Linux EXT4 FS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mani Tofigh" <mt4022@columbia.edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ext4: fix directory count after fast commit replay
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 00:13:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-209888@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111-ext4-fc-replay-mkdir-v1-1-4b20be29aed8@columbia.edu>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] ext4: unaligned memory access on raw_fc_inode in
  ext4_fc_replay_inode()
It also noticed 1 related pre-existing issue this patch does not
introduce:
- [Critical] ext4: unpropagated parent lookup error in
  ext4_fc_replay_link_internal() [1]
--

commit da3b7bd74825f337c491fafdca323cce067546e9
Author: Mani Tofigh <mt4022@columbia.edu>

ext4: fix directory count after fast commit replay

This commit passes the inode mode to ext4_mark_inode_used() so that fast
commit replay increments bg_used_dirs_count when marking a directory inode
in use, and moves the ext4_iget() lookup in ext4_fc_replay_create() ahead
of ext4_mark_inode_used().

> diff --git a/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c b/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
> index 0cac890cf3702..0eac7be3f58c2 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
> @@ -1984,7 +1984,7 @@ static int ext4_fc_replay_inode(struct super_block *sb,
>  	ret = sync_dirty_buffer(iloc.bh);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto out_brelse;
> -	ret = ext4_mark_inode_used(sb, ino);
> +	ret = ext4_mark_inode_used(sb, ino, le16_to_cpu(raw_fc_inode->i_mode));
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto out_brelse;
>  

[Severity: Medium]
Can dereferencing raw_fc_inode->i_mode trigger an unaligned memory access
fault on strict-alignment architectures?

Fast commit TLVs are packed contiguously without alignment padding, so an
earlier dentry tag with an odd-length filename places subsequent
EXT4_FC_TAG_INODE payloads and raw_fc_inode at an odd byte offset.
ext4_fc_replay_inode() already copies raw_fc_inode into the aligned
raw_inode buffer earlier in the function, so reading raw_inode->i_mode
instead avoids the unaligned load.

> @@ -2041,11 +2041,6 @@ static int ext4_fc_replay_create(struct super_block *sb,
>  	trace_ext4_fc_replay(sb, EXT4_FC_TAG_CREAT, darg.ino,
>  			darg.parent_ino, darg.dname_len);
>  
> -	/* This takes care of update group descriptor and other metadata */
> -	ret = ext4_mark_inode_used(sb, darg.ino);
> -	if (ret)
> -		goto out;
> -
>  	inode = ext4_iget(sb, darg.ino, EXT4_IGET_NORMAL);
>  	if (IS_ERR(inode)) {
>  		ext4_debug("inode %d not found.", darg.ino);
> @@ -2054,6 +2049,11 @@ static int ext4_fc_replay_create(struct super_block *sb,
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* This takes care of update group descriptor and other metadata */
> +	ret = ext4_mark_inode_used(sb, darg.ino, inode->i_mode);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;
> +
>  	if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
>  		/*
>  		 * If we are creating a directory, we need to make sure that the

[Severity: Critical]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but does
ext4_fc_replay_link_internal() [1] silently return 0 when looking up
the parent directory fails?

fs/ext4/fast_commit.c:ext4_fc_replay_link_internal() {
	...
	int ret = 0;

	dir = ext4_iget(sb, darg->parent_ino, EXT4_IGET_NORMAL);
	if (IS_ERR(dir)) {
		ext4_debug("Dir with inode %d not found.", darg->parent_ino);
		dir = NULL;
		goto out;
	}
	...
out:
	if (dir)
		iput(dir);

	return ret;
}

When ext4_fc_replay_create() calls ext4_fc_replay_link_internal() and the
parent lookup fails, it receives 0 and proceeds to set i_nlink to 1 and
mark the inode dirty, leaving an unlinked inode and inconsistent metadata
instead of aborting recovery.

[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-f99925c6-c893-41e7-947b-8df2ac40e92c

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261111-ext4-fc-replay-mkdir-v1-0-4b20be29aed8@columbia.edu?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-12  0:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-11 23:02 [PATCH 0/3] ext4: fix counts left by fast commit replay of a mkdir Mani Tofigh via B4 Relay
2026-11-11 23:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] ext4: fix directory count after fast commit replay Mani Tofigh via B4 Relay
2026-11-12  0:13   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-11 23:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] ext4: fix directory i_blocks " Mani Tofigh via B4 Relay
2026-11-12  0:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 23:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] ext4: fix directory link counts " Mani Tofigh via B4 Relay
2026-11-12  0:16   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-209888@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mt4022@columbia.edu \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox