Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] kunit: Add KUNIT_CASE_PARAM_UNIQUE() and KUNIT_CASE_PARAM_WITH_INIT_UNIQUE()

[sashiko-bot@kernel.org]

> KUNIT_CASE_PARAM() and KUNIT_CASE_PARAM_WITH_INIT() name the test case
> after the test function. Several suites reuse one test function with
> more than one parameter generator or param_init() function, listing it
> once per set of parameters, which leads to multiple tests being created
> with the same name. Same-named cases cannot be told apart in the results
> and cannot be selected individually with kunit.filter_glob=, so kunit.py
> --run_isolated=test boots a kernel for every entry and each kernel runs
> all of the same-named cases.
> 
> We could fix this by having the KUNIT_CASE_PARAM() macros always include
> the parameter name but this would not only rename all existing users but
> also result in some awkwardly named tests. Instead introduce some new
> macros for use in cases where we need to disambiguate.
> 
> Add KUNIT_CASE_PARAM_UNIQUE() and KUNIT_CASE_PARAM_WITH_INIT_UNIQUE()
> which behave identically to the existing macros but include the name of
> the parameter generator or the param_init() function in the name of
> the case, giving names such as sha1_test-sha1_gen_params. The
> param_init() function is used for the WITH_INIT variant since currently
> all the tests which register parameter arrays from param_init() all
> share the generic kunit_array_gen_params() generator.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261105-kunit-param-names-v2-0-765b3d5275d2@kernel.org?part=2