From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Baokun Li" <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/13] blk-crypto: encrypt one data unit per crypto request
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 17:26:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-167348@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261011170958.1759230-6-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
> __blk_crypto_fallback_encrypt_bio() encrypts the source bio one bio_vec
> at a time: it walks the bio with bio_iter_iovec(), which clamps each
> bio_vec to a single page, encrypts all the data units of that bio_vec
> into its bounce page with one crypto request per data unit, and starts a
> new encrypted bio when all of its pages are in use.
>
> That structure cannot express a data unit that spans more than a page.
> In preparation for supporting such data units, restructure the loop
> around the data unit, the same way as the decryption path: collect the
> bio_vecs that make up one data unit in blk_crypto_du_bvecs(), encrypt it
> with a single crypto request whose scatterlist covers exactly those
> bio_vecs, and advance the source bio by one data unit.
>
> Unlike the decryption path, which decrypts in place using one
> scatterlist for both sides, the encryption path writes the ciphertext
> to the bounce pages, so it fills the scatterlist for each side of the
> crypto request, and calls the same blk_crypto_crypt_du() helper, with
> the encryption direction and the bounce page scatterlist as the
> destination.
>
> A data unit is now encrypted as soon as it is complete instead of when
> all the data units of its bio_vec are, and the first bio_vec of a data
> unit is added to the encrypted bio with the whole length of the source
> bio_vec it starts in, as the data units that follow it in that bio_vec
> share its bounce page.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261011170958.1759230-1-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-11 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-11 17:09 [PATCH 00/13] block, ext4: allow encryption with a block size larger than the page size Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 01/13] ext4: refuse encryption when block size > " Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 02/13] ext4: reject encrypted inodes " Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 03/13] blk-crypto: reject fallback data unit sizes it can't handle Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 7:50 ` Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 04/13] blk-crypto: decrypt one data unit per crypto request Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 05/13] blk-crypto: encrypt " Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:26 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 06/13] blk-crypto: support data units larger than a page Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 07/13] iomap: align the direct I/O bios of encrypted files to the block size Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 08/13] block: split encrypted bios at data unit boundaries Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 09/13] block: warn about bios that can't be split Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 10/13] block: don't require data unit aligned bio_vecs for encrypted bios Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 8:09 ` Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 11/13] ext4: allow encryption with a block size larger than the page size Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 12/13] ext4: send folios that cover a wraparound to the buffer_head path Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 13/13] ext4: allow large folios for encrypted files Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:23 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-167348@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox