* Checksuming metadata+data
@ 2007-05-17 4:12 sftf
2007-05-17 18:03 ` Andreas Dilger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: sftf @ 2007-05-17 4:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
Why to not implement two modes (via create/mount options):
1. Checksuming metadata only
2. Checksuming metadata+data (i.e. checksuming ALL)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Checksuming metadata+data
2007-05-17 4:12 Checksuming metadata+data sftf
@ 2007-05-17 18:03 ` Andreas Dilger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Dilger @ 2007-05-17 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sftf; +Cc: linux-ext4
On May 17, 2007 10:12 +0600, sftf wrote:
> Why to not implement two modes (via create/mount options):
> 1. Checksuming metadata only
> 2. Checksuming metadata+data (i.e. checksuming ALL)
I don't think anyone is planning data checksumming any time soon. Even
metadata checksumming is some ways away.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-05-17 18:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-05-17 4:12 Checksuming metadata+data sftf
2007-05-17 18:03 ` Andreas Dilger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox