From: Alex Tomas <alex@clusterfs.com>
To: cmm@us.ibm.com
Cc: Dmitriy Monakhov <dmonakhov@sw.ru>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: delayed allocatiou result in Oops
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:11:02 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46778186.9030306@clusterfs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1182214878.3711.21.camel@dyn9047017103.beaverton.ibm.com>
Mingming Cao wrote:
>>From the comments it says the page->private is set to 1 to letting
> commit_write know that it needs block reservation, but I don't see the
> page->private value being checked in ext4_wb_commit_write(). Instead,
> the PageMappedToDisk(page) flag is being checked.
>
> Alex, can you clarify the use of page->private and PagePrivate flag
> here? Do we still need the page->private for delayed allocation, with
> PageBooked flag and PageMappedToDisk page flag?
sorry for confusion, we need PagePrivate so that truncate calls our
->invalidatepage(). in turn this call is needed to drop unused reservation.
block_read_full_page() must not happen to pages being delayed allocated
in the first place - it's uptodate by definition. I think the problem
began when ext4_wb_commit_write() exited due to -ENOSPC but left not
uptodate *and* with PG_private. then subsequent access to page turned to
block_read_full_page() which relies on PG_private and meaningful private
field. Dmitry, could you repeat the test with SetPagePrivate(page) moved
to after that if() with ext4_wb_reserve_space_page(), please?
as i'm here ... status update: I've been reworking delayed allocation
patches to support blocksize < PAGE_CACHE_SIZE (and address akpm's request
for more generic implementation). the patch isn't ready for review, but
hopefully will be in few days.
thanks, Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-19 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-14 7:23 delayed allocatiou result in Oops Dmitriy Monakhov
2007-06-15 5:14 ` Alex Tomas
2007-06-15 23:16 ` Mingming Cao
2007-06-16 8:02 ` [PATCH] ext4:fix invariant checking in ext4_rebalance_reservation Dmitriy Monakhov
2007-06-18 21:09 ` Mingming Cao
2007-06-19 5:56 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2007-06-16 8:14 ` delayed allocatiou result in Oops Dmitriy Monakhov
2007-06-19 1:01 ` Mingming Cao
2007-06-19 7:11 ` Alex Tomas [this message]
2007-06-19 9:16 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2007-06-19 9:36 ` Alex Tomas
2007-06-19 21:50 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-06-19 16:23 ` Mingming Cao
2007-06-19 16:47 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2007-06-20 8:15 ` Alex Tomas
2007-06-20 23:46 ` Mingming Cao
2007-06-21 4:50 ` Dmitry Monakhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46778186.9030306@clusterfs.com \
--to=alex@clusterfs.com \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dmonakhov@sw.ru \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox