From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] ext4: Give the extents KUnit cases distinct names
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2026 05:32:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-200827@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105-kunit-param-names-v2-3-765b3d5275d2@kernel.org>
> The ext4_extents_test suite runs test_split_convert() against three
> different parameter arrays by listing it three times with
> KUNIT_CASE_PARAM_WITH_INIT(), which names each case after the function.
> All three cases are therefore called test_split_convert, so they cannot
> be told apart in the results.
>
> Use KUNIT_CASE_PARAM_WITH_INIT_UNIQUE() for these entries so that each
> case is also named for the param_init() function which registers its
> parameter array, for example
> test_split_convert-test_convert_initialized_param_init.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261105-kunit-param-names-v2-0-765b3d5275d2@kernel.org?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 5:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 16:00 [PATCH v2 0/9] kunit: Add KUNIT_CASE_PARAM_UNIQUE() and KUNIT_CASE_PARAM_WITH_INIT_UNIQUE() Mark Brown
2026-11-05 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] firmware: cs_dsp: Run the wmfw payload error tests with invalid block types Mark Brown
2026-11-06 5:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] kunit: Add KUNIT_CASE_PARAM_UNIQUE() and KUNIT_CASE_PARAM_WITH_INIT_UNIQUE() Mark Brown
2026-11-06 5:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] ext4: Give the extents KUnit cases distinct names Mark Brown
2026-11-06 5:32 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-05 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] firmware: cs_dsp: Give the control read/write " Mark Brown
2026-11-06 5:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] firmware: cs_dsp: Give the control cache " Mark Brown
2026-11-06 5:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] firmware: cs_dsp: Give the wmfw block error " Mark Brown
2026-11-06 5:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] firmware: cs_dsp: Give the bin file " Mark Brown
2026-11-06 5:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] ASoC: cs35l56: Give the speaker ID pad config " Mark Brown
2026-11-06 5:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] ASoC: wm_adsp: Give the firmware search order " Mark Brown
2026-11-06 5:42 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-200827@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox