Linux EXT4 FS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Baokun Li" <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] block: split encrypted bios at data unit boundaries
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 17:20:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-167342@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261011170958.1759230-9-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>

> Splitting a bio advances the remaining bio's data unit number by the
> number of whole data units that were split off:
> 
>   bio_split()
>    └─ bio_advance()
>       └─ bio_crypt_advance()
>          └─ bio_crypt_dun_increment(dun, bytes >> data_unit_size_bits)
> 
> The shift truncates, so splitting inside a data unit leaves the
> remainder with the wrong data unit number and silently corrupts data.
> 
> The split size is already rounded down to the logical block size, so
> this is only possible when the data unit size is larger than it, e.g.
> a fscrypt filesystem with a 4K block size on a device with a 512-byte
> logical block size.
> 
> Fix this by rounding the split size down to a data unit boundary.  The
> split alignment becomes the maximum of the logical block size, the
> data unit size, and the zone write granularity, so a zoned write still
> meets all three requirements.
> 
> Split bios can be up to one data unit smaller than the queue limits
> allow, so a bio can be split a little more often.  The number of
> segments for the split bio is still counted up to the size before the
> rounding, so it can be larger than needed; it is only used for
> accounting.
> 
> Fixes: a892c8d52c02 ("block: Inline encryption support for blk-mq")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261011170958.1759230-1-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com?part=8


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-11 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-11 17:09 [PATCH 00/13] block, ext4: allow encryption with a block size larger than the page size Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 01/13] ext4: refuse encryption when block size > " Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 02/13] ext4: reject encrypted inodes " Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 03/13] blk-crypto: reject fallback data unit sizes it can't handle Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12  7:50     ` Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 04/13] blk-crypto: decrypt one data unit per crypto request Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 05/13] blk-crypto: encrypt " Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 06/13] blk-crypto: support data units larger than a page Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 07/13] iomap: align the direct I/O bios of encrypted files to the block size Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 08/13] block: split encrypted bios at data unit boundaries Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:20   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 09/13] block: warn about bios that can't be split Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 10/13] block: don't require data unit aligned bio_vecs for encrypted bios Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12  8:09     ` Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 11/13] ext4: allow encryption with a block size larger than the page size Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 12/13] ext4: send folios that cover a wraparound to the buffer_head path Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 13/13] ext4: allow large folios for encrypted files Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:23   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-167342@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox