn't be set up. This edge case isn't
* worth worrying about; just report that DIO is unsupported.
*/
return false;
}
- return fscrypt_inode_uses_inline_crypto(inode);
+ return true;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fscrypt_dio_supported);
/**
* fscrypt_limit_io_blocks() - limit I/O blocks to avoid discontiguous DUNs
@@ -363,11 +363,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fscrypt_dio_supported);
u64 fscrypt_limit_io_blocks(const struct inode *inode, u64 lblk, u64 nr_blocks)
{
const struct fscrypt_inode_info *ci;
u32 dun;
- if (!fscrypt_inode_uses_inline_crypto(inode))
+ if (!fscrypt_needs_contents_encryption(inode))
return nr_blocks;
if (nr_blocks <= 1)
return nr_blocks;
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-24 5:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-24 5:03 [PATCH 00/16] fscrypt: Standardize on blk-crypto Eric Biggers
2026-06-24 5:03 ` [PATCH 01/16] blk-crypto: Simplify check for fallback support Eric Biggers
2026-06-24 5:03 ` [PATCH 02/16] blk-crypto: Fold __blk_crypto_cfg_supported() into its caller Eric Biggers
2026-06-24 5:03 ` [PATCH 03/16] blk-crypto: Allow control over whether hardware is used Eric Biggers
2026-06-24 5:03 ` [PATCH 04/16] fscrypt: Fully disallow IV_INO_LBLK_32 with s_blocksize != PAGE_SIZE Eric Biggers
2026-06-24 5:03 ` [PATCH 05/16] fscrypt: Always use blk-crypto for contents on block-based filesystems Eric Biggers
2026-06-24 5:03 ` [PATCH 06/16] ext4: Remove fs-layer file contents en/decryption code Eric Biggers
2026-06-24 5:03 ` [PATCH 07/16] ext4: Make ext4_bio_write_folio() return void Eric Biggers
2026-06-24 5:03 ` [PATCH 08/16] ext4: Further de-generalize the bio postprocessing code Eric Biggers
2026-06-24 5:03 ` [PATCH 09/16] f2fs: Remove fs-layer file contents en/decryption code Eric Biggers
2026-06-24 5:03 ` [PATCH 10/16] fs/buffer: Remove fs-layer decryption code Eric Biggers
2026-06-24 11:40 ` Jan Kara
2026-06-24 5:03 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2026-06-24 5:03 ` [PATCH 12/16] fscrypt: Remove fscrypt_dio_supported() Eric Biggers
2026-06-24 5:03 ` [PATCH 13/16] fscrypt: Remove fs-layer zeroout code Eric Biggers
2026-06-24 5:03 ` [PATCH 14/16] fscrypt: Remove unused functions and workqueue Eric Biggers
2026-06-24 5:03 ` [PATCH 15/16] fscrypt: Merge bio.c and inline_crypt.c into block.c Eric Biggers
2026-06-24 5:03 ` [PATCH 16/16] fscrypt: Add safety checks to non-block-based en/decryption Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260624050334.124606-12-ebiggers@kernel.org \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox