From: "Lukáš Czerner" <lczerner@redhat.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Vlad Dobrotescu <vlad@dobrotescu.ca>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question: errors=continue behaviour for failed external journal device
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 11:11:45 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1407281107530.2077@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140727000733.GV6725@thunk.org>
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 20:07:33 -0400
> From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> To: Vlad Dobrotescu <vlad@dobrotescu.ca>
> Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Question: errors=continue behaviour for failed external journal
> device
>
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:07:59PM +0000, Vlad Dobrotescu wrote:
> > If this isn't the proper place for this question, please point me in
> > the right direction.
> >
> > I couldn't find any description on Ext4's behaviour when mounted
> > with errors=continue and external journal if the journal block device
> > is unavailable at mount time (or becomes unavailable at some point).
> >
> > I would be using CentOS 7 (kernel 3.10.0-123.4.4.el7 x86_64) and
> > (probably) full data journaling on a SSD. Can someone help?
>
> So there are two different questions.
>
> If you use errors=continue, there is the chance that the file system
> inconsistencies that discovered could cause further file system
> damage, which might lead to the loss or corruption of data files
> written earlier. So it's not really recommended for most purposes,
I very much agree with that, that's why I was quite surprised that I
found out recently that this is the default. I was living in the
delusion that the default was ERRORS_RO for as long as I can remember.
So my question is, should we change it ? This really does not seem
like a sane default.
Thanks!
-Lukas
> unless you have some scheme where you are monitoring dmesgs and having
> some strategy to deal with detected file system errors, or when the
> system absolutely, positively must continue running, and this is more
> important than potential data loss.
>
> If the journal block device is not present then the file system can't
> be mounted, and if the system was uncleanly shut down you won't be
> able to recover from the unclean shutdown by replaying the journal.
>
> If the journal block device is *gone*, it is possible to remove the
> external journal block device, and then force a file system repair,
> but if this happens after an unclean shutdown, you may very well lose
> data.
>
> Cheers,
>
> - Ted
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-28 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-26 23:07 Question: errors=continue behaviour for failed external journal device Vlad Dobrotescu
2014-07-27 0:07 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-07-27 0:34 ` Vlad Dobrotescu
2014-07-27 1:07 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-07-28 9:11 ` Lukáš Czerner [this message]
2014-07-28 13:17 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-07-28 13:25 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-07-28 13:31 ` Vlad Dobrotescu
2014-07-28 15:00 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-07-28 16:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1407281107530.2077@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=vlad@dobrotescu.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox