* [PATCH] ext4: don't report delalloc data as a hole on indirect-mapped inodes
[not found] <CGME20260826052446epcms2p5a415be5fbfe23b8a32786f0ae6d05aea@epcms2p5>
@ 2026-08-26 5:24 ` Daejun Park
2026-08-26 5:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-26 16:55 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daejun Park @ 2026-08-26 5:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca
Cc: jack@suse.cz, yi.zhang@huawei.com, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
libaokun@linux.alibaba.com, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
amonakov@ispras.ru, Daejun Park
When a plain lookup finds no block, ext4_ind_map_blocks() sizes the hole
it reports by counting the empty subtrees under 'partial' in the on-disk
indirect tree. That count knows nothing about delayed allocation, so a
range holding delalloc data that has not been written back yet is
reported as a plain hole. The extent-mapped path does not have this
problem: ext4_ext_determine_insert_hole() trims the hole it found at the
first delayed extent before returning it.
ext4_map_blocks() consults the extent status tree before it calls into
the mapping layer, so a query that starts exactly on the delayed block
still finds it. A query that starts earlier does not, because the hole
reported for the earlier block already spans the delayed one. On a
4k-block filesystem, lseek(SEEK_DATA) from offset 0 on a file whose only
data block is at logical block N and is still dirty returns:
N = 0..11 direct blocks N << 12
N = 12 first single-indirect block N << 12
N = 13..1035 inside that indirect block -1 ENXIO
N = 1036 first double-indirect block N << 12
Blocks 12 and 1036 survive because the query lands on the delayed block
itself. Blocks 13..1035 are swallowed by the 1024-block hole reported
for block 12. fiemap loses the same data for the same reason.
An ext3 filesystem mounted as ext4 hits this during ordinary use: ext3
inodes stay indirect mapped, while mount -t ext4 turns on delayed
allocation even though mounting ext3 with -o delalloc is explicitly
rejected. install(1) from coreutils uses SEEK_DATA to locate data in
its source file, so installing a sparse file that has not been written
back silently produces a destination of the right size holding none of
the data:
truncate -s 1G img && mkfs.ext3 -F img && mount -t ext4 img mnt
echo | dd of=mnt/src bs=1 count=1 seek=64K
install mnt/src mnt/dst
cmp mnt/src mnt/dst # differ: char 65537
Trim the hole at the first delayed extent, the way the extent-mapped
path does. ext4_es_find_extent_range() does not clip the extent it
returns to the queried range, so skip one that begins at or before
m_lblk and clamp the result against the hole already found.
With this the sweep above returns N << 12 for every N, while the
nodelalloc and extent-mapped controls are unchanged. generic/225,
generic/285, generic/286, generic/436, generic/448 and generic/490 pass
on ext4 made both with and without the extent feature.
Fixes: facab4d9711e ("ext4: return hole from ext4_map_blocks()")
Reported-by: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/594c17d9-c00f-e485-96fb-cedf27ce3aa3@ispras.ru/
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
---
fs/ext4/indirect.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/indirect.c b/fs/ext4/indirect.c
index 5aec759eed70..4a1ad86a42bd 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/indirect.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/indirect.c
@@ -574,6 +574,7 @@ int ext4_ind_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
/* Next simple case - plain lookup failed */
if ((flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE) == 0) {
unsigned epb = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize / sizeof(u32);
+ struct extent_status es;
int i;
/*
@@ -589,6 +590,21 @@ int ext4_ind_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
/* Fill in size of a hole we found */
map->m_pblk = 0;
map->m_len = umin(map->m_len, count);
+
+ /*
+ * The hole was measured on the on-disk indirect tree, which
+ * knows nothing about delayed allocation. Trim it at the
+ * first delayed extent, the way the extent-mapped path does
+ * in ext4_ext_determine_insert_hole(), so that callers do not
+ * mistake data that is not written back yet for a hole. The
+ * extent found is not clipped to the queried range, so it may
+ * begin before m_lblk or past the end of the hole.
+ */
+ ext4_es_find_extent_range(inode, &ext4_es_is_delayed,
+ map->m_lblk,
+ map->m_lblk + map->m_len - 1, &es);
+ if (es.es_len && es.es_lblk > map->m_lblk)
+ map->m_len = umin(map->m_len, es.es_lblk - map->m_lblk);
goto cleanup;
}
base-commit: 9091c97be34083587a75db174aab51551d8e8543
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ext4: don't report delalloc data as a hole on indirect-mapped inodes
2026-08-26 5:24 ` [PATCH] ext4: don't report delalloc data as a hole on indirect-mapped inodes Daejun Park
@ 2026-08-26 5:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-26 16:55 ` Jan Kara
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-08-26 5:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daejun Park; +Cc: tytso, linux-ext4
> When a plain lookup finds no block, ext4_ind_map_blocks() sizes the hole
> it reports by counting the empty subtrees under 'partial' in the on-disk
> indirect tree. That count knows nothing about delayed allocation, so a
> range holding delalloc data that has not been written back yet is
> reported as a plain hole. The extent-mapped path does not have this
> problem: ext4_ext_determine_insert_hole() trims the hole it found at the
> first delayed extent before returning it.
>
> ext4_map_blocks() consults the extent status tree before it calls into
> the mapping layer, so a query that starts exactly on the delayed block
> still finds it. A query that starts earlier does not, because the hole
> reported for the earlier block already spans the delayed one. On a
> 4k-block filesystem, lseek(SEEK_DATA) from offset 0 on a file whose only
> data block is at logical block N and is still dirty returns:
>
> [ ... ]
> Fixes: facab4d9711e ("ext4: return hole from ext4_map_blocks()")
> Reported-by: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/594c17d9-c00f-e485-96fb-cedf27ce3aa3@ispras.ru/
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260826052446epcms2p5a415be5fbfe23b8a32786f0ae6d05aea@epcms2p5?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ext4: don't report delalloc data as a hole on indirect-mapped inodes
2026-08-26 5:24 ` [PATCH] ext4: don't report delalloc data as a hole on indirect-mapped inodes Daejun Park
2026-08-26 5:34 ` sashiko-bot
@ 2026-08-26 16:55 ` Jan Kara
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2026-08-26 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daejun Park
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz,
yi.zhang@huawei.com, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
libaokun@linux.alibaba.com, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
amonakov@ispras.ru
On Wed 26-08-26 14:24:46, Daejun Park wrote:
> When a plain lookup finds no block, ext4_ind_map_blocks() sizes the hole
> it reports by counting the empty subtrees under 'partial' in the on-disk
> indirect tree. That count knows nothing about delayed allocation, so a
> range holding delalloc data that has not been written back yet is
> reported as a plain hole. The extent-mapped path does not have this
> problem: ext4_ext_determine_insert_hole() trims the hole it found at the
> first delayed extent before returning it.
>
> ext4_map_blocks() consults the extent status tree before it calls into
> the mapping layer, so a query that starts exactly on the delayed block
> still finds it. A query that starts earlier does not, because the hole
> reported for the earlier block already spans the delayed one. On a
> 4k-block filesystem, lseek(SEEK_DATA) from offset 0 on a file whose only
> data block is at logical block N and is still dirty returns:
>
> N = 0..11 direct blocks N << 12
> N = 12 first single-indirect block N << 12
> N = 13..1035 inside that indirect block -1 ENXIO
> N = 1036 first double-indirect block N << 12
>
> Blocks 12 and 1036 survive because the query lands on the delayed block
> itself. Blocks 13..1035 are swallowed by the 1024-block hole reported
> for block 12. fiemap loses the same data for the same reason.
>
> An ext3 filesystem mounted as ext4 hits this during ordinary use: ext3
> inodes stay indirect mapped, while mount -t ext4 turns on delayed
> allocation even though mounting ext3 with -o delalloc is explicitly
> rejected. install(1) from coreutils uses SEEK_DATA to locate data in
> its source file, so installing a sparse file that has not been written
> back silently produces a destination of the right size holding none of
> the data:
>
> truncate -s 1G img && mkfs.ext3 -F img && mount -t ext4 img mnt
> echo | dd of=mnt/src bs=1 count=1 seek=64K
> install mnt/src mnt/dst
> cmp mnt/src mnt/dst # differ: char 65537
>
> Trim the hole at the first delayed extent, the way the extent-mapped
> path does. ext4_es_find_extent_range() does not clip the extent it
> returns to the queried range, so skip one that begins at or before
> m_lblk and clamp the result against the hole already found.
>
> With this the sweep above returns N << 12 for every N, while the
> nodelalloc and extent-mapped controls are unchanged. generic/225,
> generic/285, generic/286, generic/436, generic/448 and generic/490 pass
> on ext4 made both with and without the extent feature.
>
> Fixes: facab4d9711e ("ext4: return hole from ext4_map_blocks()")
> Reported-by: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/594c17d9-c00f-e485-96fb-cedf27ce3aa3@ispras.ru/
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
Thanks for report and the fix! So I think a better fix here is to lift most
of the logic of ext4_ext_determine_insert_hole() into a helper function
like:
ext4_lblk_t ext4_determine_insert_hole(struct inode *inode,
ext4_lblk_t hole_start, ext4_lblk_t hole_len)
and then use it from both ext4_ext_map_block() and ext4_ind_map_blocks().
That avoids the duplication and also have all the comments regarding
various special cases (like delalloc extent covering map->m_lblk) in one
place.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-26 16:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CGME20260826052446epcms2p5a415be5fbfe23b8a32786f0ae6d05aea@epcms2p5>
2026-08-26 5:24 ` [PATCH] ext4: don't report delalloc data as a hole on indirect-mapped inodes Daejun Park
2026-08-26 5:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-26 16:55 ` Jan Kara
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox